Democratic Party, ‘Special Prosecutor Kim Kun-hee’s third rejection’: “I am appalled by the shamelessness”

by times news cr
Park ‌Chan-dae, floor‌ leader ⁣of the Democratic Party of Korea, ‌and ⁤members of the National‌ Assembly are holding ‍an emergency⁤ press conference in front‍ of ⁢the President’s Office in Yongsan-gu, Seoul on the 26th to condemn the veto of the⁤ Kim Kun-hee⁤ Special Prosecutor Act. 2024.11.26/News 1

Regarding ‌President Yoon Seok-yeol’s exercise of the right to request reconsideration (veto) of the Special Prosecutor Act on First Lady ​Kim Kun-hee, the Democratic Party of ⁤Korea stated on the 26th, “We are appalled by the president’s shamelessness.”

Cho Seung-rae, chief spokesperson for the Democratic Party, said this during a briefing this afternoon, saying,​ “The people will not ‌forgive the president who refused‌ to follow the people’s orders.”

He continued, “President Yoon Seok-yeol, who once again went against public opinion and ‍declared​ that ⁤he would protect his spouse, ⁤for​ whom is⁢ he holding that position? “Is ⁣this⁤ Mrs. Kim ⁢Kun-hee?”⁣ he⁣ criticized.

He ⁢said, “At the last press conference, President Yoon insisted that ‘the‌ Korean dictionary must ⁤be changed’ even ​in the face of ‍clear evidence of state interference, and when it became impossible to ⁣avoid a special prosecution, he criticized the special prosecution system as ‍unconstitutional.” “But President Yoon ‍Seok-yeol today He said, “Once again, we have driven a wedge into the people’s despair and ‍scattered⁤ ashes.”

Chief Spokesperson⁣ Cho then urged ‌the People Power Party ⁤to make a decision. He said, ‌“The ball is now⁤ in the hands of ‌the people,” and “It is not the time for leisurely ‌family fights.”⁢ “Choose whether you will move forward on⁣ the path⁤ of truth with the people, or whether you will coexist with the Yoon Seok-yeol regime,” he said.

(Seoul = News 1) ‌
⁤ ​ ​ ⁤ ⁢ ⁢ ​

Hot news ⁣now

  • What are the potential impacts of the Kim Kun-hee Special ⁤Prosecutor Act veto on South Korea’s upcoming elections?

    Title: A Conversation on the Political Pulse of South Korea: The Aftermath of the Kim Kun-hee Special Prosecutor Act Veto

    Interviewer (Time.news Editor):⁤ Welcome to another episode of In Focus. ⁣Today, ​we delve into a pivotal event in South Korean politics—the recent veto of the Kim​ Kun-hee Special Prosecutor ‌Act by President ​Yoon Seok-yeol and the subsequent ⁢fallout. We have with us Dr.‍ Han Soo-jin,⁣ a ⁤political analyst specializing in South Korean governance and ‌public policy. Dr. Han, thank you ⁣for joining ⁤us.

    Dr. Han Soo-jin:⁣ Thank you for having me. It’s a critical time for South Korea,‍ and ⁢I’m glad to discuss this.

    Editor: Let’s start ​with⁤ the basics. The veto of the‌ Special Prosecutor Act has sparked significant outrage from the⁤ Democratic Party of Korea. What was your immediate reaction to President Yoon’s ‍decision?

    Dr. Han: The veto was expected in some circles, given the political ‌climate. However, it has certainly amplified ⁢existing tensions. The Democratic Party’s strong⁢ condemnation ⁣highlights the disconnect between the government and​ public sentiment. They labeled the president as “shameless,” indicating a growing ⁣frustration among opposition parties.

    Editor: Cho Seung-rae, ⁢the chief ⁣spokesperson⁢ for the Democratic Party, ‌mentioned ⁣that this was a move against public ‍opinion. How do you assess the public’s mood around this issue?

    Dr. Han: There’s ⁣a ⁣palpable sense of disappointment among the‌ electorate. Many see this‍ as a refusal by President Yoon to take accountability not just for ⁣his administration but also⁢ to‌ protect his spouse, Kim Kun-hee. The fact ⁤he has chosen to prioritize​ personal relationships over legislative ethics plays into a larger narrative‍ of disillusionment with political⁤ leadership.

    Editor: Fascinating. During​ the ⁢press conference, ​Cho asked, “For whom is he holding that position?” This question resonates deeply with voters. What do you see as the ramifications of this kind of rhetoric?

    Dr. Han:⁢ It taps into a critical issue of trust. When leaders are perceived as prioritizing personal interests over public ‌demands, it can lead to widespread cynicism about the political process. Voter apathy could grow, or conversely, it could mobilize a backlash that may impact future elections, compelling the ruling⁤ party to reconsider its approach.

    Editor: You mentioned cynicism, but ‌do you think the parliamentary opposition is effectively seizing​ this moment to rally⁤ support?

    Dr. Han: The opposition has a unique opportunity here. By framing their argument around ⁢the principles ⁤of transparency and accountability, they⁤ can galvanize⁤ public support. Cho’s statements urging the ‌People Power Party to decide‍ whether to align with the people or the regime could resonate strongly with constituents yearning for genuine leadership.

    Editor: The phrase “the ball is now in the hands of the people” is profound. How pivotal do you think public response will be‍ in this scenario?

    Dr. Han: Absolutely pivotal. Public ‍mobilization can pressure the ⁢government ⁣to reconsider its stance. If citizens ⁢perceive this veto as corruption or​ favoritism, it could lead to protests or a substantial shift ⁣in electoral support. Civil society’s reaction will be essential as‍ they form ⁢the backbone of any democratic movement.

    Editor: With the possibility of‍ increased public ⁣discontent, where do you see this situation heading in the coming weeks?

    Dr.⁢ Han:⁤ It’s crucial for both the ruling party and the opposition to navigate ​this diplomatically. If​ they engage in open dialogue, they may find common ground. However, if they dig⁢ in their heels, ⁤we could see escalating⁣ tensions. It’s a delicate ‌balancing act, but one that could reshape ‍South Korea’s political landscape for years to come.

    Editor: Thank you, Dr. ​Han, for your insights on this developing⁤ story. The intersection of personal ​politics and public sentiment is indeed a volatile ‌mix. We appreciate your time and⁣ expertise.

    Dr. Han: Thank you for the discussion. It’s always an evolving narrative, and I look forward to seeing​ how it unfolds.

    Editor: Stay tuned, everyone, as we continue to track this important ⁤issue here at In Focus.

You may also like

Leave a Comment