Sour France 5, in the show Politics C of November 24, the historian Benjamin Stora had difficulty in frankly supporting the writer Boualem Sansal. From being an “established” historian to being a court historian there is only one step and, in fact, Stora is a highly appreciated historian in Paris and Algiers, but more obsequious on the other side of the Mediterranean.
And, to be seen well in an authoritarian state like Algeria, it is necessary to carry forward the official discourse, that of the glorification of the mujahideen of the war of independence and that of the oppression of colonial France. Therefore, working as Stora has specialized – on the subjective object par excellence which is memory – is ideal. This allows us to avoid anything that could disturb the Algerian state.
Kleptocratic state…
How can emerging historians promote a more inclusive understanding of history in authoritarian contexts?
Interview Between Time.news Editor and Historian Expert Benjamin Stora
Editor: Welcome, Dr. Benjamin Stora. Thank you for joining us today. You recently appeared on the show Politics C, where you discussed the balance between historical objectivity and state narratives, especially in the context of Algeria. Can you elaborate on your stance regarding the portrayal of history in relation to state discourse?
Stora: Thank you for having me. History is often inherently political, and in places like Algeria, it must navigate the complexities of official narratives. While I try to adhere to a scholarly approach, it is also important to acknowledge that discussing the Algerian War of Independence often involves glorifying the mujahideen and critiquing colonial France. This creates a delicate situation for historians like myself.
Editor: You mentioned the concept of becoming a “court historian.” How does that affect the integrity of historical research and memory in Algeria?
Stora: The term “court historian” implies that a historian may prioritize pleasing state authorities over presenting an unbiased account of history. In Algeria, where the government upholds a particular narrative about the War of Independence, historians risk their credibility if they deviate from this narrative. This can lead to a sanitization of history that overlooks critical perspectives and varied experiences.
Editor: That’s a significant concern. In your view, how does this dynamic shape public memory and education in Algeria?
Stora: It profoundly influences both. The glorification of certain figures and events creates a controlled memory that aligns with the state’s vision. As a result, the education system may propagate this narrow perspective, hindering critical engagement with the past. Younger generations might grow up with a romanticized view of history, without understanding the complexities and nuances involved.
Editor: Given these challenges, what role do you believe historians should play in promoting a more balanced understanding of Algeria’s past?
Stora: Historians should strive to provide a platform for diverse voices and experiences, even if it means facing backlash. Engaging with both local and international audiences can help broaden perspectives. Additionally, fostering dialog about historically marginalized narratives is crucial. This can offer a more nuanced understanding of Algeria’s history that includes the struggles and stories of all its people.
Editor: As an expert, what practical advice would you give to emerging historians in Algeria or similar contexts, where government narratives can be overpowering?
Stora: First, I would advise them to be aware of the political landscape and its implications for their research. It is essential to access multiple sources of information and engage in critical thinking. Networking with international historians and participating in conferences can also provide a broader platform for sharing ideas. Lastly, they should remain committed to truth, even in the face of pressures to conform.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Stora, for sharing your insights today. It’s clear that navigating the waters of history in authoritarian contexts is fraught with challenges but also full of opportunities for growth and understanding.
Stora: Thank you for the conversation. It’s critical we continue discussing these important issues.