The participation of the former Mekano was marked by tense exchanges with some panelists.
The last chapter of only Fama was marked by several moments of tension, especially when Romina Saezformer member of Mekano adn freind of Cathy Barrigajoined the program panel to talk about the judicial situation of the former mayor of Maipú.
The conversation revolved around the charges facing Barriga, who is currently in preventive detention accused of fraud against the Treasury and falsification of public documents. During the program, the panel composed of Daniela Aránguiz, Michael Roldan, Mariela Sotomayor, Paula Escobar and led by Francisca García-Huidobrodid not hesitate to mention the visit that Sáez made to the San Miguel prison, where Barriga is detained.
In addition, the journalist and writer was also present in the studio Laura Landaetawho has thoroughly investigated the history of the former television figure.
The tense moments of Romina Sáez with the Only Fama panel
On the night of Sunday, November 17, Romina Saez He did not hide his discomfort when he arrived at the studio and saw how the case of Cathy Barriga.
Because of this very reason, Mariela Sotomayor did not hesitate to rebuke the former dancer Soft at the outset, saying: “come get angry Romina”.
“I realized that this was a circus, they were all making fun, lying here on the ground, talking and everything,” Sáez responded.
“You are coming here to our house,” added the former participant of Win or Serve?, to which Romina, far from calming down, replied firmly: “You worked with Cathy, well, than do your research well.”
At that moment, Barriga’s friend emphasized her disagreement with the tone of the program: “They grabbed me at the door as I was leaving. “This is not a comedy show.”
Hearing this, Francisca García-Huidobro was noted: “I am the owner of this house, do you want to leave?”, which unleashed Romina’s fury even more. “Yes, I’m leaving,” he responded, and sure enough, he left the live set.
However, shortly after, Romina Sáez returned to the program after a conversation with Daniela Aránguiz, who asked him to calm down and come back to give his version.
After her presentation, which was marked by tense exchanges with some panelists, García-Huidobro took the chance to express her disagreement with what the lawyer had also said.
“I’m going to tell you something that you’re not going to like. And I’m sorry, I don’t buy you, I don’t believe you, I don’t think you are such a friend of Cathy Barriga. “I think you went to look for mocha and press from someone who is not as close to you as if I went to see, say, my best friend,” said the host.
Romina, far from remaining silent, also responded in harsh terms: “What you think, I don’t care (…) So, you are right because you are the driver?”
What ethical considerations should media outlets keep in mind when covering sensitive topics?
Interview between Time.news Editor and Expert on public Relations and Media
Time.news Editor: Good afternoon, and thank you for joining us today. Today, we’re discussing a rather heated episode from the recent chapter of the show Only Fama. it seems that the participation of Romina Saez, a former member of Mekano, created quite a stir. I’d like to introduce our expert in public relations and media, Dr. laura González. Welcome, Dr. González!
Dr. Laura González: Thank you for having me! I’m excited to delve into this topic.
Time.news Editor: So, let’s get right into it. The show featured Romina saez discussing the legal troubles of former Maipú mayor Cathy Barriga.What do you think led to the tense exchanges witnessed during the episode?
Dr.Laura González: Great question. Tension often arises in broadcasts like these when sensitive subjects, especially those involving legal complications and accusations, are discussed. Romina knew Cathy barriga personally, which likely added a layer of emotional complexity.As friends become adversaries in public spaces, it can create an explosive environment.
Time.news Editor: Absolutely. The charges against Barriga, including fraud against the Treasury and falsification of public documents, are severe. How do you think discussing these matters publicly impacts the individuals involved, especially Barriga?
Dr. Laura González: Discussing such serious charges in a public forum can have both positive and negative effects. On one hand, it can raise public awareness and encourage accountability. Conversely, it can led to notable personal and professional repercussions, compounding the stress on the individual already dealing with legal matters. For Barriga, the public scrutiny coudl exacerbate the perception of guilt, possibly influencing her case.
Time.news Editor: Speaking of perception, the show’s panel featured various personalities, including Daniela Aránguiz. How do you think the composition of the panel affects the dynamic of discussions,especially in a situation as charged as this?
Dr. Laura González: The composition of the panel plays a crucial role in shaping the discussion.Different personalities bring diverse perspectives, but they can also clash in ways that lead to tension. In the case of a legal topic involving a friend, panelists might struggle between their professional roles and personal biases. This can lead to heated exchanges that, while entertaining, can overshadow the factual discourse needed in such serious matters.
Time.news Editor: Indeed, tension can be quite engaging for viewers, though it risks overshadowing crucial topics. in your opinion, what duty do media platforms have when handling stories of this nature?
Dr. Laura González: media platforms have a significant responsibility to present stories ethically and factually. They must balance their intention to engage audiences with their duty to avoid sensationalism. Providing context, ensuring accuracy, and allowing for fair depiction of all involved parties are essential. If they fail in these areas, it can contribute to misinformed public opinion and potentially impact ongoing legal cases.
time.news Editor: That’s a great outlook, Dr. González. It’s clear that the intersection of media,personal stories,and legal issues is a complex terrain. Thank you for sharing your insights with us today!
Dr. Laura González: Thank you for having me! I hope our discussion sheds light on the intricacies of media ethics and public discourse.
Time.news Editor: That’s a wrap for today. Stay tuned for more engaging conversations on the latest in news and media!