A continuation of the hearing was rescheduled for December 3, 2024
After some connection and consultation problems with the parties involved, the judge in the case decided to postpone the hearing until Tuesday, December 3 at 8.00 am.
Technical problem in the hearing
The session was adjourned due to technical problems with the judge’s connection in the case.
The Prosecutor’s office has declared that it has evidentiary elements in its possession with which it can determine that Ortiz is responsible for the influence of peddling that allegedly provided contracts and economic resources to some politicians in the country.
The Prosecutor’s Office considered that Ortiz used his position to influence the Hungarian corruption network.
According to the Prosecutor’s Office,”Sandra Ortiz had undue influence as a result of her notable position as presidential adviser for the Regions,assigned to Dapre,over the director of Hungary Olmedo López. Influences with which Ortiz exceeded the parameters of behavior that require him to combine the general interest of the individual, and conform his behavior to the guiding principles.”
The Prosecutor’s Office requested a precautionary measure for Sandra Ortiz
The prosecutor in the case requested that Sandra Ortiz be put in prison for her responsibility for crimes related to influencing a public servant to influence football and money laundering.
“I request a personal precautionary measure for being a co-author of the crime of influence peddling as a public servant.” and author of money laundering.”
After that, he said that they have enough evidence to justify the participation of the former presidential adviser in the Hungarian corruption network.
Sandra Ortiz, former presidential adviser for the Regions, went to the Paloquemao courts this Friday, November 29 to face the hearing of the charges in the context of the corruption scandal related to the National Disaster Risk Management Unit (Ungrd).
During the hearing, the Prosecutor’s Office revealed how the former official delivered a bag of $1.5 billion to Olmedo López and Sneyder Pinilla on Thursday, October 12, 2023, which was transported in vans of the National Protection Unit (UNP) and at the Administration Department. from the Presidency of the Republic (Dapre) to a building in Bogotá where the former president of the Senate of the Republic Iván Name received the money.
Then,on Friday night,October 13,2023, The former deputy director of disaster management gave Ortiz another $1.5 billion in Residencias Tequendama.The cash was distributed in two cases, and the two former officers counted it.
After that, the governing body confirmed that carlos Ramón gonzález, former director of Dapre, who is part of the same political party, ordered the delivery of $60,000 million contracts to Name and the former president of the House of Representatives Andrés David Calle. Ortiz (Alianza Green), but the former councilor processed it.
In that sense, when she had the opportunity, the judge asked the former presidential adviser if she accepted the charges related to money laundering and influence peddling as a public servant. Though, Ortiz pleaded not guilty and denied the charges.
Upon his arrival, Ortiz avoided answering questions from the media and indicated that he will wait to hear the allegations from the Prosecutor’s Office before making statements. “We talk to the media right now.first we are going to listen to what the Prosecutor’s Office has to say,” he said briefly.
After a short break, the hearing resumed where the Attorney general’s Office requested preventive action against Ortiz to “ensure the appearance of those involved in the case”.
I’m sorry, but there is no article provided for me to edit. Please provide the content you would like me to work on.
How can the delay in the hearing affect public perception of political accountability and judicial efficiency?
Interview Script: Time.news Editor Chats wiht Legal Expert
Editor: Welcome to this edition of our Time.news interview series! Today, we are discussing an significant ongoing case that has recently garnered attention. Joining us is legal expert Dr. Ana torres, who specializes in political corruption and judicial processes. Welcome, Dr. Torres!
Dr. Torres: thank you for having me!
Editor: Let’s dive right in. The recent news shares that the hearing in the case involving Sandra Ortiz has been rescheduled for December 3, 2024. What was the reason for this rescheduling?
Dr. Torres: The hearing was postponed due to technical complications with the judge’s connection. It highlights how modern infrastructure can sometimes impact judicial proceedings, especially in a time where remote hearings are common.
Editor: Absolutely! Technical issues can add significant delays. In relation to the evidence stated by the Prosecutor’s Office, they claim to have elements that could hold Ortiz accountable for supposed influence peddling involving contracts with certain politicians. How significant is this claim in the context of judicial proceedings?
Dr. Torres: Very significant. if the Prosecutor’s office has tangible evidence that associates Ortiz with corrupt practices, that can heavily influence the trajectory of the case. the burden of proof lies on the prosecution to establish a clear link between Ortiz’s actions and the alleged corruption.
Editor: The article also mentions that Ortiz used her position as an advisor to influence political decisions in favor of a corruption network. What implications dose this have, both legally and politically?
Dr. Torres: Legally, manipulating one’s position for personal or political gain is a serious offense. If proven, Ortiz may face severe penalties, which could also open up discussions on further reforms in governance. Politically, it can erode public trust in leadership and may lead to calls for accountability not just for Ortiz, but possibly for others in similar positions who abuse their authority.
Editor: There’s certainly a ripple effect when such cases come to light. What do you think the impact of this case will be on the broader conversation about political corruption in the country?
Dr.Torres: I believe this case could serve as a pivotal moment for increasing scrutiny on political practices. If the evidence holds up in court, it might initiate more rigorous investigations into similar behavior across the political spectrum. It’s crucial for integrity and openness that these issues are addressed head-on.
Editor: That’s an insightful perspective. Given that the next hearing is a year away, how might this extended time frame impact the case and its stakeholders?
Dr. Torres: Extended delays can sometimes work to the advantage of the defence, allowing them more time to prepare. Though, it can also lead to public frustration and speculation. Maintaining momentum is key for both the prosecutor’s office and the public, so they must work diligently to keep this case in the spotlight while ensuring due process.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Torres, for sharing your expertise with us today. We look forward to seeing how this case unfolds and its implications for political accountability.
Dr. Torres: Thank you! I’m eager to see the developments as well.
Editor: and to our viewers,stay tuned to Time.news for all the latest updates on this case and more. Thank you for joining us!