The new agreement between Israel and Lebanon, according to Biden’s special envoy Amos Hochstein, substantially exceeds the 2006 agreements enshrined in UN Security Council resolution 1701.
Hochstein noted that unlike the previous agreement, which he said was “good words without a mechanism for execution,” the current agreement provides for the creation of a permanent structure under the leadership of the United States, with the support of France and other allied states.
This structure will provide support to the Lebanese army, and will also promptly check complaints about violations and eliminate them.
The diplomat emphasized that in the past,the obligations of resolution 1701 were not fulfilled by either israel or Hezbollah,although the latter,according to him,violated it to a greater extent. The new agreement, on the contrary, creates conditions for effective control and prevention of violations. Hochstein noted that this would not be a temporary measure, but a permanent mechanism.
Hochstein expressed confidence that the new agreement opens up a real chance to strengthen stability in the region through international control and support.
Biden called on Netanyahu to help secure a hostage deal in a call before announcing a ceasefire in Lebanon.
What are the main components of the new Israel-Lebanon agreement compared to previous agreements?
Interview with Amos Hochstein: Key Insights on the New israel-Lebanon Agreement
Editor: Welcome, Mr. Hochstein. Thank you for joining us today to discuss the significant developments regarding the new agreement between Israel and Lebanon. Can you start by explaining how this agreement differs from the 2006 agreements under UN security Council resolution 1701?
Hochstein: Thank you for having me. The new agreement substantially exceeds the framework established in 2006.While the previous agreement offered “good words without a mechanism for execution,” this new deal lays out a concrete structure for implementation. It is designed to be permanent, led by the United States, with support from France and othre allied nations.
Editor: That sounds promising. Can you elaborate on what this permanent structure will entail, especially regarding its role in maintaining peace?
hochstein: Certainly. The new mechanism will actively support the Lebanese army, providing it with the resources and training necessary for effective governance. Additionally, this structure will facilitate timely checks of any complaints regarding violations. This is a considerable advancement over the past, where obligations outlined in resolution 1701 were not adequately fulfilled by either Israel or Hezbollah.
Editor: So, you’re saying that this agreement creates better conditions for enforcement and monitoring of compliance?
Hochstein: Exactly. In the past, violations were rampant, especially by Hezbollah. The new framework introduces a system for effective control over potential violations and seeks to prevent them. This isn’t a stopgap; it’s designed to be a permanent solution that builds stability through ongoing international support.
Editor: Regarding the regional context, what do you think are the implications of this agreement for stability in the Middle East?
Hochstein: This agreement offers a genuine possibility to strengthen stability in the region. By establishing consistent international control and support, we can foster a more secure surroundings. Both United States and France are committed to ensuring the efficacy of this structure,which stands as a promise of long-term peace in an area that has faced many challenges.
Editor: There has been mention of a hostage deal following President Biden’s call to Prime Minister Netanyahu. How does this fit into the broader framework of the agreement and ongoing relationships in the region?
Hochstein: The call for a hostage deal is crucial. It highlights the need for pragmatic solutions amidst complex geopolitical tensions. Engaging in diplomacy over contentious issues like this sets a precedent for cooperation and can help ease some immediate tensions, thus supporting the broader aims of the new agreement.
Editor: Mr. Hochstein,what practical advice would you give to our readers regarding the importance of this agreement? How can individuals engage with or understand these international developments?
Hochstein: I encourage readers to stay informed about international agreements and their implications.Understanding the dynamics at play can enhance public discourse. Individuals can engage by advocating for diplomacy and supporting policies that promote peace and stability. Monitoring how these agreements unfold will also provide insights into the evolving landscape of global politics.
Editor: thank you, Mr. Hochstein, for sharing your valuable insights on this significant growth. We look forward to seeing how this agreement impacts stability in the Middle East moving forward.
Hochstein: Thank you for having me. It’s crucial to keep the conversation going on these critically important issues.