Russia’s Vice Foreign Minister “continuously reviews” resumption of nuclear tests

by times news cr

Russia’s Deputy Foreign Minister‍ mentioned that the possibility ⁤of resuming nuclear testing is continuously being reviewed.

In an interview with TASS⁣ news agency reported on the 30th (local⁣ time), Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov was asked whether Russia would resume nuclear testing in response to ‍the U.S. escalation,saying,“To speak without any prejudice,the⁢ situation is very serious.” “It’s complex,” he said, “and every component and every aspect is ​constantly being reviewed.”

Also, regarding U.S. President Joe Biden’s request to congress for⁢ $24 billion in additional aid to⁤ Ukraine,Ryabkov said,”The White House is using every opportunity left for the ​lame duck president to harm us and prevent us from carrying out the task of special ⁣military‌ operations.” “I felt like they were⁤ preventing them from doing it,” ⁤he said, adding, “But they won’t succeed.”

Last year,Russian President ⁣Vladimir Putin announced ⁤the suspension of participation in ‍the New START Treaty,which aims to limit strategic nuclear warheads between the united States and⁢ Russia. The United States requested Russia to ​inspect nuclear facilities, but Russia refused and declared that it would stop participating in the treaty.

additionally, President Putin recently‌ approved a revision to the nuclear doctrine on the‍ 19th. Accordingly, Russia considers it a ‘joint attack’ when⁣ there is the participation or support of a nuclear weapons state, even⁣ if​ the attacker is a non-nuclear‌ weapon state.

[서울=뉴시스]

⁢ rnrn

Hot news now

  • What are the potential consequences of Russia’s ‍suspension of the New START Treaty on global nuclear arms control? ​

    Interview between Time.news Editor and Nuclear Policy Expert

    Editor: Good afternoon, and welcome‍ to Today’s Special Coverage​ on Global⁣ Security. I’m here with Dr. elena Petrova, a leading expert in nuclear policy and international relations.Thank you ⁤for joining us, Dr. Petrova.

    Dr.⁤ Petrova: Thank you for having me. it’s a pleasure to be here.

    Editor: Let’s dive right into the recent comments made by Russian Deputy Foreign Minister sergei Ryabkov. He mentioned that Russia is continuously reviewing the possibility of​ resuming nuclear testing. How ‌important is this statement in the current ⁣geopolitical climate?

    Dr. Petrova: It’s quite significant. Ryabkov’s⁢ remarks not only reflect Russia’s stance amid rising tensions, ‌especially⁤ with‌ the U.S., but also signal‌ a potential shift in‌ thier military strategy. The fact that they are keeping their options open for nuclear‌ testing suggests a broader concern about security ⁣and deterrence,⁢ which indicates⁤ that the strategic dialogue between the U.S. and Russia is deteriorating.

    Editor: He also ‍referred to the situation as “serious” and “complex.” ‌What do you make of that characterization?

    Dr. Petrova: Those‌ terms are carefully chosen. ⁤they imply that ⁢Russia sees itself in a ‍precarious ​position, weighed down by a mix of internal challenges and external pressures, especially regarding the U.S. support for ​Ukraine. It shows that they are contemplating various scenarios where resuming nuclear testing might be viewed ‌as a necessary step for national security.

    Editor: Speaking of⁤ Ukraine, Ryabkov commented on President ⁤Biden’s recent request for additional ⁢aid to Ukraine, suggesting that the U.S. is trying to impede⁢ Russia’s operations. How might this plan affect ⁢the current balance of power?

    Dr. Petrova: The U.S. aid is crucial for Ukraine’s defense capabilities at a time when the conflict has reached a critical⁢ phase. Though, from Russia’s outlook, this could be seen as an aggressive move and may further motivate them to enhance their ⁣military posturing,⁢ including nuclear capabilities. The interplay of military aid and strategic provocations can create an escalating spiral that risks miscalculation on either side.

    Editor: Ryabkov also mentioned the suspension of Russia’s participation in the New ‍START Treaty, which‍ was aimed at limiting strategic nuclear warheads. How does this impact global nuclear stability?

    Dr. Petrova: The suspension of the New START Treaty is a concerning advancement. this treaty has been a cornerstone of nuclear arms control between the U.S. and Russia. With its suspension,we’re losing a critical mechanism ⁢for⁤ transparency and trust. It raises the stakes for‌ an arms race and diminishes the prospects for future negotiations on nuclear disarmament.

    Editor: Russia has revised its ‍nuclear⁢ doctrine recently, deeming a joint attack ​as a reason to perhaps deploy nuclear weapons. What ‌does this revision meen for international relations?

    Dr. Petrova: This revision is quite alarming. It broadens the threshold for nuclear‍ response, undermining decades of carefully negotiated norms around nuclear use. It could create a ⁣security habitat where smaller conflicts​ can escalate into nuclear confrontations, as nations may feel justified in using nuclear weapons under⁢ the guise of ‘joint attacks.’ It underscores the urgent need for ⁣renewed dialogues on nuclear risk reduction.

    Editor: Thank⁢ you for sharing these ​insights, Dr. Petrova. As ​we can see, the landscape of global security is shifting rapidly, and the implications of these developments are profound.We appreciate your expertise on this complex issue.

    Dr. Petrova: Thank you for the opportunity to discuss this crucial topic. It is‍ indeed crucial that we remain informed and engaged about these global security issues.

    Editor: And thank you to our viewers for tuning in.Stay informed and ⁢engaged,as the situation ⁣continues to evolve.

You may also like

Leave a Comment