BJ, a woman in her 30s, arrested and indicted for stealing 800 million won from Kim Junsu’s blackmail by “spreading recordings”

by times news cr
ⓒNewsis

AfreecaTV’s⁢ female BJ, who​ extorted more than hundreds of millions of ‍won worth ​of money by ⁢threatening singer and ⁣musical actor Kim Junsu (Xiah Junsu) from the group TVXQ, was detained and handed ‍over to trial.

The Uijeongbu District ⁤Prosecutors’ Office announced on the 2nd that it had arrested and ‍indicted Afreeca TV BJ, ‌a woman in her 30s, on the 28th of last month on charges of blackmail under the Aggravated Punishment‍ for ⁣Specific⁣ Economic Crimes Act.

Mr. A is ​accused of stealing 800 million ​won by threatening ⁤Mr. Kim from September⁤ 2020 until recently.

It was discovered that Mr. A recorded the conversation wiht Kim Junsu and ​threatened to distribute it on social networking services‍ (SNS).

Previously, Kim Junsu’s agency, Palm Tree Island, issued ⁢a statement and said, “Mr. A recorded the conversation with Kim Junsu ​for illegal purposes and threatened to spread it on social media.” “I know there is nothing‍ wrong with Kim Junsu, but celebrities are not true.” Even if ‌just one⁤ article comes out​ that isn’t true, Kim Junsu’s image will be tarnished,‍ and as Kim Junsu⁢ can’t appear on broadcasts, he won’t be able ⁣to recover his⁣ image again. Though, he continued to make threats, starting​ with the statement that he had nothing to lose.”

[의정부=뉴시스]

  • 0dog
  • What legal consequences can individuals face if they are accused of extortion in South Korea, especially in the entertainment industry?

    Interview Between Time.News Editor and Legal Expert on Recent Extortion Case Involving ​AfreecaTV BJ

    Time.News ⁣Editor (TNE): Good day, everyone. Today, we’re diving into a compelling and concerning ⁣case in ⁤the entertainment industry involving a female broadcaster from AfreecaTV. She has been accused of extorting a significant amount of money from well-known singer and musical⁤ actor Kim Junsu, a member of the renowned group TVXQ. To discuss the legal implications and​ the broader context of this case, we⁤ have with us legal expert and entertainment law specialist, Dr. Lee. ​Welcome, Dr. Lee.

    Dr. Lee (DL): Thank you for having me. It’s a pleasure to⁢ be here.

    TNE: Dr. ⁣Lee, could you provide us some background on the specifics of this case? What exactly happened, and what ⁣has the Uijeongbu District Prosecutors’ Office announced?

    DL: Certainly. The incident involves a female BJ, who allegedly extorted hundreds‍ of millions of won from Kim Junsu by threatening to release damaging information or potentially compromising materials ⁢about him. The Uijeongbu District Prosecutors’ Office has confirmed that she has ‌been detained⁢ and‌ is ‍set ​to stand trial for these charges.Such acts are taken seriously in South Korea, especially⁤ given​ the high-profile nature of ‌the⁣ individuals involved.

    TNE: It’s⁤ quite shocking to hear about⁤ extortion in the entertainment world. How does this type of crime generally impact the individuals targeted, not just ‌financially but emotionally and professionally?

    DL: The fallout from extortion can be significant. For the victim, it can ‌lead to severe emotional distress, infringement on privacy, and⁣ damage⁢ to one’s reputation. professionals in the entertainment industry, especially, ⁣face immense pressure to maintain their public image. Additionally, they may ⁣also be reluctant to come forward or seek help due to​ fear of public scrutiny or backlash.

    TNE: That brings ⁣us to a crucial point—discussing these issues in the public sphere. How does the legal⁢ system handle such sensitive matters, especially involving figures who are under the public eye?

    DL: The legal system applies the ⁢same principles,‌ but cases involving public figures can become more complicated due to⁤ media coverage. Authorities often⁢ try to balance the right to a fair trial with the public’s interest ⁤in the case. Additionally,not infrequently,public pressure can ‌influence the speed and severity of the judicial process. In this scenario, the‍ prosecution is likely acutely aware ‌of ⁤public sentiment⁢ surrounding both the‌ accused and the victim.

    TNE: In this digital age, how does⁢ the proliferation of social media and streaming platforms like AfreecaTV ⁣influence both the nature of​ such crimes and the ⁢way they ⁣are prosecuted?

    DL: Social media has a double-edged effect. On one hand, it ​increases the chances of ‌such crimes occurring, as individuals can misuse their platforms anonymously or leverage ⁤their influence‌ for malicious purposes. on ⁣the other hand, it also empowers victims to gather ⁤support and share their ⁣experiences, raising awareness‍ about these ‍issues. Legal frameworks are ‍gradually ​adapting to address these ‍dynamics, considering the unique challenges posed ‌by the digital landscape.

    TNE: That’s very insightful. As we move forward, what recommendations would you ‌give to public figures to protect themselves from such potential threats?

    DL: First and foremost, it’s crucial for public figures to be vigilant about ‌their​ digital​ footprint ‌and the⁣ information⁢ they share online. Employing legal representation or consultancy to navigate any potentially risky interactions is also advisable.⁤ Furthermore, establishing robust support systems, both personally and professionally, can help individuals manage their mental health and seek ​appropriate legal recourse swiftly if needed.

    TNE: Thank you,Dr. Lee.This topic is both critically important‌ and complex, and yoru viewpoint adds tremendous value to our‌ understanding of it. ​We appreciate your time​ and insights today.

    DL: Thank you for having me. I’m glad to shed light on this issue, and I ‌hope‌ the conversation continues ‌to promote awareness and protective ⁢measures in the entertainment industry.

    TNE: Absolutely! This is a developing story, and we will continue⁢ to follow it closely. Thank you to our audience for joining us in⁤ this⁣ critical discussion.

    You may also like

    Leave a Comment