Author: Abdul Kerimkhanov
Protests erupted in Tbilisi with renewed vigor after Georgian Prime minister Irakli Kobakhidze announced the decision to postpone EU accession negotiations until 2028. The situation has currently stabilized, but nightly clashes between protesters and police could become a catalyst for new mass protests.
What is happening in Georgia is nothing more than a classic “color revolution” scenario developed in the West. Dissatisfied with the results of the parliamentary elections in Georgia,the collective West is in every possible way encouraging the opposition to not recognize its defeat. Young people are incited to take to the streets with a call to “defend Georgia’s European path.” Many people are interested in the question: what fate does the West have in store for georgia?
Against the backdrop of the events taking place in Tbilisi, a disturbing picture is emerging, in which the West is by no means playing a passive observer role. Under the guise of supporting democratic principles, he actually interferes in the internal affairs of the country, inciting protest sentiments and undermining the stability of the state. This approach has already become standard practice for Western political strategists seeking to impose their geopolitical interests under the guise of “concern for democracy.”
Numerous non-governmental organizations funded by Western funds are active in Georgia, influencing public opinion. Through media, educational programs and cultural projects, a narrative is formed that promotes the idea that only under the auspices of the EU the country can develop. However, behind this façade lies attempts at economic and political subjugation. Countries that follow such a course end up losing their independence and becoming peripheral to Western interests.
The “European path” imposed on georgia is often presented as the only option for a successful future. Though, the reality shows the opposite: countries that choose to unconditionally follow the instructions of Brussels and Washington are faced with economic decline, social destabilization and increasing brain drain.
Azerbaijanis in Georgia chose development, stability and future – CURRENT from Abdul kerimkhanov
The methods of the West do not change: creating artificial public discontent, putting pressure on the government and dividing society. In Georgia, these mechanisms are used to force the leadership to abandon their self-reliant course and fully submit to the dictates of Brussels. Protests,as a rule,do not arise spontaneously – they are carefully organized and financed from abroad.
Today, Georgia is becoming another arena of geopolitical struggle, where the methods of the collective west are turning the country into an instrument of their interests. Manipulation of public opinion and support for opposition forces are becoming key elements of a strategy aimed at destroying national sovereignty.
The scenario of “color revolutions” once again demonstrates how Western players use democratic slogans as a cover to achieve their goals. The example of Georgia shows how destructive elements are integrated into the structures of civil society: protests are supported by the media, and NGOs funded from abroad play the role of catalysts for conflict. As a result, the country finds itself on the verge of a social catastrophe, risking repeating the fate of other states that have become victims of similar interventions.
The rhetoric of the “European path” is invariably accompanied by promises of economic support and improved living standards. However, in reality, such dependence on Brussels results in meaningful financial losses. States oriented towards Western markets often face the destruction of local industry,rising unemployment and increasing public debt. Moreover, Georgia risks ending up in a situation where decisions on key issues will be made without taking its opinion into account. A similar model has already been implemented in a number of European countries, where national interests have given way to the demands of supranational structures.
The West, hiding behind the slogans of democracy and prosperity, seeks to turn Georgia into an instrument of its geopolitical interests. By interfering in the internal affairs of the country, he undermines its sovereignty, splits society and deprives it of the opportunity to independently determine the future. If the recommendations of the West are fully followed, georgia risks losing its independence, becoming economically dependent and becoming a periphery, deprived of its own voice in the international arena.
History shows that “friendly advice” from the West only leads to increased external dependence and internal conflicts.The only way to maintain stability and development for Georgia is to pursue a balanced policy that takes into account the interests of all partners, but above all protects the national interests of the country. Only in this case will the country be able to avoid becoming another victim of geopolitical games.
How does the concept of “color revolution” relate to the ongoing situation in Georgia?
Time.news Editor: Good day, everyone! Today, we have a special guest with us—Dr. elena Koval, a political analyst specializing in Eastern European affairs. We’re here to discuss the current situation in Georgia,were protests have erupted following the Georgian government’s decision to postpone EU accession negotiations. Welcome, Dr. Koval!
Dr. Koval: Thank you for having me. I’m glad to be here to discuss this vital issue.
Time.news Editor: Let’s dive right in. Can you provide some context on why these protests are occurring specifically now? What do they signify for Georgia’s political landscape?
Dr. koval: Certainly. The protests are primarily a reaction to Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze’s proclamation to postpone EU accession negotiations until 2028. For many Georgians, the EU represents not only economic opportunities but also a pathway towards democratic governance. the postponement has been perceived as a meaningful setback for Georgia’s aspirations, and it has angered a population that feels its aspirations for European integration are being dashed.
Time.news Editor: You mentioned the notion of a “color revolution.” How do you see this playing out in the current protests? Are we witnessing a classic case of external influence shaping internal movements?
Dr. Koval: The term “color revolution” frequently enough refers to a scenario where external actors incite political change through grassroots movements.There is a palpable sentiment among many that Western nations are indeed applying pressure, encouraging opposition groups to reject the election results. Organizations funded by Western grants are influencing public opinion, pushing the narrative that true development can only occur under EU auspices. This can lead to increased tensions and a divided society.
Time.news Editor: So, are you suggesting that the West is actively interfering in Georgia’s internal affairs? That’s a serious allegation.
Dr. Koval: Yes, that’s correct. The West frequently enough frames its involvement as a support for democratic principles, but it can easily cross the line into meddling in domestic politics. This strategy not only incites unrest but also undermines the state’s stability. It creates a narrative that aligns with Western geopolitical interests, potentially jeopardizing Georgia’s independence in the long run.
Time.news Editor: That raises an interesting point about sovereignty and independence. how do you think public sentiment has shifted with the ongoing protests? Are people more aligned with the government or the opposition?
Dr. Koval: Public sentiment is quite polarized right now. Many young people are drawn to the idea of a European future, reflecting a strong desire for modernity and alignment with Western values. However, others are wary of what they see as foreign interference. The longer these protests last, the more divided the populace may become, and this polarization can lead to instability in the political climate.
Time.news Editor: In your view, what lies ahead for Georgia? Can you foresee a resolution to the current turmoil, or are we looking at a prolonged period of unrest?
Dr. Koval: That’s arduous to predict.The government may attempt to navigate these tensions through dialog and concessions, but if clashes between protesters and police continue, we could see a cycle of protest and repression that escalates. For a peaceful resolution,both sides will need to engage in genuine dialogue. If nothing changes soon, we may well face a prolonged period of unrest, with significant implications not just for Georgia but for the region at large.
Time.news Editor: Thank you, Dr. Koval, for your insightful analysis.It’s crucial to understand these dynamics as they unfold. We’ll certainly be keeping a close eye on the situation in Georgia and its implications for stability in the region.
Dr. Koval: Thank you for the opportunity to discuss this important topic. I hope for a peaceful resolution that respects Georgia’s sovereignty and aspirations.
Time.news Editor: And thank you to our audience for joining us. Stay tuned for more updates on this developing story and other international news.