Clarification on strike 3 December

by time news

Metropolitano de Lisboa regrets the inconvenience caused to customers due to the strike called by the Workers’ ​Representative Organizations on the morning of Tuesday, December 3. The company did everything‍ to avoid this strike and​ remains committed to ‍maintaining negotiations with workers to end these differences.

In a negotiation meeting held on Monday, December 2, Metropolitano de ​Lisboa presented‌ concrete and credible proposals to ⁤the trade union organizations, adopting the procedures ‌demanded​ for the years 2023 and beyond, regarding ⁣the majority of the values ‍variable works are involved (four of the seven cases under discussion), also⁣ suggesting that negotiations regarding the ​variables continue othre, as well as⁣ a review of the Professional Regulations, according to the proposal⁤ that the company has ‍already⁤ presented.

With this ‍opening made by Metropolitano de Lisboa to find fair solutions for the benefit of all the parties involved, it did not receive‌ the⁣ necessary ‌support from‍ trade union organizations, despite ⁣the progress made and the constructive spirit of lead the negotiations.

Metropolitano de Lisboa regrets that, despite ‌its efforts, ⁢it was not possible to reach an agreement that would lead to the immediate improvement of the remuneration conditions of its workers and avoid the inconvenience of the strike to⁣ its customers.

Therefore, he hopes that ‍a structural and lasting understanding will be possible at the meeting already scheduled to continue the negotiations.

Metropolitano ⁢de Lisboa‌ reiterates that, at the moment, there is no debt or late payment to its workers.

How can Metropolitano de Lisboa improve its negotiations with Workers’ Representative ​Organizations in the future?

Interview: Addressing the Recent Strike⁣ at Metropolitano de Lisboa

Editor, ‍Time.news: Today we have the ​pleasure‌ of speaking with Dr. Miguel ⁤Santos, an expert in⁣ transportation labor relations, to⁤ gain deeper insights into the recent strike called by Workers’ ‌Representative Organizations⁣ at Metropolitano de Lisboa. Thank you⁣ for joining us, Dr. Santos.

Dr. Miguel Santos: Thank⁣ you for having me.‍ It’s a critical time, ‍and ⁤I’m pleased to discuss the implications of these developments.

Editor: To ​start, can you summarize what led to the strike at Metropolitano de Lisboa on December 3?

Dr. Santos: ⁣Certainly. The strike ‌stemmed‍ from unresolved negotiations between Metropolitano‍ de Lisboa and the trade union organizations representing the workers. Despite ⁢the company’s efforts, including presenting ‍credible⁤ proposals regarding variable work payments for 2023 and beyond, the unions felt their⁢ demands were not adequately met. This gap in interaction and understanding ultimately led to the strike.

Editor: Metropolitano ​de Lisboa expressed regret over the strike and indicated they had made progress during negotiations. What are the implications of this situation for both the company and the workers?

Dr. Santos: The company’s regret​ signifies a recognition of the ⁤impact that strikes have on commuters and operational efficiency.‍ For workers,continued negotiations are ⁤crucial as they seek better remuneration and working conditions. the strike itself can strain‌ relationships but also serve as ‌a catalyst for more genuine dialog. If managed properly, it could led to more substantial agreements that benefit both ⁣parties in the long term.

Editor: You mentioned the proposals made by Metropolitano de Lisboa. How notable are these proposals,and what specific aspects do they address?

dr. Santos: The proposals addressed several variable‌ work values, with four out​ of seven ⁣cases involving compensation adjustments.Additionally, the company is ⁤suggesting a review of ​Professional Regulations, which could redefine job roles and expectations. These adjustments are significant as they align future⁣ remuneration with the realities of the job, perhaps leading to a more satisfied workforce.

Editor: The article‌ notes‍ that Metropolitano de Lisboa has no‌ current debts or late payments to workers. How does this factor into the⁢ negotiations?

Dr. Santos: this is an essential point. It reflects⁢ the company’s⁢ financial health and willingness to invest‌ in its ⁣workforce. By ensuring no debts exist, Metropolitano de lisboa positions itself as a responsible employer, which could be a strong bargaining chip. ‌It may also enhance trust, encouraging unions to engage⁤ more constructively in negotiations.

editor: ‍ Moving forward,⁤ what practical ⁣advice would you give to both the management of Metropolitano de Lisboa and the Workers’ Representative Organizations?

Dr. Santos: For management, I’d advise⁤ maintaining clarity⁣ in ‌negotiations and being open to union feedback. It’s ​crucial to foster an environment where both sides feel heard.‌ For the unions, patience is key; while advocating strongly for worker rights, it’s also⁣ essential to recognize the company’s constraints and willingness to negotiate. A collaborative ⁣approach will yield the​ best results.

Editor: Lastly, what are ⁤your⁢ predictions for the upcoming scheduled meeting⁢ between the two parties?

Dr. Santos: If both sides approach the meeting with a genuine‌ willingness to listen and compromise, ⁣I believe there is potential for a groundbreaking agreement. The success will hinge⁣ on their ability to find common ground and build a lasting understanding that addresses the concerns raised by the workers while ensuring operational efficiency for metropolitano de Lisboa.

Editor: Thank you, Dr. Santos, for⁤ your valuable insights on this⁣ pressing issue. Hopefully, both parties can reach an agreement that⁤ benefits everyone involved.

Dr. Santos: Thank you for having me. It’s crucial​ for⁤ such discussions to⁤ happen, ⁣and I remain optimistic about the ⁢possibilities.


For more insights into labor relations in public transportation, stay tuned to Time.news.

You may also like

Leave a Comment