“Now it’s payday”
Heino wins trial against his ex-manager
02.12.2024Reading time: 1 Min.
Singer Heino took on his ex-manager in front of the Hamburg Higher Regional Court. Now the verdict has been pronounced.
Another success for Heino. The singer argued with his former manager over outstanding fees. Now he has also won in the second instance before the Hamburg Higher Regional Court.
The court joined the regional court in the process and sentenced the manager to pay 76,470 euros plus nine percent interest since November 2019, as a court spokeswoman said upon request. The court did not allow an appeal.
“If you go to court at the age of 80 and then get the second-instance verdict at the age of almost 86, then you are happy that you can still experience that.The mill of justice grinds slowly, but fairly,” Heino told the German press -Agency.”Now it’s payday!”
Heino had already had most of his claims recognized in the first instance before the Hamburg Regional Court in 2023. Even then, the sum owed to Heino was more than 100,000 euros. It should now be around 125,000 euros, said Heino’s new manager, Helmut Werner.
It was about fees for several appearances and an autograph session that the ex-manager still owed him. The court decision was unanimous and the ex-manager must pay the full court costs. When asked,he initially did not comment on the new court decision.
What are the key lessons for artists to learn from Heino’s court victory over his ex-manager?
Interview: Heino’s Victory Over His Ex-Manager and Its Implications in the Music Industry
An In-Depth Discussion With Legal Expert Jonas Richter
Time.news Editor: Today, we’re joined by legal expert Jonas Richter to discuss the recent court victory of renowned singer Heino against his ex-manager over outstanding fees. Heino’s trial concluded successfully at the Hamburg Higher Regional Court, where he was awarded €76,470 plus interest dating back to November 2019. Jonas, can you provide some context on this case and its significance?
Jonas Richter: Absolutely. Heino’s case exemplifies the critical nature of contractual agreements in the music industry.After dragging on for years, the final court decision serves not just as a personal victory for the artist, but also as a reminder of the importance of diligently managing professional relationships and ensuring that all terms are fulfilled. In this instance, Heino had initially filed for over €100,000, encompassing fees from several performances and an autograph session.
Time.news Editor: This verdict is pivotal, especially considering Heino’s age. How does age factor into such legal proceedings?
Jonas Richter: Age can certainly add emotional weight to a case. Heino, at almost 86, expressed his relief and joy upon receiving the verdict, encapsulating how prolonged legal disputes can be daunting, especially later in life. This highlights a broader issue — artists may sometimes feel pressured to let go of their claims fearing they won’t have the time or energy to pursue them thoroughly. In Heino’s situation, persistence paid off, and this is an encouraging message to others navigating similar disputes.
Time.news Editor: The article mentions that the court realized Heino’s claims were valid. What implications does this have for othre artists in the industry?
jonas Richter: the outcome of this trial reinforces the importance of contract clauses and ensuring appropriate legal counsel is involved from the onset. Many artists may overlook contractual details,particularly when building careers,potentially missing out on rightful earnings. This case can serve as a legal precedent, demonstrating that artists can—and should—fight for their rights.
Time.news Editor: Could you share some practical advice for artists who find themselves in disputes similar to heino’s?
Jonas Richter: Certainly! First, artists should always have clear, written contracts detailing payment terms and services rendered. Regularly reviewing these agreements and maintaining good communication with managers and other industry professionals can preempt many conflicts. Collaborating with a learned attorney specializing in entertainment law is crucial to navigate disputes effectively. Lastly,keeping detailed records of all performances,sessions,and payments helps strengthen one’s position in case of future discrepancies.
Time.news Editor: Heino mentioned, “The mill of justice grinds slowly, but fairly.” What insights does this offer about the legal process in the music industry?
Jonas Richter: That phrase beautifully captures the essence of the legal journey—justice is often not immediate, and patience is critical. In the music industry, given that artists may face important hurdles in obtaining due payments or enforcing contracts, the legal system can seem daunting. However, as demonstrated in Heino’s case, perseverance can lead to rightful resolutions.
Time.news Editor: Thank you, Jonas, for shedding light on this important case. It’s encouraging for artists to see that justice can be served, even after years of struggle.
Jonas Richter: Thank you for having me. It’s vital for the music community to stay informed about their rights and the avenues available for seeking justice. Heino’s case reinforces that, no matter the age or circumstance, standing up for oneself is always worthwhile.
This interview provides insights into the implications of Heino’s court victory, highlighting the importance of contracts and the need for legal counsel in the music industry. For updates on similar cases, stay tuned to Time.news.