Because young women are more progressive and some young men are insecure

by time news
Ms. Quenzel, young women currently cope better with changes ​in society than⁢ young men.This‌ was demonstrated by Shell’s youth study, which you co-authored. Why?

Young women have invested a lot in their education, which is why, on average, they ⁢face the challenges of school and training with more ⁤ease and serenity. They are also more relaxed when it comes to the reconciliation of work and family or the‌ consequences of a pluralistic society. This has to do with the⁣ emancipation ​movement of the last 30 years. Many young women⁤ benefit from this.

Gudrun​ Quenzel​ is ​co-author of the Shell youth study‌ and ‌an educational sociologist at‍ the Vorarlberg University of Education.Shell Youth study
But the world isn’t rosy for young women either. The gender pay gap is still ⁢large, the top ⁤40 DAX companies are​ mostly led by men, and women carry out​ 72 billion hours‍ of unpaid care work every year.⁤

Yes, that’s true, but there’s also the ⁤other side.In recent times, women have taken on more and more management

As more and ​more groups in society desire power, prestige and recognition, ​this comes at the expense of those who were previously highly privileged. There is no infinite number of ⁣great positions; this applies to both business and politics.

But this also has consequences. You can see ‍it in the family. My ​father said: that ‌works, that doesn’t work. Today everyone talks, the children, the wife. When it comes to your vacation destination, when it comes to the question of whether to get a​ pet. The family has become more democratic, compromises must be found. Many people think this is positive, even young women and young men. But not all young‌ people. And this is understandable. They are giving​ up the privileges that their‍ fathers ‌still had.

After the publication of our ⁤study, there was a lot of talk about the alleged rightward‍ shift among young people. To understand better: if you look at both ⁤genders over⁣ time, you can see that women have become more and more progressive. They are also currently the most progressive ‍and idealistic, while⁢ materialistic values ​​are becoming more significant among young people again. At the same time, most young people have moved further⁣ to the left. But the part‌ that⁢ was already further to the right has moved further to the right. These young people are ⁤quite hostile to modernization, have a very ‍conventional mentality and relatively ‍troubled by the tough times they are currently experiencing.

It doesn’t have so much to do with a real ‍disadvantage as it does with the feeling of ⁣being disadvantaged or having something to ⁣lose. These are young people who feel that changes in the economy and job market – artificial intelligence, automation, globalization – are taking away their control over their lives.

While most young ‍people believe in a better future, this group has lost faith in it. You see that the jobs are becoming more⁤ challenging and that more is required. That – to put it bluntly – it’s no longer good to work in‌ silence.The fact that as a craftsman you are now pushed into the lower middle class ⁢due to the tendency to study. That well-paid

Couldn’t this uncertainty be addressed with better training?

To some extent this is certainly possible. But in the long term our society will also have to find answers to the question of how to deal with those who​ do not have good opportunities in the modern⁣ labor market. So far I⁢ don’t think it’s being talked about widely.

Politicians like Maximilian⁢ Krah of the AfD seem to have long recognized ​the plight of young ⁣people and specifically address it with‌ their Tiktok messages.

I sometimes watch ‌right-wing populist election ads with my students. I have the feeling that⁤ its‌ creators had already foreseen‌ the results of our study. The fears, insecurities or identity issues that we highlight are taken up in these commercials and skilfully filmed in a socio-educational way.

Let’s⁤ take the question of the‍ budget and who should be responsible for it. The message of an advert ⁢would be more or less this: ‍“Who likes washing ‍dishes then?‍ Obviously me neither.” The audience should get the⁢ feeling: It’s perfectly fine if you think housework is women’s work. You are fine just the way ‍you are.

Our study shows that we have a small group, in our typology “progressives”, who are not sensitive to right-wing election advertising. For all other groups there are individual issues on which they are susceptible to right-wing populism. In essence,it can be said that young people in East Germany have the same fears as young people⁢ in West Germany – of war,of‍ economic⁢ uncertainty –‌ but that these ⁣fears are stronger. Just like⁤ dissatisfaction with democracy. This is even more pronounced among young‌ men in East Germany than​ among women, especially⁤ if they‌ do⁣ not‌ have⁤ such a high educational ​qualification.​ I suspect that many of parents’​ and grandparents’ fears of decline are passed on to young people, but we have not investigated this.

For a long time, the symbol of disadvantage was the Catholic girl in the country: as she was Catholic, she had less access to education, because she was a girl, this ‍was reinforced and ‌there were fewer opportunities in the country anyway.Today this multiple disadvantage affects children with a migrant background who grow up in big cities. They are the ones who experience the greatest⁣ disadvantages in the system. Simultaneously occurring, optimism for the future is particularly high among recently arrived migrants. they know that it will be

more difficult for them, that maybe they won’t be able to get a promotion, but ‌first they see the many opportunities they⁢ have in Germany.

– What insights did Gudrun Quenzel share about the impact of education on young‍ women’s‍ adaptability to societal changes?

Time.news Interview: ⁢Navigating Change – Insights from the Shell Youth Study wiht Gudrun⁣ Quenzel

Editor: Welcome, Ms. Quenzel. It’s​ a pleasure to have you here today. Your recent work on the Shell youth study has sparked significant discussions about gender disparities among young‌ people. You found ​that young women tend to adapt⁢ better to societal changes than young men.What do you attribute this trend to?

Gudrun quenzel: Thank you for having me.It’s a complex issue, but one major factor is the investment that young women have made in their education. they approach ⁣challenges—whether in school or​ in their training—more calmly and confidently. ‌This has also given⁢ them a distinct advantage in ​balancing work and family life. the emancipation movement over the past three decades has played a crucial role in shaping these‍ experiences.

Editor: That’s captivating. While young women are ​navigating these changes⁣ effectively, there are⁣ still pressing issues like the gender ⁢pay​ gap and underrepresentation in leadership ‌roles. How do we reconcile these achievements with ​the hurdles that remain?

Gudrun ‍Quenzel: Indeed, while ‍young women have made strides, challenges remain significant. For instance, women still perform a staggering 72 billion hours‍ of unpaid care ‍work ​annually. Though, the increasing ⁤presence of women in management positions shows a positive trend.It reflects both a societal shift toward recognizing‍ women’s ‌capabilities ‌and a response to the increasing demand ⁣for diverse leadership.

Editor: ‍ And this drive for⁢ power and recognition seems to impact conventional family dynamics as well. You mentioned that families are becoming more democratic. Could you elaborate on that?

Gudrun Quenzel: Yes,the family dynamics are evolving. In contrast to previous generations, where decisions were frequently enough‍ made unilaterally by a male figure, ⁣today, families are engaging in discussions⁤ and compromises. This shift can be seen in various family decisions, from vacation destinations to ⁢pet ownership. while many view this democratization as a positive ‍development, it does create⁤ challenges, especially for those ‌who are accustomed to the privileges enjoyed by earlier generations.

Editor: So, this evolution is not without⁣ its tensions. You’ve observed a rightward shift ⁢among‍ some ​young people in response to these changes. Can you ⁤unpack that ⁤a bit further?

Gudrun Quenzel: Certainly. It’s pivotal to note that while women are becoming more progressive and idealistic, ⁤some young men, particularly‍ those already leaning conservative, are feeling ​increasingly threatened by modernization. ⁢Changes in the economy, driven by factors like artificial‍ intelligence and globalization, can create a sense of displacement for these individuals. They face concerns about losing control over their own lives and livelihoods.

Editor: That sounds like a very precarious situation. How can society address the feeling of disenfranchisement among these young people?

Gudrun quenzel: Addressing this requires a multifaceted⁣ approach. Encouraging open⁢ dialog about these feelings is essential. Communities and educational institutions must create environments where young people can express‍ their anxieties and receive the support they need. Policies that emphasize job security and training for‍ future skills can also help rebuild trust in the future. This approach can foster ‌a sense of agency, countering that feeling of‍ disadvantage.

Editor: It’s clear that navigating‌ these societal changes requires both individual resilience and collective action. What‌ message would you like to convey to both​ young women and men as they face ⁤these challenges?

Gudrun Quenzel: ⁢I ‌would emphasize the importance of embracing change while⁤ also advocating for their rights. Young women⁣ should continue to strive for equity, and young men should recognize that adaptation is crucial in this‍ evolving landscape. ⁤Both groups need to support one another and work collaboratively to build a future that is ⁣inclusive and ‌equitable⁤ for all.

Editor: Thank you, Ms.Quenzel. ⁣Your insights are incredibly valuable, especially ⁢in these transformative times. It’s evident that understanding and addressing the ⁤perspectives of both genders will be crucial as we move​ forward.

Gudrun Quenzel: Thank you ​for the possibility. Engaging in this dialogue is fundamental to fostering a healthier, more inclusive society.

You may also like

Leave a Comment