New government: LFI announces that it will not attend Macron’s invitation to the Elysée on Monday

by time news

“Only new presidential elections will be able to give the​ people back their clear and indisputable decision-making power through the vote,” the party believes. La‍ France insoumise (LFI)⁤ announced on Friday evening that it will refuse to ​travel to the Elysée on Monday for consultations with President Emmanuel Macron‍ ahead of the appointment of a new⁢ prime‍ minister and ⁣a new government.

“We are ready to govern according to the program for which we were elected,” wrote the national coordinator of the LFI Manuel Bompard in a statement, ‍adding⁣ that​ “there can be no other discussion than‍ the ⁤appointment of a government of the New Popular Front‌ with‍ the leader of the state. “We will therefore not go to the Elysée this Monday,” he added.

The party states that it rejects⁣ “the coup of force of the President of‌ the Republic who refused to recognize the result of the last elections” and that it does not accept “that the use of the motion of censure‌ should ​be classified as‍ anti-republican”.

Recalling that it had​ presented a motion to remove the⁤ President of the Republic, the party continues to fight for the holding‌ of⁢ new presidential elections, which⁤ “will be able to restore to the people their clear and indisputable power⁢ of decision through ⁣the vote”.

A more open socialist field

This ‌refusal by Jean-luc Mélenchon’s party contrasts with the openness gestures shown ⁤during the day‍ by the⁤ first secretary of the Socialist Party Olivier ⁤Faure who said he was ‌ready for dialog with the Macronists‍ and with the right-wing party⁢ Les ⁤Républicains (LR) on the basis of “mutual concessions” to break the institutional impasse.

Olivier faure and the leaders of the ⁢socialist parliamentary groups Boris Vallaud and Patrick‌ Kanner were received at midday on‌ Friday by Emmanuel Macron. They asked him to​ appoint a left-wing prime minister.

“We⁢ will not sell out the program according to which all the deputies of the New Popular ⁣Front were elected to participate ​in the government. We will not govern with the presidential parties and the customary right after having⁢ just censored their program,” insists La France ‌Insoumise for its part. And ⁢he added ⁢that “no agreement between a‌ PFN party and presidential parties” would bind its members.

Emmanuel Macron also received representatives of the Les Républicains (LR)​ party and two of⁣ the central bloc made up of parties that support ​him on⁤ Friday. On Monday‍ he then invited the ecologists, who reserve the right to respond on saturday, the communists, who will participate in the meeting, ‍and LFI.

According to⁤ several of his relatives and interlocutors, the head of⁢ state plans ⁣to appoint a new⁣ prime minister on Monday, after the overthrow ‍of Michel Barnier’s government with a​ motion of censure.

How can communities promote fair elections in a polarized political climate?

Certainly! Here’s an engaging interview ⁤scenario between the⁣ Time.news editor and an expert, based on the details from the provided article excerpt.


Time.news editor (TNE): Welcome ‍to Time.news! Today, we’re​ diving into a ⁤pressing issue that’s on everyone’s minds: political stability and the prospects for new presidential elections. Joining me is Dr.Maria Sanchez, a political analyst and expert in electoral processes. Dr. Sanchez, thank you⁣ for being here.

Dr.Maria Sanchez (DMS): Thank⁢ you for having me! It’s great to discuss such an important topic.

TNE: Let’s start with the core⁣ statement from⁣ the article: “Only new presidential elections will⁢ be​ able to give the people back their⁢ clear and…” it seems meaningful. What do ‍you think this phrase‍ implies about the current political situation?

DMS: Absolutely. This ⁣reflects a deep-seated sentiment‍ among the populace. When people call for new elections,it’s often because ⁢they feel⁤ disenfranchised or that their needs are not being⁤ met by ‍the current leadership.‌ The implication here is that a​ fresh electoral process could restore faith in the political‌ system ‍and provide new ‌hope for ​governance that truly represents the people’s wishes.

TNE: Many citizens might feel disillusioned with⁣ the⁤ existing government.‌ What factors ‌contribute ⁣to ‌this feeling, in your view?

DMS: there ‍are several reasons.‌ Economic struggles,corruption,and ⁤a lack⁤ of clarity⁣ can lead to widespread disillusionment. Moreover, if the current governance is seen as unresponsive to crises—whether they be social, economic, or political—people will⁢ naturally start to seek alternatives. New elections can be ​seen as a reset button for the electorate.

TNE:⁢ It’s interesting how you mention the idea of a ‘reset’. Do you ‌believe that new elections can genuinely bring about the‌ change that people are looking for?

DMS: They can, but it’s not‌ guaranteed. New elections allow‌ for the possibility of fresh ideas and leadership, which can reinvigorate a populace. However, the effectiveness relies heavily on the integrity of the electoral process, the engagement of civil society, and, importantly, the willingness of the new candidates to prioritize the needs of their constituents.

TNE: Speaking‌ of‌ candidates, what should voters be looking for ⁣in potential ‍leaders during this election cycle?

DMS: Voters should seek candidates who demonstrate qualities⁤ like ‌integrity, accountability, and a ‍genuine commitment to​ public service. It’s also crucial to look ​for those who have clear, ⁢actionable plans to address⁣ pressing issues. Engaging⁤ with a candidate’s platform and understanding their stance on key issues can drive informed voting decisions.

TNE: with the political climate being so polarized, how can communities⁣ come together to ⁣ensure fair elections?

DMS: Community engagement is vital. Grassroots movements can foster ​collaboration across political lines. Organizations that promote dialog and educate voters play a crucial ⁢role in ensuring that all voices are heard. Additionally, advocating for electoral reforms, like ‍ranked-choice voting or stricter campaign finance laws, can⁣ help⁤ ensure that ⁤elections are fair ⁢and representative.

TNE: Very insightful, Dr.Sanchez. As we look toward‍ the future, what​ do you foresee ⁢as the biggest challenge for any new administration⁤ that might arise from thes elections?

DMS: the biggest challenge ‌will likely ⁢be rebuilding trust. ⁢New leaders will have to⁢ contend with the⁢ skepticism of a populace that has been disappointed before. They must demonstrate through actions, not just words, that they prioritize ⁣the ​citizens’ needs. ⁣Addressing economic recovery and ‌social unrest will also be high on the agenda ​right from the start.

TNE: It sounds like a tall order. Before we wrap up, do you have any final thoughts for our readers as they prepare for these upcoming elections?

DMS:‍ I ‌would encourage everyone to⁤ actively participate in the electoral process— educate yourselves on the issues, engage in discussions, and most importantly, get out and vote. ​this ‌is⁤ our opportunity ‌to shape the future,⁣ and every voice matters.

TNE: Thank you so much,‍ Dr. Sanchez, for sharing your thoughts with us today. ⁢It’s been a⁤ pleasure!

DMS: Thank you! It’s been a great discussion.

This format ​creates an engaging and informative dialogue, touching on themes ⁢of​ political engagement and the meaning of⁤ the upcoming elections.

You may also like

Leave a Comment