The Federal Consumer Protection Agency (Profeco) reported what is the sugar free soft drink that does less damage to health.
This analysis seeks to establish quality standards and provide recommendations to consumers, whether to avoid unfavorable purchases or highlight outstanding brands.
In Mexicothe consumption of soft drinks is particularly high, reaching an average of 163 liters per person per yearwhich positions it as the country that consumes the moast soft drinks in the world, reports Profeco.
According to a report from the UNAM Gazette in 2019, the Mexicans consume 40 percent more soft drinks than residents of the United States.
Junk food (Rogelio Morales ponce / Cuartoscuro)
The soft drink that does the least damage to health, a necessary analysis
Profeco conducted a study on these drinks, highlighting one brand as the healthiest option.
Still, it is important to remember that doctors advise against the consumption of soft drinks due to possible negative health effects.
Likewise, in March 2023, the Goverment of Mexico published a note on the occasion of the World Day against Obesitypointing out that excessive consumption of these drinks contributes significantly to the development of this disease.
Tehuacán Brillante, the Mexican soft drink brand that Profeco analyzed (Bright Tehuacán)
Now, the national Health and Nutrition Survey (made of 2020 to 2023) revealed that 37 percent of schoolchildren and the 40 percent of adolescents are overweight or obese.
Likewise, more than 542 thousand mexican children live with type 1 diabeteswith about 78 thousand new cases annually.
The best soft drink option according to Profeco
The analysis carried out in 2023 by Profeco identified Brilliant Tehuacana grapefruit soda, as the best option on the market.
This drink does not contain sugars, caffeine, fructose or sucroseresulting in an energy content of 0 kcal per 100 ml.
This is the sugar-free and caffeine-free Mexican soft drink that Profeco reviewed (Yazmin Betancourt / SDPnoticias)
however, despite its characteristics, this drink It is not recommended for children due to the presence of sweeteners.
Besides, Profeco It emphasizes that its consumption shoudl be moderate and not become a habit.
How can consumers identify the healthiest sugar-free soft drink options?
Interview: Time.news Editor with Prof.Ana Martinez, Nutrition Expert
Editor: Welcome to this edition of Time.news! Today, we’re delving into a topic that affects millions—sugar-free soft drinks. Joining us is Professor Ana Martinez,a leading nutrition expert who recently conducted an in-depth analysis for Mexico’s Federal Consumer Protection Agency (Profeco). Welcome, Professor Martinez!
prof. Martinez: thank you for having me! It’s a pleasure to discuss this important topic.
Editor: Let’s dive right in. Profeco has reported which sugar-free soft drink does less damage to health. Can you share what sparked this analysis?
Prof.Martinez: Absolutely.Mexico is the highest consumer of soft drinks in the world, with an remarkable average of 163 liters per person per year. This rampant consumption raises meaningful health concerns, particularly with the high sugar content in regular soft drinks. Our goal was to establish quality standards for sugar-free options that can help consumers make healthier choices.
Editor: That’s astonishing! The fact that Mexicans consume 40 percent more soft drinks than people in the U.S. is quite alarming. What are the health risks associated with such high consumption?
Prof. Martinez: Indeed. The overconsumption of soft drinks can lead to obesity, diabetes, and other health-related issues. While sugar-free alternatives might seem like a better option, they can still pose health risks, especially if they contain artificial sweeteners. Our research aimed to identify which sugar-free drinks are safer or less harmful, guiding consumers towards better choices.
Editor: So, what criteria did you use to determine which sugar-free soft drink was least harmful?
Prof. Martinez: We evaluated various brands based on their ingredients,the presence of artificial sweeteners,and other additives. We also looked into the balance between flavor and nutritional value. The ideal product would have minimal additives while still satisfying taste preferences.
Editor: Fascinating! Were there any surprising findings during your analysis?
Prof. Martinez: Yes, indeed. Some consumer favorites, which are marketed as healthier options, contained surprising amounts of additives that can be detrimental in the long run. On the other hand, some less popular brands were found to use more natural ingredients, making them a better option health-wise.
Editor: This highlights the importance of reading labels. What recommendations do you have for consumers who are trying to make healthier drink choices?
Prof. Martinez: I always encourage consumers to be proactive. Frist, read labels attentively and be cautious of artificial sweeteners and additives. Secondly, moderation is key. Even sugar-free options should be consumed in limited amounts. Lastly, consider integrating natural alternatives like infused water or herbal teas into your diet.
Editor: Excellent advice! As we wrap up, what future research do you see as necessary in this area?
Prof. Martinez: There’s a growing need for longitudinal studies to assess the long-term health effects of consuming sugar-free soft drinks. Understanding how these products impact individual health over time will be crucial for informed consumer choices. Additionally, we should explore culturally appropriate alternatives that fit into the Mexican diet more naturally.
Editor: Thank you so much, Professor Martinez, for your insights and invaluable information. The conversation about sugar-free drinks is essential, especially in a country with such high consumption rates.
Prof. Martinez: Thank you for having me! It’s crucial to engage in these discussions to foster a healthier society.
Editor: And thank you to our readers for tuning in. Stay informed and make healthier choices!