court revokes Korea Communications commission sanctions against MBC for excluding it from boarding private planes and citing Newstapa
Korea Communications Commission recognizes procedural illegality… korea Communications Commission “Response including review of ruling”
The court canceled the Korea Communications CommissionS (KCC) legal sanctions that took issue with MBC’s report citing ‘exclusion from boarding the presidential plane’ and the ‘Kim Man-bae-Shin Hak-rim’ Newstapa interview. The Korea Communications Commission is reviewing the appeal.
On the 10th, the 8th Administrative Division of the Seoul Administrative Court (Chief Judge Lee Jeong-hee) ruled in favor of the plaintiffs in both lawsuits filed by MBC against the korea Communications Commission requesting cancellation of sanctions.
Previously, the Korea Communications Standards Commission (KCC) held a plenary meeting on October 16 last year and decided to issue a ‘caution’, taking issue with MBC Radio’s broadcast of ‘Kim Jong-bae’s Focus’ quoting Newstapa’s ‘Kim Man-bae audio file’. did it The National Security Commission also issued a ‘caution’ on the MBC News desk on October 30 of the same year for reporting only a one-sided position regarding the ‘exclusion of boarding the presidential plane’.
The Korea Communications Commission confirmed these sanctions through a resolution in January. MBC objected to this and filed a lawsuit to cancel the sanctions in Febuary and also applied for a suspension of execution.
It is reported that the court acknowledged the procedural illegality of the Korea Communications Commission’s disposition.
the Korea Communications Commission is expected to appeal this court ruling. An official from the Korea Communications Commission said, “We plan to analyze the contents and respond appropriately as soon as the ruling is released.”
Previously,the Seoul Administrative Court also canceled the 15 million won fine imposed on MBC’s ‘PD Notebook’ for quoting Newstapa’s ‘Kim Man-bae-Shin Hak-rim’ interview last October. In response, the Korea Communications Commission pointed out that there were errors in the court’s ruling and decided to immediately appeal.
[서울=뉴시스]
-
- great
- 0dog
-
- I’m sad
- 0dog
-
- I’m angry
- 0dog
Hot news now
What are the potential consequences for the Korea Communications Commission after the court’s decision on MBC?
Interview: The Implications of the Court’s Ruling on MBC and the KCC Sanctions
Editor: Thank you for joining us today. We have a lot to unpack regarding the recent judicial ruling that revoked the sanctions imposed on MBC by the Korea Communications Commission. To shed light on this matter,we have Dr. Soo-jin Lee, a renowned media law expert. Dr. Lee, can you provide us with some context about why the KCC issued sanctions against MBC in the first place?
Dr. Lee: Absolutely, thank you for having me. The sanctions were primarily based on two incidents. Firstly, MBC faced criticism for including a report that suggested the presidential plane’s boarding practices were biased, effectively excluding certain journalists. Secondly, KCC sanctioned MBC for airing content from Newstapa, which involved an audio recording with meaningful implications. The KCC argued that MBC’s coverage was one-sided and could mislead the public.
Editor: Captivating. It seems like there’s a lot at stake regarding media freedom in South Korea.The court ruled that the KCC’s actions were procedurally illegal. What does that mean for the KCC and its authority moving forward?
Dr. Lee: The ruling implies that the KCC overstepped its boundaries in the process of sanctioning MBC. Procedural illegality suggests that they may not have adhered to proper protocol or guidelines when issuing those sanctions. It raises questions about the KCC’s authority and could lead to a reassessment of how they regulate media. If they are not following established procedures, it undermines their ability to uphold standards without appearing biased or arbitrary.
Editor: So it’s a significant win for MBC, but what does this mean for the broader media landscape in South Korea?
Dr. Lee: This ruling is pivotal. It reinforces the notion of media freedom and the right of news organizations to report on matters of public interest without the threat of unfounded sanctions. It may set a precedent for other media outlets facing similar issues. It also encourages a more transparent and accountable regulatory surroundings, which is crucial for democracy.
Editor: In the wake of the ruling,the KCC has indicated it will review the judgment. What are the potential next steps for both MBC and the KCC?
Dr. Lee: the KCC might either choose to rethink its regulatory framework or appeal the ruling to a higher court. For MBC, this is an chance to reaffirm its commitment to investigative journalism and continue reporting on pertinent issues. It will be interesting to see if the KCC alters its approach or if this leads to further legal disputes.
Editor: thank you, Dr. Lee, for your insights. Are there any final thoughts or implications you would like to share regarding this situation?
Dr. Lee: Just that we are at a crucial juncture for media rights in South Korea.This ruling doesn’t just impact MBC; it sends a clear message about the importance of journalistic integrity and the need for a regulatory body to operate within the bounds of the law. A healthy democracy relies on a vibrant press that can freely convey facts without fear of retaliation.
Editor: Thank you once again for your valuable outlook, Dr. Lee. We look forward to seeing how this situation evolves and its impact on the future of media in South Korea.