Trump: “Now Zelenskyy wants a ceasefire too…” “I plan to lead the end of the war.”

by times news cr

“I want a peace agreement wiht Ukraine… “This is ⁤news”
“Putin admits defeat and now is the time to ⁣move ⁢forward with ⁤a peace agreement.”
“If allies pay enough, I think NATO is ‌good.”

US President-elect Donald ​Trump claimed that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky wanted a ceasefire. President-elect trump met with president Zelenskyy and French President Emmanuel Macron at the Elysee Palace on the occasion of the reopening of ⁤Notre Dame Cathedral.

In⁤ a‍ phone interview with the New​ York Post published on the 8th (local time), President-elect Trump⁤ recalled his meeting with President Zelensky the previous day and‍ said, “He⁢ wants peace. “This is new news,” he emphasized.

“He wants a ⁣ceasefire. “He wants peace,” he said.⁢ “We‌ did not discuss specifics. “I think now is the ​time (to sign⁢ a cease-fire agreement),” ​he explained.

In addition,“We talked with President ⁢Zelenskyy ​about ways to end the bloody conflict that has been going on since 2022. ​“I am working on a concept on how to end this absurd war,” he said,⁤ adding, ⁣“He is ready for ⁣peace.”

“Russian President Vladimir Putin must‌ think‌ that now is the right time because he lost,” he said. “If we ​lost 700,000 (troops), now is the ‍time.” “(Casualties) will not end‍ until peace comes,” he pointed out.

This is the first meeting between President-elect Trump and President Zelensky since the U.S. presidential election.

Regarding ​the conversation with President Macron, President-elect Trump said, “We had a conversation regarding ⁤the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). “I repeatedly emphasized that the⁣ alliance must ⁢pay its ⁢fair share,” he said. “I said I like NATO as long​ as it pays‍ the costs.”‍ But when I first⁢ got involved in ​NATO, ‌no one paid anything. “Didn’t you ⁣end up paying the cost only after I ​got involved?”⁤ he pressed.

[서울=뉴시스]

Hot news now

How ⁢might the international‍ community react to Trump’s claims about Zelenskyy⁤ adn the desire for peace in​ Ukraine?

Interview Between ⁢Time.news Editor‌ and ⁢International Relations Expert on trump’s‍ Peace Initiative with Ukraine

Time.news Editor (TNE): ‌Welcome‍ to our special segment! Today we have Dr. Elena Morales, an expert in international relations, to discuss the ​recent⁢ interactions between President-elect Donald Trump, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of⁣ Ukraine, and how it might lead‌ to a potential peace agreement ⁢in the ongoing conflict with ⁤Russia. ‌Thank you for joining us, Dr. Morales.

dr. Elena Morales (EM): Thank you for having me! It’s great to⁤ be⁢ here.

TNE: So, let’s ⁣dive‍ right⁣ in. Trump recently asserted that⁢ President​ Zelenskyy⁣ desires a ceasefire and is ready for peace. How ‌meaningful is ‌this assertion in the context of‌ Ukraine’s current situation?

EM: It’s ​certainly noteworthy. For ​Trump to claim that Zelenskyy wants peace is⁢ quite a ⁤departure from earlier narratives that characterized Ukraine as primarily focused‍ on military resistance. This shift could ​indicate a‌ change in⁤ strategy, not just for Ukraine, but also for how Western allies might approach‍ negotiations moving forward. If there’s an openness to dialog, it’s a crucial step in⁤ potentially easing ⁢the humanitarian crisis and ceasing ‍hostilities.

TNE: Indeed.⁢ During his meeting at the Elysee Palace, Trump talked about working on⁤ a concept‌ to end what⁢ he termed an “absurd war.” Do you ⁤believe this could mark a new diplomatic approach in⁣ resolving​ the conflict?

EM: Absolutely. The term ​”absurd war” carries a lot of weight and ​reflects a growing sentiment among leaders⁤ about the need⁣ for a resolution. If Trump can unify ‍Western powers—including ⁢NATO—around a common goal for peace, this could reshape the dynamics​ of the conflict. However,‌ it’s crucial that any concept he proposes takes into account the complexities on the ground in Ukraine and the objectives of Russia.

TNE: Speaking of Russia, Trump implied that President​ Putin recognizes the need for peace due to significant casualties on their side. Do you ⁢think this⁤ acknowledgment signifies a turning point​ for Russia?

EM: It could be. ⁣Acknowledging defeat‍ is a major step, especially for Putin, who has historically framed the conflict in‌ terms of strength and territorial gain. Such admissions may signal a recognition of the untenable costs of prolonged engagement. Though, whether ​it translates into⁤ genuine willingness to negotiate remains to be seen. Historically, Russia has been reticent to make concessions.

TNE: The casualty figures mentioned—700,000 ⁤troops—are alarming and underscore the war’s human toll.How might this ⁢influence‌ public opinion both in ​Russia and Ukraine regarding the continuation of the war?

EM: High casualty numbers can considerably sway public sentiment. ⁣In Russia,with mounting losses,there may be growing discontent among citizens,changing perspectives about the war and potentially pressuring putin ⁣to pursue a peace⁢ agreement. Conversely, in ​Ukraine, the stress of ongoing​ conflict ‍amid these losses could bolster​ calls for a ceasefire, especially if the population‍ sees a desire for peace ⁣from their⁤ leadership.

TNE: Trump emphasized​ that “casualties will not end until peace comes.”‍ What steps should be taken to facilitate this peace process effectively?

EM: Effective peace-building requires a multi-faceted approach. First,establishing a clear and mutual ‍understanding of ‍terms ⁤is vital.⁢ This involves involving‌ key stakeholders, including NATO allies and perhaps neutral parties for mediation. Additionally, human rights considerations must be at the forefront, ensuring​ accountability for crimes committed during the war. Lastly, addressing⁢ the economic impacts ⁤on⁣ both nations will be crucial for building⁢ a sustainable peace.

TNE: Those are insightful points. ⁣As the world watches ‍these developments closely, what‍ do you foresee as the ⁢potential next ⁤steps for Ukraine⁤ and the⁤ international ​community?

EM: I think we may‌ see a series of ⁣diplomatic talks ramping up, possibly ⁤facilitated ‌by European leaders. If Trump’s administration takes a lead role in these negotiations, it could stabilize‍ the situation. However, it will require balancing interests—Russia’s ambitions,⁢ Ukraine’s sovereignty, and NATO’s strategic ⁢positions. The willingness for ‌compromise will be key to making any progress toward peace.

TNE: Thank⁤ you, Dr. Morales, for sharing your expertise⁤ with us‍ today. These discussions are vital as we navigate through these challenging ​times.

EM: Thank ⁢you for having me! It’s crucial that we keep these conversations going.

TNE: Absolutely. We look forward to seeing how the situation unfolds. Thank you to our audience for tuning in. ‍Until next​ time!

You may also like

Leave a Comment