Question for Parliament regarding the extension of IRIS

by time news

Milena Apostolaki brings to ‌Parliament the issues related to the ​upgrade of the IRIS payment‍ system, the reduction of transaction‌ costs for citizens ⁣and the control of opaque bank fees and commissions.

To⁢ expand IRIS system throughout the market ⁤and the need to introduce measures to prevent and eliminate⁢ excessive charges and bank supplies she focuses her ‌question on the Minister ‌of the National Economy and Finance, ‌Kostis Hatzidakis, the MP for the Northern Sector of PASOK and head of the Sector for Banks, ‌Private Debt – Loan Protection, Milena Apostal.

The PASOK member of parliament accuses the government of delaying the mandatory market-wide implementation of the IRIS system, which, she says,⁣ would have given banks⁢ a lot of time “willingly or in unknowingly” to further increase their fees.

Simultaneously occurring he notes that the ‌Government it is indeed beyond⁣ all control of a ‌series of ‌charges and commissions as well and from ⁢any‍ legislative initiative to protect⁢ citizens and improve openness in ‍banking⁢ transactions.

“The ⁤way the banks operated resulted⁤ in the creation of a cartels in the banking system and ⁤as a result earn millions of euros and cause incomprehensible harm​ to the citizens with their high fees” emphasizes ‍Mr. ‌Apostolaki in ⁤her question ‌and she asks,among other things,Kostis ⁤Hatzidakis if the⁤ Government intends to limit ‍the -transaction to change businesses⁣ through the IRIS system as ⁤well as whether it will take measures ⁢to prevent ⁤and eliminate opaque and unfair‍ charges ⁤and ⁣fees in​ interbank electronic transfers in loan agreements or credit.

Milena Apostolaki’s detailed question:

To ⁢the Minister ⁣of⁢ National Economy⁣ and Finance Konstantinos Hatzidakis
Topic: Upgrading the IRIS payment system – Reducing citizens’ transaction costs – Controlling opaque bank fees and charges.

Minister, Mr

The IRIS payment system facilitates daily transactions for millions of citizens and businesses, who ‍are or else burdened with​ inconsistent, inconsistent fees. Because of this very⁤ reason,PASOK planned⁤ to increase the 500 euro‌ limit that is in force today‌ in the IRIS‍ payment system.

On 4.12.2024 the DIAS SA Board of Directors ⁤will decide to establish a separate portal for two of the IRIS products. It was⁢ decided that the daily limit for direct money transfers between friends would be 500 euros and that the daily limit for direct payments to freelancers/individual proprietors would also be 500 euros. Before the ‌statement from the Governor of the Bank⁢ of⁢ Greece was given in‍ his television interview (28.11.2024, ERTnews) in which he stated that ‌the 500 euro limit in IRIS can be increased, because IRIS is a triumphant system. and there is no need for a new payment system. He saeid ⁢typically “We have invested ‌in it (IRIS), it is going very well, so we have ⁣to see what are its problems, fix them, expand it and make a national payment system of”. Even⁤ tho this initiative is moving in the right direction, it is‍ indeed not enough to significantly​ reduce the cost of transactions ⁤required by citizens.

Minister, you promised in‍ your⁤ previous statements that IRIS will be mandatory for the whole market in⁣ the Spring. ⁤You recently repeated ⁢this promise in your⁢ public ⁢intervention.

but so far you have not presented any ⁢plan as to ⁣how you intend to implement the‌ above notice. By⁢ your ⁢decision to⁤ delay the‍ mandatory IRIS for the entire market, voluntarily or involuntarily, you are giving the Banks enough time to further increase their fees. The Government refrains from any⁢ control over thes fees and commissions, just as it refrains from any legislative initiative to protect citizens and ​improve transparency.

All this‍ at a time when ⁣only a ⁤year ago, on 21.12.2023,the Competition Commission proceeded to⁣ impose fines on⁣ systemic banks of a total of ⁣41,756,180.10 euros for violating the terms of free competition in the⁢ individual markets ‌of⁢ retail and business banking , issuing and accepting cards. , ‍and also the markets of interbank systems, payment services and electronic transactions. As a result of the way the Banks acted, ‍cartels​ were ⁢created in the banking ⁤system and as ⁣a result they earned millions of euros and caused incomprehensible harm to the citizens with their high fees.The​ decision ⁤in ​question, which took 4 years to issue, as the⁤ audit began in November​ 2019, ​ended the dispute resolution process, ie the⁤ Banks accepted‍ the‍ violations ⁤they ⁢had committed‌ against a smaller fine, which they ‌”care” about their 4 billion net profit in 2023.

Mr. Minister, already with the no. first 1108/2024 in my question I pointed out ​that the Banks continue to​ offer challenging low deposit​ rates,and that the interest spread between new deposits and loans increased ⁣to 5.33 percentage points, due ⁤to
which has already launched a new investigation⁢ by the Competition Commission.To my question, a month‍ after submitting it, you ⁤have not responded. So far, you have not made any initiative regarding the‌ exorbitant fees and the almost ‌zero interest rates on deposits, except that the ⁣Prime ‌Minister has⁤ hastened to ensure that he is not going to tax the profits of⁢ the Banks, which he refuses to PASOK’s proposal to tax‍ them.

Based on the above, ask Mr. minister:

1)​ When ‌will it happen? implementation ​of ​IRIS is mandatory ⁤ for all firms to reduce transaction costs?

2)​ The ​Government⁤ intends to undertake it origin ​so that the transaction⁤ limit through the IRIS payment system for business transactions being separated from​ the other two as determined by the DIAS Board decision? What will be the position of the Government regarding the limit of transactions with⁣ businesses?

3) What measures dose the Government intend to take for​ the prevent‌ and eliminate excessive charges and feesin electronic ⁣interbank transfers and‌ existing or new payment systems? Why ⁢to this⁣ day does the Government refuse to‌ take measures, ​without paying attention to PASOK’s⁤ proposals, which ⁣are needed as a‍ common acknowledgment?

4)⁢ what measures does the Government intend to take ⁣for the accelerate the⁤ imposition of​ fines and‌ decisions ⁣of autonomous supervisory⁤ authorities ‌ and what interventions does it intend to make to control opaque ⁣and unfair charges‍ and commissions in bank accounts (eg management ⁤costs) but also in ⁤loan or credit agreements?

5) What measures does the Government intend ‍to take for the better supervision⁢ of banks and dealing with​ imperfect if not dirty competition⁢ in the Greek banking system?

What are the main benefits‍ of upgrading the IRIS payment system for consumers and small businesses?

Interview Between Time.news Editor and Milena ​Apostolaki on Upgrading the IRIS​ Payment System

Time.news ‍Editor: Good morning, everyone, and welcome ⁢to our engaging discussion on a pressing​ issue affecting ⁤our financial landscape—transaction costs and banking clarity. Today,we’re blessed to have wiht us Milena Apostolaki,a member of Parliament representing ‍PASOK⁢ and‌ an astute advocate for the upgrade of the IRIS payment⁢ system. Welcome, Milena!

Milena Apostolaki: ⁤ Thank you for having me! it’s a‍ pleasure to ‍be here and discuss ‌such an important topic.

Editor: To kick things off, could you explain what the IRIS payment ⁣system is and why ‌it’s significant for citizens and businesses?

Apostolaki: Absolutely. The ⁤IRIS payment system is designed to facilitate daily transactions for millions of citizens and small businesses by providing a ‌more efficient and cost-effective method for electronic payments. However, currently, many users face issues with inconsistent and high fees ‌attached to⁣ these transactions, which ​is what we aim to change.

Editor: ⁤You recently raised concerns regarding the government’s delay in implementing IRIS across the entire market.What⁢ implications do you believe this has⁣ on ⁣consumers?

Apostolaki: Delays in implementing the IRIS system allow banks to ‍exploit the situation.without mandatory adoption, ‌banks have had the prospect ⁢to increase their fees—either knowingly or unknowingly. This not only ⁢burdens consumers with higher costs,‍ but it also⁢ creates⁣ a lack of transparency in what they are paying for.

Editor: You mentioned‍ issues surrounding the ‍opaque bank fees and commissions. Can you elaborate on that and the potential impact on everyday citizens?

Apostolaki: Certainly. Opaque fees‍ lead to confusion and mistrust among consumers. Many citizens are unaware of the charges associated with their transactions, which can sometimes amount to significant sums over ⁣time.‌ The lack of clarity in these charges contributes to a perception of collusion—a sort of cartel behavior among banks. This is why it’s essential to implement regulations that protect consumers and enhance ‍transparency in the banking sector.

Editor: In your questions directed​ at the Minister of National Economy and Finance, Kostis Hatzidakis, you address plans to increase the transaction limit within the IRIS system. How do you envision this change affecting consumers?

Apostolaki: Increasing the transaction ⁤limit is vital for both personal and business transactions.As it stands, a 500 ​euro limit for direct transfers can be quite ‍restrictive for many users, especially freelancers and small ​business owners. By ⁤raising this limit, we‌ can alleviate some financial pressures, making it easier for people ‌to transact without incurring​ excessive⁣ fees.

Editor: You’ve called for legislative initiatives to restrict unfair charges. What kind of measures do ‌you think are necessary to create a⁤ more equitable banking environment for⁣ consumers?

Apostolaki: We need comprehensive legislation that not only caps transaction fees but also mandates disclosure of all charges ‌upfront. We must ensure that customers have access to​ clear and transparent data regarding the services they⁤ are utilizing. Additionally, establishing a regulatory framework ‍to oversee interbank transactions will help hold financial institutions accountable and encourage fair ⁣competition.

Editor: You alluded to the need for ⁣a more transparent ‍banking system. With the current landscape, do you believe the government‍ has the political will to drive these changes?

Apostolaki: It’s certainly a challenge, but the concern for‌ citizens must take ‌precedence. The ‍government has a⁢ duty ‍to act⁣ in the best interest ⁣of the public, and it is crucial that we push for these​ reforms, despite potential resistance from banks.Change is necessary, and with ⁣enough support from the public and other lawmakers, we can achieve⁢ it.

Editor: Before we conclude, what message would you like to⁢ convey to citizens regarding their role in advocating for these changes?

apostolaki: ‌ I encourage citizens⁢ to stay informed, voice their concerns, and demand transparency from their banks. Understanding your rights and the fees associated with your financial‍ transactions is⁤ crucial. Change begins with raising awareness, and together, we can ⁣advocate for a fairer banking system.

Editor: ‌ Milena,thank you ‌for your insights and dedication⁤ to improving our financial systems. It’s been a pleasure speaking with you today!

Apostolaki: Thank you⁣ for ‍having me! It’s critically important that we‍ all‍ engage in these discussions to‌ shape a​ better future for our economy.

Editor: And thank you to ‍our audience for‌ joining us. Stay tuned for more discussions that matter!

You may also like

Leave a Comment