Seoul, South Korea
CNN
South Korea’s ruling party has thrown its support behind attempts to impeach embattled President Yoon Suk Yeol over his ill-fated decision to declare martial law that sparked a political crisis and widespread public anger in the contry.
The proclamation came moments before Yoon delivered a defiant speech on Thursday in which he justified his hugely controversial martial law decision,rejecting growing calls from across the political spectrum for him to stand down.
“We tried to find a better way than impeachment, but that other way is invalid,” party leader Han Dong-hoon said. “Suspending the president from his duties through impeachment is the only way for now, to defend democracy and the republic.”
The main opposition Democratic Party is preparing a new impeachment motion against Yoon, with a vote expected as soon as Saturday.
Last weekend, Yoon survived an impeachment vote after members of the PPP left parliament and boycotted the vote.
The PPP’s reversal dramatically increases the pressure on Yoon and the likelihood that the next impeachment attempt will be successful.
“I believe our party members will vote for the country and the people,” he said.
The PPP’s announcement is the latest dramatic turn in what has become a stunning political showdown in South Korea over the past week.
The president’s shocking but short-lived declaration of martial law in a late-night address on December 3 quickly backfired and galvanized many in the vibrant democracy to call for his removal.
Dramatic scenes from that night showed security forces breaking through windows in the National Assembly to try and prevent lawmakers from gathering, and protesters confronting riot police.
Within just six hours, the leader was forced to back down, after lawmakers forced their way past soldiers into parliament to strike down the decree.
In the days since, Yoon has faced intense pressure to stand down, with protesters and opposition figures demanding his impeachment – and support wavering even within his own party and the military.
“I will fight until the last moment with the people,” Yoon said in Thursday’s speech.
“I apologize again to the people who might have been surprised and nervous due to the short-lived martial law. Please trust in my passionate loyalty for you,the people.”
What are the historical precedents for martial law in South Korea and their impact on democracy?
Interview: Political Implications of President Yoon Suk Yeol‘s Martial Law Decision
Editor, Time.news: Welcome, Dr. Lee, an expert in East Asian politics and governmental systems. Today, we delve into the recent political turmoil in South Korea following President Yoon Suk Yeol’s controversial martial law declaration. Can you share your thoughts on the implications of this event for South Korean democracy?
Dr. Lee: Thank you for having me. The declaration of martial law by President Yoon Suk Yeol was unprecedented in South Korean politics and reveals notable vulnerabilities within the current administration. The fact that his own party,the people Power Party (PPP),is now considering impeachment highlights a serious erosion of political support,which could destabilize governance in the short term.
Editor, Time.news: Indeed, the PPP has voiced support for impeachment, stating it’s necessary to “defend democracy and the republic.” How does this reflect on the political landscape in South Korea?
Dr. Lee: The support for impeachment from the PPP signifies a critical turning point.It illustrates that they are prioritizing party integrity and public sentiment over loyalty to the president. It could set a precedent for how political parties handle crises in the future, especially in a vibrant democracy like South Korea, where public outrage can shape political decisions rapidly.
Editor, Time.news: Could you explain the events leading up to this declaration and how they galvanized public opposition against Yoon?
Dr. Lee: Yoon’s martial law declaration during his late-night address on December 3 shocked the public. The swift backlash from citizens, who confronted security forces and made their way into the National Assembly, was demonstrative of South Korea’s active civil society. His power grab was short-lived, lasting mere hours, but it exposed deep divisions and dissatisfaction with his leadership style.The political crisis was exacerbated by the dramatic visuals of protests and lawmakers breaking through the military presence, which energized opposition movements.
Editor, Time.news: Following this incident, what practical advice would you give to South Korean citizens concerned about their democracy?
Dr. Lee: Citizens should remain vigilant and actively engage in the political process.This includes participating in protests, voting in upcoming elections, and demanding accountability from their leaders. Additionally,forming coalitions across ideological lines can amplify their voices. Staying informed through reliable news sources is also crucial in a time when misinformation can easily sway public opinion.
Editor, Time.news: The main opposition Democratic Party is preparing another impeachment motion.What do you predict will happen next in this political saga?
Dr. Lee: Given the PPP’s recent shift in stance, I anticipate that the likelihood of a triumphant impeachment is higher this time, especially if the Democratic Party mobilizes effectively. If Yoon cannot stabilize his support within the PPP and the military, his presidency may come to an abrupt end. The coming days will be critical as the public and political pressure mounts.
Editor, Time.news: In Yoon’s own words, he stated, “I will fight until the last moment with the people.” How do you interpret this declaration in light of his declining support?
Dr. Lee: Yoon’s statement can be seen as both defiance and desperation. It reflects his commitment to hold onto power despite overwhelming opposition. However, this rhetoric may further alienate him from the public, as they perceive a disconnect between his words and actions.Continuous resistance to calls for accountability, especially in the face of widespread discontent, could ultimately hasten calls for his resignation.
Editor, Time.news: Thank you, Dr. Lee, for sharing your insights into this critical moment in South Korean politics. Your expertise sheds light on the implications of these events for democracy and governance in the region.
Dr. Lee: It’s been a pleasure discussing these pivotal developments. The coming weeks will be decisive not just for Yoon’s presidency, but for the future trajectory of South Korean democracy.