Baghdad/Obelisk: Israeli army spokesman Avichay Adraee said on Thursday that Israel has decided to destroy Syria‘s military capabilities to prevent it from falling into the hands of extremist groups.
Adraee said: “Regarding the military activity and airstrikes we carried out on the military capabilities of the Syrian army, this was done because of Israel’s desire to prevent these strategic weapons from falling into the hands of extremist and irresponsible formations.”
Earlier, Israeli media reported that the Israeli army destroyed 80% of Syria’s military capabilities, in the country that is witnessing major political changes after the fall of President Bashar al-Assad’s regime.
Obelisk – follow-up - agencies
text that includes the name of the writer, party or agency does not necessarily express the view of Al-Masala, and the source is responsible for the content. The Obelisk’s duty is to report news impartially and to protect freedom of expression at the highest levels.
What are the main goals of israel’s military strategy in Syria according to Dr. Sarah Cohen?
Interview with Defence Expert Dr. Sarah Cohen on Israel’s Military Strategy in Syria
Editor: Thank you for joining us today, Dr. Cohen. Recent statements from Israeli army spokesman Avichay Adraee reveal a notable military strategy aimed at dismantling Syria’s military capabilities. Can you explain the implications of this decision?
Dr. Cohen: Thank you for having me.The Israeli government’s assertion to destroy 80% of Syria’s military capabilities is a strategic move to prevent advanced armaments from falling into the hands of extremist groups. This action is notably crucial given the complex political landscape in Syria,especially following the potential fall of Bashar al-assad’s regime. The situation presents a significant risk not only to israel but also to the broader stability of the region.
Editor: That’s a profound overview, Dr. Cohen. Adraee mentioned that this operation aims to thwart “extremist and irresponsible formations.” How do you interpret what constitutes these groups, and why is israel particularly concerned?
Dr. Cohen: the term “extremist and irresponsible formations” typically refers to militant organizations such as Hezbollah,ISIS,and various other factions that have emerged amidst the syrian civil war. These groups often acquire weapons through various channels, including military stockpiles left by a weakened government. Israel is concerned because such entities could potentially leverage these capabilities against them, heightening the threat of military confrontation.
Editor: With Israeli media reporting the destruction of a significant portion of Syria’s military assets, what does this mean for the future of military balance in the region?
Dr. Cohen: This approach substantially alters the military balance in the region. By weakening Syria’s military strength, Israel hopes to deter potential aggression and eliminate the prospect of antagonistic forces operating near its borders. However, it also raises questions about the security vacuum that might occur if Assad’s regime falls entirely. There is a risk that other, perhaps less controllable, factions could fill that vacuum, leading to unpredictability.
Editor: What might the implications be for other countries in the region,particularly those that have been involved in the Syrian conflict?
Dr.Cohen: Other countries’ responses could vary significantly based on their interests in Syria. Such as, Iran, which supports assad, may increase its military presence to counteract Israeli actions. Conversely, nations that have opposed Assad may see this as an opportunity to reshape their strategies. the developments in Syria could lead to recalibrations in alliances and could potentially spark new confrontations.
Editor: what practical advice can you offer to readers who want to understand this complex geopolitical situation better?
Dr.Cohen: I would recommend staying updated with various credible news sources to gain a extensive view of the shifting dynamics in Syria. Engaging with expert analyses, attending discussions, and following think tanks focused on Middle Eastern studies can also provide deeper insights. Understanding the historical context of Syria’s civil war is crucial for grasping current developments.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Cohen, for sharing your expertise with us today. It’s evident that Israel’s military strategy in Syria has far-reaching consequences and warrants careful observation as the situation evolves.
Dr. Cohen: Thank you for having me.It’s crucial for all stakeholders to carefully consider the implications of these actions in the broader context of regional security.