On the 13th, Yeo Yeo-hyung, commander of the ROK Armed Forces Counterintelligence Command (Army Lieutenant General), for whom an arrest warrant was requested for charges of insurrection and abuse of power in connection with the declaration of martial law on December 3, announced his intention to give up interrogation of suspects (substantive examination of warrants) before arrest.
Commander Yeo said in a statement that day,“I decided to give up answering questions about the need for my arrest during the arrest warrant substantive review process because I judged that it was not a duty to the people or my subordinates.” He added, “I take duty for my judgment, actions, and results seriously, and I will take full legal responsibility for them.”
Previously, the Prosecution’s Emergency Martial Law Special Investigation Headquarters (Director Park se-hyun, Chief of the seoul High Prosecutors’ Office) announced on this day that it had requested an arrest warrant for a female commander from the Central Regional Military Court on charges of engaging in critically important civil war duties and abuse of power. The female commander has been excluded from her duties, but is still a soldier. Since the prosecution does not have the authority to investigate active-duty soldiers, a military prosecutor dispatched to the special headquarters directly requested a warrant from the Central Military Court.
On the 3rd, the day of martial law, Commander Yeo, under the direction of than Minister of National Defense Kim Yong-hyun, delivered a list of arrestees, including about 15 key figures, including representatives of the ruling and opposition parties and the Speaker of the National Assembly, to National Police Agency Commissioner cho Ji-ho and former National Intelligence Service First Deputy Director Hong Jang-won, and provided their location information.He is accused of requesting tracking. He is also accused of sending counterintelligence agents to the National Assembly and the National Election Commission and ordering them to arrest key figures and secure the National Election Commission’s servers.
In her statement, Commander Yeo said, “On December 3, I received an order from the Minister (former Kim Yong-hyun) and was seriously concerned between my sense of duty to carry out the order and the various consequences that would result, but I followed the order as a soldier and a commander.” claimed. At the same time, he appealed, “I hope that my subordinates who trusted me and had to carry out orders, even if only passively, will be shown the utmost leniency and tolerance.”
trot >
interview
today’s horoscope
At Gwanghwamun
Kim So-young, Donga.com reporter [email protected]
-
- great
- 0dog
- I’m sad
- 0dog
-
- I’m angry
- 0dog
Hot news now
- I’m sad
- 0dog
- I’m angry
- 0dog
How does the relationship between military and civilian governance affect political stability in democratic countries?
Interviewer (Time.news Editor): Good afternoon, everyone. Today, we have a very special guest with us—[Expert’s Name], an esteemed military analyst, to discuss the recent developments surrounding Yeo Yeo-hyung, the former commander of the ROK Armed Forces Counterintelligence Command. Thank you for joining us today.
Expert: Thank you for having me. It’s a crucial time in South Korea, and I’m glad to share insights on these developments.
Interviewer: Let’s dive in. On December 3rd,Commander yeo reportedly declared martial law,which has now led to an arrest warrant due to allegations of insurrection and abuse of power.What are the implications of such actions in a democratic society?
expert: The declaration of martial law is a significant step that fundamentally affects civil rights and liberties. In a democratic habitat, it can lead to a loss of trust in the military and government institutions. When a military figure like Commander Yeo takes such measures, it can signal deep-seated problems within the command structure and military ethics.
Interviewer: Commander Yeo stated he feels he has a duty to the people and his subordinates. However, he decided to relinquish his right to an interrogation regarding his arrest. How should we interpret this decision?
Expert: This is a complex situation. Yeo’s resignation to face interrogation coudl be seen as an attempt to take responsibility for his actions, which might portray him as honorable in his eyes. On the other hand, it might also suggest he believes he has a strong legal defense or possibly that he intends to shield others from repercussions, as he appeals for leniency for his subordinates who were following orders.
Interviewer: It’s not uncommon in military settings to follow orders without question. Given that Yeo followed instructions from the Minister of national Defense, how does this relate to the accountability of military personnel?
Expert: Military personnel are trained to execute orders, but they must also understand the legality of those orders. In south Korea’s case, when orders conflict with civil rights or democratic principles, military members are supposed to question and address these issues. Yeo’s situation is a classic example of this dilemma: balancing duty and adherence to democratic norms. It raises critical questions about accountability and how far one can go in executing orders.
Interviewer: The prosecution has mentioned that the arrest request was in connection to a broader examination involving high-ranking officials from various parties. What does this suggest about political dynamics and military involvement in politics in South Korea?
Expert: The intertwining of military and political arenas in South Korea is fraught with historical tension. These recent events illustrate a moment where the military is not only involved in security matters but is also substantially impacting political stability.If high-ranking officials are implicated, it could lead to a power struggle within the government and perhaps destabilize civilian governance.
Interviewer: Yeo mentioned that he was “seriously concerned” about the consequences of his actions on the day of the martial law declaration. What does this tell us about leadership in times of crisis?
Expert: That statement reveals a critical aspect of leadership: the burden of decision-making in high-pressure scenarios. It reflects that Yeo understood the gravity of his actions but felt compelled to act. This type of moral quandary is a common occurrence in crisis situations, where leaders must weigh their responsibility to follow orders against the potential harm those orders may cause to the broader society.
Interviewer: As we wrap up, what do you believe are the long-term consequences of this situation for the South Korean military and government?
Expert: The long-term consequences could involve a reevaluation of military governance, an increase in civilian oversight of military actions, and potentially sweeping reforms in the defense sector. It places a spotlight on the relationship between military command and democratic governance, making it a pivotal moment for South Korea in terms of both national security and civil liberties.
Interviewer: Thank you very much for sharing your insights today, [Expert’s Name]. This situation will surely develop in the coming weeks, and we appreciate your analysis on these critical topics.
Expert: My pleasure, and I look forward to following this situation closely. It’s essential that we continue discussing the interplay between military power and democratic values.
Interviewer: And thank you to our audience for tuning in. We’ll keep you updated on this evolving story. Until next time!