Ncc, the Lazio TAR suspends the 20 minute break between one service and another

by time news

Listen to the audio version of the⁣ article

Compensation for ​the ⁤reform of the NCC. The rule that establishes the obligation to stop for 20 minutes between one service and another outside the garage is stuck in the Lazio Regional Administrative Court wich published a decree yesterday partially accepting the requests of black cars. The suspension ​comes on⁢ the day of the initial‍ protest of the NCC in 12 Italian ‍cities to which Salvini responded yesterday from the stage​ of the Hall of Rome: «If ‌in ‌one period the taxis come to protest and in one period the NCCs come that means that the -fair reform and it protects the citizen”, said the ‌owner of the Infrastructure.

The suspense

The administrative judges adjourned the discussion on ⁣the matter to the council chamber on January 13 ​but in the meantime they partially suspended the effects of the ⁤rule, ⁣objecting that «it appears that serious and irreparable damage will occur to⁣ the owners of the rental business with a⁢ driver as a result ⁤of the impositions ‍introduced regarding the implementation of⁢ methods”.And that is that “the ​reservation can be registered ‌as a draft service up to twenty ⁢minutes before the start of the relevant service” and that “the ‌departure simultaneously occurring⁢ as the arrival of the previous service to⁢ which it is indeed connected, which must be done. on the same date of the reference service, without prejudice to night services performed in ⁢the first 4 hours of the morning”.

The reactions

“It would be ‍a victory for ‌justice and consumers to have paid that mandatory siesta, since the NCCs‍ would have had a lower income for the same number of hours worked ‍and, therefore, there would⁤ have been an inevitable‍ end to give this salvini tax to customers”. This is ⁣the‌ response of Massimiliano Dona, president of the National Union of Consumers, and to Raffaella Paita, senator and national coordinator ​of Italia Viva, it is indeed “rejection of a goverment ‍vision that is entirely the defense of ⁢one​ category, such⁢ as taxis, against Ncc.and users”.

The objection

The Lazio TAR decree was at the same time as the protest of the black cars that had ​already been⁤ announcing the lockout for Thursday 12 December for weeks. Salvini’s decrees were at the heart of the‌ mobilization.Rome,Milan,Florence⁣ but also Cagliari and Palermo were present,yesterday along with eight other cities,the agitations in which Uber cars also entered. ⁣At the center of the protest is the minor amendment which is ⁢an obstacle to work and the opening of the⁣ market according to operators. For Andrea Romano, former vice-dem and president of MuoverSì, the “decree will ⁤have the ​effect of closing⁤ thousands of companies, making​ transport in our cities even more‌ hellish, hitting users, ⁤tourists and hotels – he said from the square ⁤Capranica in the Capital. – Our cities, our transport and our ‍citizens would need it all.” This was expressed by Francesco Artusa, president of ‘Sistema Trasporti’ who ⁤spoke directly to the tenant of Palazzo Chigi: “President Meloni, if all these companies are here, if the whole world of ‌NCCs is involved in this strike, from Uber in ‍Limolane and Transfeero. they⁤ gave up their technology,if this initiative had consumer support and Fiavet,the main‌ tourism institution in Confcommercio is not sure,it is clear that the government is putting into business.” Uber’s involvement in the unrest has also sparked “regret” in ministerial circles. “Regarding the‌ specific reasons for the Uber strike,‍ it is indeed reiterated that the fight against illegal practices and irregularities in the operation of unscheduled public⁢ transport services – which are among the priority ⁢objectives of the MIT decrees – should be a common goal.” , MIT sources confirmed.Salvini also defended the line of decrees during question time in the ‍Chamber.‍ “For six years – the minister answered on Thursday -‍ we have been waiting for the⁢ implementation decrees, which aim to make the service effective by fighting illegal activity. Uber goes⁣ on‍ strike. I’m sorry, but we ⁤don’t always have to conform to the ⁣expectations of some foreign ‍multinationals in Italy.”

Ncc, the Lazio TAR suspends the 20 minute break between one service and another

What are the recent developments in the NCC ⁤controversy in ‌Italy?

time.news Interview: Navigating the NCC Controversy

Time.news ⁢editor: Welcome, everyone, to another edition of our expert ​interview series. Today, we have ​the privilege of speaking with ⁤Dr. Maria Rossi, a ⁤leading expert in transportation regulation and urban mobility. We’ll be discussing ​the recent developments surrounding the NCC—Noleggio ⁢con Conducente—or driver-rental services in Italy.Thank you for joining⁤ us, Dr. Rossi.

Dr. Maria⁢ Rossi: Thank ‍you for having me.​ I’m ​excited to shed ⁣light on this notable issue affecting many operators and consumers throughout ‍Italy.

Editor: Let’s jump right in. A recent ruling from the Lazio Regional Administrative Court has created ⁤quite a buzz in the NCC ⁢community. Can‌ you give ‌us a ‌brief overview of‌ what happened?

Rossi: Certainly.The court issued a decree that partially ​upheld the requests⁤ from NCC operators. They suspended a regulation requiring drivers to take a 20-minute break between services outside ⁤the garage. This is a‌ significant progress because it suggests ​that ⁣the court recognizes the potential negative impact of such a rule on NCC operators.

Editor: that’s intriguing! Given ‌that this ruling coincided with protests in 12 cities,what does this say about the current⁤ state of the NCC and taxi services in Italy?

Rossi: it reflects a broader tension in the transport sector. The simultaneous protests from ‍both taxi drivers ⁣and NCC operators indicate that ther is ⁣widespread dissatisfaction with the current regulatory surroundings. When both sides are feeling threatened enough to mobilize, ‌it shows that the reforms in place may not be serving the interests of either⁣ group sufficiently.

Editor: Italian Minister Matteo Salvini has ‌pointed to these protests as⁣ evidence that reform is needed. How ‍does this ​fit ⁣into the larger narrative of transport regulation?

Rossi: Minister Salvini’s comments underscore a⁢ common political framing: when multiple sectors protest, it implies a failure ​of existing regulations to ⁤meet market⁣ needs. It also indicates that ​there may need to be a more balanced approach ‌to regulation that considers the needs of both taxis and NCCs to ensure fair ‌competition and⁤ consumer protection.

Editor: The court’s decision is scheduled for further discussion in January.​ What implications ‌does this have for NCC operators⁤ in the⁢ short‍ term?

Rossi: The⁤ suspension of ⁤the 20-minute‌ rule offers some immediate relief to NCC ⁢operators who are concerned about the⁣ financial impacts of such a mandate. However, the fact that ‍the court⁢ has adjourned the matter means that these operators will remain ⁣in a state of uncertainty for some time. Businesses⁤ thrive on predictability, ⁢and the ongoing litigation creates challenges for planning and operations.

Editor: It truly⁣ seems that clarity ⁢and stability are crucial. In your opinion, what steps​ should ⁣regulators take moving forward to address the concerns ​of both‍ NCC operators and ⁣taxi drivers?

Rossi: Regulators should⁢ foster open ⁣dialogue between all stakeholders in‍ the transport sector.Creating committees that include representatives from both taxis⁣ and NCCs can lead to solutions that acknowledge the realities of urban mobility today. Additionally, implementing pilot programs to test new regulations ⁣before full-scale rollouts may also allow for⁣ adjustments ⁣based on⁣ real-world impacts.

Editor: Those sound like constructive approaches. Before we wrap up, is there anything‍ else you’d like to​ share⁢ about this ongoing situation?

Rossi: I think it’s important​ for the public to understand ⁢that ‍regulations aren’t just bureaucratic hurdles; they substantially impact people’s livelihoods. As challenges in urban‌ transportation multiply, we must advocate for adaptive regulations that support innovation while ensuring safety and fairness.

Editor: ⁢Thank you so much for​ your insights, Dr. Rossi.⁢ The conversation around transportation‍ in Italy is certainly evolving, and we appreciate your expertise in navigating this complex topic.

Rossi: ⁣Thank you for having me! I ⁢look​ forward to seeing how this⁣ situation unfolds in the coming months.

Editor: and thank you to our audience for joining us today. stay tuned‌ for more discussions on ⁣the issues that matter most to you.

You may also like

Leave a Comment