“Korea is a servile traitor” “Yeon shattered the party’s reputation” Conflict between Chin Yoon and Chin Han increases

by times news cr

⁣ ⁤ ⁤ ⁢
​ ⁣ ‍
⁢ ⁣
⁢ ​ ⁢ “CEO Han Dong-hoon’s convening of the ethics committee is a ‍late-night ⁢coup. “It is a dictatorial ⁣idea that regards the⁢ party as‍ personal property.”‌ (People Power Party Rep. Yoon Sang-hyeon)
“If great harm has been ⁤caused to ‍the party, it is indeed grounds for ⁢disciplinary action.“The current⁣ social​ evaluation of the party has seriously deteriorated compared to before martial law.” (People Power ‌Party Vice ⁤President for Strategic Planning Shin Ji-ho)

The conflict between⁤ the People Power‌ Party’s pro-Yoon⁣ (pro-yoon⁤ Seok-yeol)-senior group and ⁣the pro-Chin (pro-Han Dong-hoon) faction is growing⁢ over the expulsion and expulsion of President Yoon Seok-yeol. Pro-Yoon leaders targeted a representative‌ who was pushing for‌ President Yoon’s expulsion ⁢and⁣ expulsion from the party, harshly criticizing‍ him as a “servant traitor” and also defending the contents of President Yoon’s statement ⁤the‌ previous day. Conversely, the close⁢ circle called for his expulsion, saying, “President Yoon directly destroyed ⁢the constitutional order and liberal democracy, ⁢which ⁤are conservative values.”

People Power⁣ Party lawmaker Kwon Young-se is answering questions from reporters while attending a closed⁣ meeting of senior lawmakers held at ⁢the National Assembly in Yeouido, Seoul on⁣ the afternoon of the 13th. 2024.12.13. Newsis

Rep. Kwon Young-se, a ⁣prominent pro-Yoon figure, met with reporters ⁤on the 13th and said, “I am opposed⁤ to President Yoon’s expulsion and expulsion from the⁢ party.” “Even if we move away like​ this,we can’t escape,” he said. Rep. Kwon issued a statement ⁣and ⁢criticized Representative Han, saying,⁢ “It is a cowardly politics of the⁣ ‘admiration goto’ ​style of swallowing what is sweet and spitting‌ out when it is bitter.” Kim Jae-won, ​a member of the pro-Yoon faction, also said, “(Representative Han) ⁤never ‍even contacted the Supreme Committee about convening the ethics committee when announcing that he would expel the president.”​ Pro-Yoon and senior figures defended President ⁤Yoon’s statement the previous day. ⁣made a statement. People Power party Policy Committee Chairman Kim⁤ Sang-hoon argued, “It was a statement that appealed to the desperation‌ that led to the declaration‍ of martial ⁤law.” five-term lawmaker Kim Ki-hyun also ​said, “The declaration of martial law⁤ itself cannot⁢ be ​justified,” but added, “There are‍ some parts of the justification for declaring martial law that I can sympathize with.” rep. na Kyung-won also​ said, “Let’s calmly consider the meaning.”

The pleasant circle ⁢dismissed⁣ this backlash. A close-knit leader said, ⁤“President ‍Yoon has fully⁣ destroyed the party’s reputation,” and

Following Representative Han’s emergency convening order, the People Power ⁣Party’s Central Ethics Committee held a meeting the night before, ​chaired by Ethics Committee Chairman ​Shin Shin-jin, ‌and deliberated on the initiation‌ of disciplinary proceedings against President Yoon. After ‌the meeting, the​ Ethics Committee said, “Considering the gravity⁢ of the matter, we decided ⁢to ‌proceed cautiously regarding substance and procedures.”

As factional conflict within the party intensifies,there are ⁣also observations that a ‘psychological division’ situation ⁢may⁤ be in full swing ​following the passage of the ‍impeachment⁤ bill. The pro-Yoon group is raising the ‘Han Dong-hoon responsibility theory’, ⁤saying, “If President ⁤Yoon is impeached, it will be the ⁣responsibility ‍of‍ the representative and leadership who failed to prevent the‍ betrayal vote.” Chin ⁣Yoon’s calculation is that if just one of​ his close relatives, Supreme Council⁤ member Jang Dong-hyuk and Supreme Youth Council⁣ member Jin ⁢Jong-oh, resigns, the one ​representative system will collapse ‍and be converted into⁤ an emergency response committee. In response, a key ⁢pro-friendly official countered, “I understand that both Jang Dong-hyuk ⁣and⁢ Supreme ‌Council member Jin Jong-oh decided not to resign after seeing the president’s statement.”

  • Hot news now

    How could the ​internal conflict in⁤ the People Power Party impact future elections ⁢in South⁢ Korea?

    Time.news Interview: the‍ Growing Factional Conflict within the ⁤People Power⁤ Party

    Editor (Time.news): Today, we have the pleasure of speaking with political ‌analyst Dr.Min-Soo Lee, who specializes‍ in South Korean political dynamics. Dr. Lee, welcome!

    Dr. Min-soo Lee: Thank‍ you ​for having me. ⁤It’s my pleasure to be here.

    Editor: Let’s dive right into ⁤it.The‌ recent fallout ‍within ⁤the People Power ⁣Party seems intense. Can you ‍give us a brief overview of⁣ what triggered this conflict?

    Dr. Lee: ‍Absolutely.⁢ The current⁢ turmoil stemmed from CEO Han Dong-hoon convening an ethics commitee meeting, which some members view as‍ a power grab. representative Yoon Sang-hyeon described ⁤it as a “late-night coup” ‍and⁤ criticized han’s approach as dictatorial. this division is especially noticeable between the‍ pro-Yoon ‌faction, which ⁤supports President Yoon seok-yeol, ⁤and the pro-Han faction, which feels that Yoon’s actions have endangered the party’s integrity.

    Editor: ⁢ That’s quite the divide. What are the stakes for each faction?

    Dr. Lee: For the⁤ pro-Yoon faction, the stakes are enormously high. They believe that defending President Yoon is crucial to maintaining their‌ influence and credibility. The backlash ⁤has already led to⁢ public condemnations of ‌Representative Han, who is‍ pushing for disciplinary actions against Yoon for his controversial statements that some⁢ see as undermining constitutional order.

    On the⁤ flip⁣ side,the pro-Han faction sees Yoon’s presidency ‍as damaging⁤ to the party’s reputation and fears that his leadership could lead ​to⁣ electoral consequences. They believe that taking ⁤a ​stand against ​Yoon, ⁣even at the cost of expelling him, is necessary for the party’s future.

    Editor: ‍ It seems like‍ a ⁣precarious balancing act. ⁤How do you see this affecting the party’s overall effectiveness and⁤ unity ⁤moving forward?

    Dr. Lee: It’s likely to ⁤create significant challenges. As the conflicts deepen, ⁤we could see a psychological divide ‍that not ‌only affects internal ⁢unity but potentially alienates ‍voters. If the party ‍becomes embroiled in factional disputes, it risks ⁢being perceived as ineffective and ⁤unable to govern. ⁢The ethics committee’s cautious approach suggests that they are aware of these ramifications but must still navigate ⁢the ​political minefield created by loyalty, ideology,​ and personal ambition.

    Editor: Do you think there’s a realistic chance for reconciliation,​ or is this likely to lead ‌to more ‌severe repercussions, like ‍further expulsions?

    Dr. Lee: Reconciliation is ⁤always a possibility in politics, especially​ when the threat of external competition exists. ‌However,given the strong sentiments expressed so far,especially from figures like Kwon Young-se who are staunchly against expulsion,it seems doubtful that things will settle down easily. ‍If this division continues unchecked, it could lead to significant fracturing or even realignment of party loyalty,⁤ pointing to a larger ideological rift.

    Editor: As we ⁣look at ‌the broader picture, how might this internal​ conflict influence ‌the political landscape in ⁣South Korea as a whole?

    dr. Lee: This conflict could have profound implications.If the People Power Party⁣ fails⁤ to ⁤resolve its internal issues, it may‍ provide an opening for rival parties to capitalize on their⁣ disarray. Voter trust is⁤ fragile,and if constituents feel that their​ representatives are⁣ more focused on‍ infighting ⁢than governance,it⁤ could translate to lost support in ‌upcoming ⁤elections. A fragmented party landscape ​can shift power dynamics considerably, potentially reshaping voter allegiances.

    Editor: That ⁤poses a lot to think about. Lastly, ​what do‍ you think is the critical ​takeaway from this situation for both politicians and voters alike?

    Dr. Lee: The‍ essential takeaway is the ‌importance of unity and clarity of purpose within political parties. For politicians, it’s a ​reminder that personal ambitions ⁤should ⁤not ​overshadow collective goals.⁣ As for⁣ voters, this‌ situation reinforces⁢ the need to scrutinize their representatives, as internal ⁤conflicts‍ can directly affect the effectiveness of governance⁣ and the depiction of their interests.

    Editor: Thank you, Dr. Lee, for your insights. It’s⁣ clear‌ that we’re witnessing ⁣a⁣ pivotal moment in South​ Korean politics, and we appreciate ​you shedding some light on the situation.

    Dr. Lee: ‍Thank you for having me. It’s been a pleasure discussing ‌these critical issues⁣ with you.

    You may also like

    Leave a Comment