Donald Trump‘s transition team is reportedly planning to withdraw the United states from the World Health Association (WHO) on his inauguration day, January 20, 2025, according to The financial times. This move could considerably impact global health initiatives, as the U.S. contributes 16% of the WHO’s funding,raising concerns among experts about the potential void in leadership and resources.Lawrence Gostin, a global health expert at Georgetown University, warned that such a withdrawal would leave a ample gap in global health financing, likely increasing China’s influence in the organization. This decision echoes Trump’s previous attempt to exit the WHO during his first term, which was halted by President Biden.
interview: The Implications of Potential U.S. Withdrawal from WHO with Lawrence Gostin
Editor: Thank you for joining us today,Lawrence. Recent reports suggest that Donald Trump’s transition team plans to withdraw the United States from the World Health Organization (WHO) on January 20, 2025. What are your initial thoughts on this development?
Lawrence Gostin: Thank you for having me. This decision, if it materializes, could have profound repercussions for global health. The U.S. contributes approximately 16% of the WHO’s funding, which substantially supports its programs worldwide. With the U.S. stepping away, ther’s a genuine concern about creating a leadership void in global health initiatives.
Editor: That’s a crucial point. Can you elaborate on how this withdrawal could specifically affect global health initiatives?
Lawrence Gostin: Certainly. the WHO plays a pivotal role in coordinating global health responses, particularly during health crises like pandemics. without the U.S., resources for combating diseases, vaccine distribution, and health infrastructure in low-income countries could be severely undermined. This retreat could also embolden other nations, particularly China, to increase their influence within the organization, possibly reshaping global health priorities to align more closely with their interests.
editor: This seems to echo Trump’s previous attempt to disengage from the WHO during his first term. Do you see any similarities in the political climate or reasoning behind this potential move?
Lawrence Gostin: Absolutely. the previous withdrawal attempt was framed around criticisms of WHO’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic and claims of mismanagement. There’s a tendency among some leaders to prioritize national interests over global collaboration. However, health issues are inherently transnational; they require cooperative strategies. Deviating from this could led to weaker responses to future health threats.
Editor: Given these points, what practical advice would you give to health policymakers in the U.S. and globally if this withdrawal occurs?
Lawrence Gostin: Policymakers shoudl prioritize strengthening bilateral and multilateral partnerships to uphold global health standards, even in the absence of U.S. leadership within the WHO. Enhancing funding for global health initiatives through choice channels and encouraging international cooperation is vital. Moreover, public health advocates must engage in discussions to ensure that even as political winds shift, our commitment to global health equity remains steadfast.
Editor: It’s evident that the implications are vast. How can global citizens respond to these developments?
Lawrence Gostin: Citizens can stay informed and advocate for sustained U.S.participation in global health organizations. Engagement in public discussions, supporting international health initiatives, and holding elected representatives accountable for their health policies can contribute to a stronger global health response system. Public awareness can also pressure decision-makers to recognize the importance of global health cooperation.
Editor: Thank you,Lawrence. This is a critical topic that warrants close attention as we approach the inauguration day. It’s clear that the future of global health hangs in a delicate balance, and your insights are invaluable in understanding the broader implications of these potential changes.
Lawrence Gostin: Thank you for the opportunity to discuss this vital issue. My hope is that regardless of political changes, the global community will recognize the importance of collective health initiatives and continue to work towards a more resilient future for all.