HONG KONG, June 16, 2025
Hong Kong’s Freedom Under Fire
A wave of actions in hong Kong signals a deepening crackdown on dissent, raising concerns about the city’s future.
- Authorities in Hong Kong have increased scrutiny of individuals and organizations.
- The U.S. response to these actions has been limited, drawing criticism.
- Geopolitical tensions might potentially be facilitating the crackdown.
On June 12, 2025, Hong Kong authorities, along with china’s national security officials, raided homes and an office, escalating concerns about the city’s diminishing freedoms. This latest move, coupled with warnings against downloading a “seditious” mobile video game, demonstrates the city’s evolving regulatory approaches.
Since the controversial national security law was passed in 2020, Hong Kong has undergone a change, with manny describing it as a “police state.”
A Shifting Landscape
The law, which punishes actions critical of hong Kong and China, has been a point of contention. While the U.S. initially imposed sanctions, the response seems to have waned in recent times.
Did you know?-The national security law criminalizes secession, subversion, terrorism, and collusion with foreign forces, with penalties ranging up to life imprisonment.
In March, Secretary of State Marco Rubio stated that “Beijing has broken its promises to the people of Hong Kong.” The State Department also sanctioned six individuals related to the erosion of freedom.
Though, critics argue that the U.S. has not taken further actions in response to recent developments in June.
Geopolitical Tensions and the Crackdown
the global landscape might potentially be unintentionally aiding the crackdown. Eric Yan-ho Lai, a research fellow at the Georgetown Center for Asian Law, notes that the rising geopolitical tensions between the U.S. and China have allowed Hong Kong’s government to expand its national security governance.
Reader question:-How might the international community more effectively balance its economic interests with the protection of human rights and democratic values in Hong Kong?
Lai also highlighted the shift to “executive-led” regulatory approaches to quell dissent, moving away from mass arrests.
Did you know? The national security law was passed in response to widespread anti-establishment protests in 2019.
U.S.Policy and the Bigger Picture
Under Trump’s second-term Administration, U.S. policy has primarily focused on China, frequently enough lumping Hong Kong in with the mainland. This includes scrutiny of visas and tariffs.
Experts previously noted that the second-term Administration might avoid measures aimed at non-economic areas to maintain a relationship with Chinese President Xi Jinping.
Ja Ian chong, an associate professor at the National University of Singapore, believes the Administration is primarily focused on its own domestic issues, despite awareness of the situation in Hong Kong.
A Moment of Opportunity?
beijing may benefit from what observers see as increasingly authoritarian-resembling moves by the Trump Administration, which may cast the U.S. as hypocritical, according to Chinese media.
Alex Colville and David Bandurski of the China media Project suggest that “Trump’s assault on democratic norms is an unexpected gift for China’s leaders.”
The Economic Stakes
Beyond the human rights concerns, Hong Kong’s economic role is also at stake. It has historically been a vital financial hub, ranking among the world’s top global financial centers [[2]]. The city is also a major exporter and importer, playing a significant role in global trade
Table of Contents
