Sacramento, Calif. – July 22, 2025 – California’s ambitious clean transportation initiatives are falling short for many residents who need them most, despite billions invested and a reputation as a climate leader. The state’s current strategy largely overlooks the crucial role of light electric vehicles (LEVs) like e-bikes.
A new electric car, even with a rebate, often exceeds $50,000, leaving many low-income workers and families struggling with outdated, costly, or unsafe transportation options. Public transit, while vital, often lacks the frequency and reach to be a practical alternative for those in areas like Stockton or San Bernardino.
This oversight leaves a significant portion of the population behind.
Rethinking “Clean Mobility”
The definition of clean mobility needs to expand to include equitable access for everyone. While zero-emission cars are a key component, they aren’t a viable solution for many Californians. Shift workers, students, and families without reliable public transit often require more accessible and affordable options.
Light electric vehicles, such as e-bikes and e-scooters, offer a promising alternative. They are cheaper to own and operate than traditional motor vehicles, require less space, and are well-suited for urban environments. For those excluded from the electric car market, LEVs can be a lifeline.
Expanding Incentive Programs
California is taking steps with programs like the Driving Clean Assistance Program, which offers grants and loans for low-income residents purchasing zero-emission vehicles, including LEVs. The E-Bike Incentive Project provides up to $2,000 for income-qualified Californians to purchase e-bikes, with priority given to those in low-income and disadvantaged communities. Residents enter a statewide lottery for vouchers usable at participating bike shops.
The demand is clear: the initial e-bike vouchers were claimed within minutes. However, funding needs a substantial boost, and incentives must be distributed efficiently to reach those most in need.
The Case for Used E-Bikes and Infrastructure
A key step is expanding the E-Bike Incentive Project to include certified, secondhand e-bikes. These can be 30% to 50% cheaper, allowing more people to use vouchers without out-of-pocket expenses. Rigorous inspections and certifications, such as UL or IN, can ensure safety and reliability.
Across the U.S., LEV rebates have proven effective. Denver’s program, for instance, offered income-qualified riders up to $1,200 for e-bike purchases, compared to $400 for all residents. Surveys indicate these lower-income owners rode nearly 50% more, covering an average of 26 miles weekly and avoiding multiple car trips.
Beyond rebates, treating light electric transportation as public infrastructure is essential. This means investing in a statewide network of safe, physically separated routes connecting neighborhoods to schools, jobs, and transit hubs. Major cities like Los Angeles and San Francisco have bicycle master plans that need urgent, prioritized implementation, especially as Los Angeles prepares for a car-free 2028 Olympics.
California possesses the means to achieve equitable green mobility. A shift in mindset is crucial: move beyond programs designed for those with existing access and build for those without, prioritizing sustainable micromobility as essential public infrastructure rather than mere lifestyle accessories.
