The basketball world is lighting up with a fierce debate ignited by a single, provocative question: “Start one, Bench one, Cut one,” featuring legends Tony Parker, Rajon Rondo, and Gilbert Arenas at their absolute peaks. A simple graphic featuring the three players has spurred thousands of passionate responses, dividing fans on how to rank these iconic point guards.
The post has gone viral, sparking intense online arguments about who deserves to start, who should be on the bench, and who should be cut from a hypothetical all-time lineup.
- Fans are fiercely debating whether to start, bench, or cut Tony Parker, Rajon Rondo, or Gilbert Arenas.
- Arguments favor Parker for his four NBA titles with the Spurs and scoring ability.
- Rondo is praised for his elite playmaking and defense.
- Arenas is championed as a primary scoring option, with some defending his performance due to a lack of Hall of Fame teammates.
- The debate highlights varying fan perspectives based on stats, achievements, and personal bias.
The debate has quickly become a battleground of opinions. Many staunchly advocate for Tony Parker to start, citing his four NBA championships with the San Antonio Spurs and superior scoring prowess. Others lean towards Rajon Rondo, highlighting his exceptional playmaking and defensive skills. A vocal contingent, however, champions Gilbert Arenas as the go-to scorer.
Disagreements run deep, with one user stating, “Start Gilbert; bench Parker; and cut Rondo.” This sparked an immediate rebuttal: “Rondo starting and Gil playing the 2. Cutting TP and I’m a Spurs fan, sorry.” The discourse even devolved into personal attacks, with one fan dismissing Rondo as “a glorified McDonald’s worker who runs the podcast,” a comment met with strong defenses of the two-time champion.
Did you know? Gilbert Arenas’ supporters argue he was unfairly judged because he never played alongside Hall of Fame teammates, suggesting he would have conformed to an elite second-option role if paired with someone like Tim Duncan.
Some defend Arenas, suggesting he was unfairly criticized due to the absence of Hall of Fame teammates. “You think if he played with Tim Duncan he’s not gonna conform to being the elite second option?” one fan posited. Conversely, others dismiss Arenas entirely, labeling him “a defensive liability” and declaring Parker the “clear choice.”
Another perspective suggests Rondo, while respected, might be better suited to the bench, not due to his abilities, but because he could excel as an NBA coach. Yet, many stick to the original sentiment: Parker starts, Rondo is benched, and Arenas is cut.
This heated discussion touches on fundamental basketball philosophies. “People rank players way too high simply because they are champions,” one commenter observed. The counterargument: “Defense exists…Gilbert is a defensive liability.” Such exchanges perfectly capture how fans weigh stats, accolades, and personal biases.
Ultimately, the debate remains a matter of fan preference, hinging on individual priorities like scoring, playmaking, defense, or championship pedigree. Regardless of the chosen lineup, the ongoing passionate discussions prove that even years after their primes, Tony Parker, Rajon Rondo, and Gilbert Arenas continue to hold a significant place in the hearts and minds of basketball enthusiasts.
