“`html
Columbus, Ohio – Rivian is suing the State of Ohio, alleging its ban on direct-to-consumer car sales is unfair, especially when compared to Tesla‘s previously established retail presence in the state. The electric vehicle maker claims Ohio’s 2014 law, which prohibits manufacturers from selling cars directly to customers without a dealer’s license, unfairly hinders its business. Rivian argues this ban creates undue hardship for both the company and Ohio consumers who wish to purchase their vehicles.
Ohio’s Direct Sales Ban Faces Legal Challenge
Rivian claims a 2014 law creating a carve-out for Tesla’s direct sales model is discriminatory.
- Rivian has filed a lawsuit against Ohio over its ban on direct-to-consumer vehicle sales.
- The company argues the law unfairly favors Tesla, which was permitted to operate direct sales locations in the state.
- Ohio consumers must currently complete purchases outside the state, leading to logistical issues.
- Rivian seeks to become a registered dealer in Ohio to facilitate direct sales.
While columbus might not rival New York or Los Angeles in wealth, it boasts a important number of high earners who appreciate luxury SUVs. despite the presence of brands like Tesla and Polestar, Ohioans looking for a Rivian or Lucid vehicle face a hurdle: the state’s prohibition on direct sales.This ban, enacted in 2014, prevents manufacturers from obtaining
