Matt Riddle & Goldberg: Backstage Clash Revealed

Matt Riddle Escalates Feud with Goldberg, Questions Wrestling Legacy

A long-simmering rivalry between Matt Riddle and wrestling icon Goldberg has reignited, with Riddle publicly criticizing GoldbergS in-ring performance and career trajectory in a recent interview with TMZ Sports, as reported by WrestlingInc. The comments stem from a previously undisclosed backstage encounter, allegedly captured on video, where Goldberg questioned Riddle’s understanding of the professional wrestling industry.

Riddle detailed the exchange, stating Goldberg found him “very disrespectful and rude” and accused him of lacking comprehension of the business. Riddle responded with a blunt assessment of Goldberg’s wrestling ability. “I see your point… I just don’t think you’re that great of a pro wrestler,” Riddle recounted saying. Goldberg’s retort, according to Riddle, centered on his financial success: “Oh, well my bank account’s huge.” Riddle countered, acknowledging Goldberg’s wealth but questioning the lasting impact of his matches. “Bill, your bank account, and I mean this, will probably always be bigger than mine, but at the end of the day, nobody is going to go back to watch that Bill goldberg 30-minute classic match.”

Did you know? – Goldberg initially gained fame in WCW in 1997 with an undefeated streak, quickly becoming a major star. his powerful style and limited move set were key to his early success.

The core of Riddle’s critique appears to be a contrast in career paths. He emphasized his own journey, highlighting his dedication to honing his craft. “Even when I was in the UFC, after I got fired, I went to a wrestling school. Started from square one and worked my way through the indies to WWE. He didn’t,” Riddle stated, implicitly suggesting Goldberg did not undergo the same rigorous growth process.

Pro tip: – “Working the indies” refers to performing for autonomous professional wrestling promotions, ofen smaller venues, to gain experience and build a following.

Despite the harsh words, Riddle did acknowledge one standout performance in Goldberg’s career.He identified Goldberg’s 1998 Halloween Havoc bout against Diamond Dallas Page as the wrestler’s “best match.” this concession, however, does little to soften the overall tone of Riddle’s assessment, which paints a picture of a performer whose success was disproportionate to his in-ring skill.

The ongoing dispute underscores a broader debate within professional wrestling regarding the value of established star power versus demonstrable wrestling ability,and the enduring legacy of performers in a rapidly evolving industry.

Reader question: – Do you think a wrestler’s financial success should be weighed against their in-ring skill when evaluating their legacy? What makes a wrestling match truly memorable?

As of now, Goldberg has not publicly responded to Riddle’s latest comments. The feud began several years ago with Riddle repeatedly calling out Goldberg for what he perceived as a lack of wrestling ability. While Goldberg has acknowledged Riddle’s challenges, he has largely dismissed them. The exchange detailed by Riddle provides a deeper look into the personal animosity between the two. the situation remains unresolved, with no immediate plans for a match between the two. The conflict highlights a growing tension within the wrestling world between veterans who achieved success through spectacle and newer performers prioritizing technical skill and long-term storytelling.