Federal Agents face Scrutiny Over Use of Force Against Protesters
A growing chorus of concern is rising over the tactics employed by federal agents during recent immigration protests, wiht accusations of excessive force and violations of departmental policies. Videos circulating online depict agents utilizing chokeholds, deploying pepper spray at close range, and employing vehicle maneuvers against demonstrators, sparking a national debate over accountability and the limits of law enforcement power.
A review of hundreds of videos, primarily captured by protesters on their cellphones, suggests repeated instances where the use of force doesn’t align with Department of Homeland Security (DHS) policies, which authorize force “only when no reasonably effective, safe, and feasible alternative appears to exist.”
“this isn’t policing and law enforcement as I practiced it for 25 years,” stated Eric Balliet,a veteran federal agent who conducted internal investigations into use of force misconduct for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) until last year.
The controversy centers on the actions of Customs and Border protection (CBP) agents, particularly in cities like Chicago, Portland, and Los Angeles. Gregory Bovino, the CBP commander leading the response to protests in Chicago, defends his agents’ actions, stating, “If someone strays into a pepper ball, then that’s on them. Don’t protest and don’t trespass.”
However, protesters and media organizations have filed a federal lawsuit challenging the tactics used under Bovino’s command. Last week, U.S. District Court Judge Sara L. Ellis issued a temporary restraining order blocking federal agents from deploying chemical spray or othre less-lethal weapons “unless such force is necessary to stop the immediate threat of physical harm to another.” The Trump governance has appealed the ruling, and DHS is now working to implement revised use-of-force directives by Tuesday.
“I see little reason for the use of force that the federal agents are currently using,” Judge Ellis declared from the bench. “The use of force shocks the conscience.”
Despite the court order and mounting criticism,President Trump has expressed support for the agents’ actions,claiming in a recent interview with CBS News’ “60 Minutes” that the tactics employed by ICE “haven’t gone far enough.”
Balliet attributes the concerning trend to a lack of leadership and oversight. “I don’t know where the leadership is here,” he said. “It truly seems to be non-existent. Any oversight and justification for the use of force seems to be absent across the board.”
Questionable tactics Under Review
Balliet,at the request of CBS News,reviewed numerous videos and identified several areas of concern.These include:
Firing less-Lethal Munitions at Protesters’ Heads and Torsos: Videos from outside ICE facilities show agents positioned above protesters, firing less-lethal munitions towards their heads and torsos. Agency policy explicitly prohibits targeting the head, neck, groin, or female breast.
One particularly disturbing incident, captured on cellphone video in Broadview, Illinois in September, shows an agent
Worth a look
- Force-Placed Insurance, Explained: The Coverage You Never Chose (daybreakwire.com)
