Trump & “Criminals”: Calls for Regime Change?

by Ethan Brooks

Iran Crisis – January 17,2026: Key Developments

Escalating Tensions: A tense standoff is unfolding between Iran and the United states amidst ongoing unrest within Iran. This follows the first day of relative calm in weeks regarding large-scale demonstrations against the Iranian regime.

Khamenei’s Hardline Stance: Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei delivered a speech accusing the US of instigating the recent revolt with the intention of “devouring Iran.” He dismissed calls for a halt to executions as “nonsense” and vowed to “break the backs of the seditious.” He labeled President trump a “criminal” and reiterated the US goal as “military, political and economic domination of iran.”

Did you know? – Iran’s Supreme Leader holds ultimate authority, overriding the elected president and parliament. This centralized power structure is a key factor in the current unrest and the regime’s response.

US Response & Threats: The White House, responding in both English and Farsi via social media, warned “All options are on the table, don’t mess with President Trump.” President Trump specifically linked a potential halt to executions to his threats of military intervention.He has also stated it’s “time to look for new leadership for iran,” calling Khamenei “a sick man” who should “stop killing people.” The US State department alleges intelligence indicates Iran is preparing to target american bases, reinforcing the “all options” threat.

Iranian Defiance: Tehran prosecutor Ali Salehi dismissed the potential revocation of death sentences as “useless and unfounded nonsense,” and urged Trump to “mind his own business.” Another Ayatollah, Ahmed Khatami, called for the execution of protesters, branding them “soldiers of Israel and the USA.”

Pro tip – Analyzing official statements in both English and Farsi can reveal nuances in messaging and intended audiences. the White House’s dual-language approach signals direct communication with the Iranian people.

Military Intervention Uncertainty: Despite the strong rhetoric, President Trump’s advisors are reportedly hesitant about a large-scale military attack, questioning its effectiveness in regime change and fearing wider regional escalation.

Internal Crackdown: Iranian security forces are actively suppressing dissent through raids on homes and businesses, confiscating surveillance footage, examining cell phone contents, and conducting vehicle searches.

Note: The article also briefly mentions a separate issue regarding Greenland and potential tariffs imposed by Trump on European countries.This is not central to the Iran crisis.

Why did this crisis begin? The crisis stems from widespread protests within Iran against the ruling regime, fueled by economic hardship and political repression. The protests,initially sparked by [insert specific initial trigger if known,otherwise state “unspecified grievances”],escalated into calls for regime change.

Who are the key players? The primary actors are Iran’s supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, representing the Iranian government, and US President Donald Trump, leading the American response. Key figures within Iran, like Tehran prosecutor Ali Salehi and Ayatollah Ahmed Khatami, are also central to the escalating tensions.

What has happened so far? The crisis unfolded with escalating rhetoric from both sides. Khamenei accused the US of instigating the unrest,while Trump threatened military intervention and demanded a change in Iranian leadership. The US issued warnings about potential Iranian attacks on American bases, and Iran has continued a crackdown on protesters, including threats of execution.

How did it end? After days of heightened tension,the crisis de-escalated on January 22,2026,following back-channel negotiations brokered by Switzerland. Trump agreed to temporarily suspend threats of military action in exchange for Khamenei halting the immediate execution of protesters and agreeing to limited international monitoring of human rights within Iran. While the underlying issues remain unresolved, the immediate threat of conflict was averted. The US also agreed to reconsider some economic sanctions, contingent on demonstrable progress in human rights.the situation remains fragile, with ongoing internal repression within Iran and continued distrust between the two nations.

You may also like

Leave a Comment