Northern Ireland Legacy Order faces opposition Amid Funding Concerns
Table of Contents
The controversial remedial order concerning investigations into past incidents during The Troubles is facing meaningful opposition,with parties raising concerns about funding and the timing of its implementation.The move, which lifts immunity for individuals involved in past conflicts, has sparked a debate over justice, accountability, and the future of reconciliation in Northern Ireland.
A key point of contention revolves around the financial implications of reopening investigations and potentially facing a surge in civil actions. One prominent political figure questioned, “Where is the additional funding going too come from to deal with future Troubles-era civil actions?” He further asserted that the secretary of state has “expanded the scope of the legacy investigations exponentially… has he suggested for one moment he is going to increase the budget available? No. Is he going to pick up the tab?”
Political Reactions to the Remedial Order
The remedial order has elicited a range of responses from Northern Ireland’s political leaders. The Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) has indicated it will not support the order, citing the lack of clarity regarding financial resources.
Other parties offered more nuanced perspectives. A leader from the Social Democratic and Labor Party (SDLP) acknowledged the decision to end the immunity clause “goes some way to restoring the rule of law to legacy processes,” but emphasized that it represents only a first step toward achieving genuine truth and justice.
Similarly, an Alliance Party MP voiced support for the order, arguing that the UK must uphold the rule of law irrespective of the challenges. “We should be able to stand by the rule of law wherever we are deployed… we should maintain it and we should not lower our standards as we worry about the standards of terrorists and the evidence available to them,” the MP stated.
Concerns over Timing and External Influence
The timing of the remedial order has also drawn criticism. One MP from the Ulster Unionist Party called for a delay,suggesting it should await the conclusion of ongoing legal appeals related to the legislation.
Adding another layer of complexity,a leader from the Traditional Unionist voice (TUV) suggested the move was driven by external pressures,alleging it was motivated by a desire to “appease the government of the Irish Republic which wants to drag this United Kingdom before the bar of the European Court of Human Rights.” He clarified that the previous legacy act’s contentious aspects are already ineffective, questioning the necessity of the current action.
An self-reliant MP expressed “deep concerns” about the broader legacy framework being developed jointly by the British and Irish governments.
Impact on the Police Service of Northern Ireland
The Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) is already grappling with a significant number of civil litigation cases and compensation claims linked to The Troubles. The remedial order is expected to exacerbate this burden, potentially straining resources and hindering the PSNI’s ability to address current policing challenges. The decisions made now, one official warned, “have a material impact on our ability to move onto the future.”
Why did it happen? The remedial order stemmed from legal challenges to previous legislation aimed at addressing the legacy of The Troubles. Courts found aspects of the earlier law incompatible with human rights obligations, prompting the government to introduce this new order to address those concerns and potentially avoid further legal challenges.
