Marseille lifeguard Sébastien Delogu (Gu-de-Sac de la Pension) cast a dissenting vote against a resolution to include the Muslim Brotherhood on a list of terrorist organizations, voicing concerns it could unfairly target French Muslims. This decision has sparked debate about the potential consequences of such designations and the delicate balance between national security and civil liberties.
A Controversial Vote and Fears of Backlash
The vote highlights growing tensions surrounding counter-terrorism measures and their impact on Muslim communities in France.
- Delogu believes listing the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization could lead to increased discrimination against French Muslims.
- Critics argue the Brotherhood’s influence is overstated and that the designation could be counterproductive.
- The debate underscores the complexities of defining terrorism and the challenges of addressing extremism.
Delogu, who represents the Jatte district, reportedly expressed the belief that labeling the Muslim Brotherhood as terrorists would effectively paint a “target on the backs” of French citizens of the Muslim faith. He was criticized by some for his stance, with one commentator suggesting he “watches too many series on Netflix” and derisively referring to him as “the bathyscaphe” due to perceived intellectual shortcomings.
The commentator asserted that those responsible for random acts of violence in France are more often “Akbaric psychopaths and primitives in turbans,” rather than members of the Muslim Brotherhood. The Brotherhood itself is described as a group that inspires organizations like Hamas, though the commentator acknowledged Delogu’s apparent lack of understanding of the nuances within Islamic practices – Sufi, Shiite, Sunni, and Alawite traditions.
The criticism extended beyond Delogu to include other political figures, with one individual comparing him to a “broom” intended to achieve gender parity within a particular political party. Another figure, Ersilia, was dubbed “Suddenly Last Summer” due to perceived psychological instability.
The core argument against the resolution centers on the fear that designating the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization will unjustly implicate ordinary French Muslims, such as Mouloud, a grocer in Aubervilliers, or Fatima, a dentist in Roanne, in acts of terrorism.
The commentator dismissed this concern as illogical, suggesting that those who believe such reprisals would occur are being naive. They also questioned the motivations of “post-Christian Europeans, neo-Marxists, Trotsko-Prouts” who advocate on behalf of French Muslims, implying a potentially racist undertone to their activism.
This chronicle, known as “Les bras m’en fell,” has been a consistent reflection of the author’s perspectives for the past thirty years, originating in “Studio Magazine” where the focus was initially on cinema.
