The strikes against Iran early Saturday, which resulted in the death of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran’s supreme leader, are now intertwined with former President Donald Trump’s repeated claims of election interference, raising concerns that the situation could be leveraged to undermine the upcoming 2026 midterm elections. Trump has directly linked the military action to allegations that Iran attempted to influence the 2020 and 2024 U.S. Presidential elections, a connection that democracy advocates warn could be a precursor to an unprecedented power grab.
On his Truth Social platform, Trump shared a headline from a far-right news site stating, “Iran tried to interfere in 2020, 2024 elections to stop Trump, and now faces renewed war with United States.” He also posted the headline as text, amplifying the narrative that the military action was, in part, a response to alleged Iranian interference in U.S. Democratic processes. This framing has sparked alarm among election security experts and legal scholars, who fear Trump may attempt to exploit the current crisis to justify extraordinary measures regarding the upcoming elections.
The timing of these developments coincides with reports that the White House is considering a draft executive order that would grant Trump significant control over the electoral process, a move widely considered unconstitutional. Democracy Docket reported that the draft order, reportedly coordinated with anti-voting activists, would ban no-excuse mail voting and potentially outlaw the use of voting machines.
Concerns Over a Declared Emergency
Democracy advocates are voicing strong concerns that Trump is laying the groundwork to declare a national emergency, citing the conflict with Iran as justification for circumventing established electoral procedures. Ian Bassin, executive director of Protect Democracy, articulated these fears in a post on BlueSky: “Sadly, This represents about the next election,” he wrote. “He’s laying the groundwork to declare his election ’emergency’ to change rules and argue to courts they can’t question his national security judgment in war time. And if the Court does, he’s preparing to say that’s beyond their constitutional powers.”
The fear is that a declared emergency would allow Trump to bypass legal challenges to any actions taken to influence the election, arguing that national security concerns supersede constitutional protections. This could include altering voter registration rules, restricting access to polling places, or even attempting to directly oversee the vote count. Such actions would represent a significant departure from established democratic norms and could severely undermine the integrity of the 2026 midterm elections.
Echoes of the “Big Lie”
Marc Elias, a prominent Democratic election lawyer and founder of Democracy Docket, echoed these concerns, warning that Trump is attempting to establish a novel narrative. “The next Big Lie is taking shape right in front of us,” Elias wrote on BlueSky. “Donald Trump will try to use this to assert illegal and unconstitutional powers over the 2026 elections.”
This warning draws a parallel to Trump’s previous false claims of widespread voter fraud in the 2020 election, which fueled the January 6th attack on the U.S. Capitol. The current situation, however, presents a different and potentially more dangerous scenario, as it involves the use of military force and a direct appeal to national security concerns to justify actions that could undermine the democratic process. The New York Times reported that Republicans largely supported the decision to strike Iran, whereas Democrats mostly opposed it, but divisions appeared in both parties.
The Draft Executive Order and its Implications
The draft executive order circulating within the White House, as detailed by Democracy Docket on Friday, outlines a series of measures that would significantly restrict voting access. Beyond banning no-excuse mail voting and voting machines, the order reportedly includes provisions that could allow for the appointment of partisan poll watchers with broad authority and the invalidation of voter registrations based on unsubstantiated claims of fraud.
Legal experts widely agree that such an order would be unconstitutional, exceeding the president’s authority and violating fundamental voting rights. However, the concern is that Trump may attempt to implement the order anyway, relying on the argument that the current national security crisis justifies extraordinary measures. The legal battles that would inevitably follow could further destabilize the political landscape and create uncertainty surrounding the 2026 elections.
The BBC reported that Trump may be forced to wage a political battle at home while presiding over a new war in the Middle East.
The situation remains fluid, and the full extent of Trump’s plans is still unclear. However, the convergence of the military strikes against Iran, the claims of election interference, and the draft executive order raises serious concerns about the future of American democracy. The coming weeks and months will be critical in determining whether these concerns are realized and whether the 2026 midterm elections will be conducted fairly and freely.
The next key development will be any official statement from the White House regarding the draft executive order and the legal justification for the military action in Iran. Further scrutiny of Trump’s public statements and actions will be essential to understanding his intentions and assessing the potential threat to the electoral process.
Share your thoughts on this developing story in the comments below.
