Rancho Santa Fe’s governing body, the RSFA Board, faced renewed criticism this week after a special meeting to announce an interim appointment to the Art Jury concluded without allowing for public comment. The incident, which occurred during Spring Break, has sparked concerns among Covenant residents about the accessibility of board meetings and the value placed on member participation. The core issue, as several residents articulated, centers on a feeling that their voices are not being adequately heard in decisions impacting the community.
The frustration isn’t isolated to this single event. Residents say a recent policy change limiting public comments to the beginning of meetings has already curtailed meaningful engagement. This structure, they argue, prevents the board from hearing perspectives at the most relevant time – when a specific issue is being actively discussed and considered for a vote. The situation highlights a broader debate about transparency and inclusivity within the homeowners association, which prides itself on a strong sense of community.
According to multiple attendees, the April 15th Zoom meeting was called specifically to announce the appointment of Bruce Jordan as the interim member of the Art Jury. Mr. Jordan previously served on the Art Jury and his return was welcomed by some. Still, the swiftness of the meeting – President David Gamboa announced the appointment, thanked applicants, and immediately moved to adjourn – left at least five prepared Covenant members without an opportunity to address the board. When a director inquired about public input, President Gamboa reportedly stated that it would not be taken before adjourning the meeting.
The “Family” Dynamic and Resident Concerns
The situation has ignited a debate about the board’s approach to member engagement. President Gamboa has reportedly referred to Covenant residents as “The Family,” a sentiment that many appreciate. However, as Kelli Hillard, a Covenant resident and former Art Jury member, pointed out, a functional family makes room for all voices, even the “colorful characters.” Hillard’s perspective, shared with the RSF Post, underscores the belief that the Rancho Santa Fe lifestyle depends on residents feeling confident that their input matters.
The RSFA is not a municipal government, but a homeowners association built on neighbor-to-neighbor interaction. This distinction, residents argue, necessitates a higher degree of accessibility and responsiveness from the board. The current meeting structure, with limited opportunities for comment, is seen as a departure from that principle. The concern isn’t simply about objecting to decisions, but about having a genuine opportunity to contribute to the decision-making process.
Understanding the Art Jury and Recent Appointments
The Art Jury plays a crucial role in maintaining the aesthetic character of Rancho Santa Fe. According to the RSFA website, the jury reviews and approves or denies applications for architectural changes to properties within the Covenant. The interim appointment of Bruce Jordan follows a period of transition within the jury, and the process of filling the position has drawn scrutiny from some residents who believe the selection process lacked transparency.
While the RSFA has not publicly released details about the applicant pool for the interim position, the swiftness of the appointment and the lack of public discussion have fueled concerns about whether all perspectives were adequately considered. The Art Jury’s decisions have a direct impact on property values and the overall character of the community, making the appointment process particularly sensitive.
The Evolving Meeting Policy and its Impact
The current policy limiting member comments to the beginning of meetings has been a point of contention for several months. Critics argue that this approach effectively silences residents when their input is most valuable – during the discussion of a specific item. By front-loading public comment, the board misses the opportunity to hear how residents react to the information presented and to address concerns in real-time.
This structure contrasts with practices in other homeowners associations, where public comment periods are often integrated throughout the meeting agenda, allowing for a more dynamic and responsive dialogue. Some residents have suggested adopting a similar model in Rancho Santa Fe, arguing that it would foster a more collaborative and inclusive environment.
The recent decision to forgo public comment altogether at the April 15th meeting, even after a director specifically asked about it, has exacerbated these concerns. It has reinforced the perception that member participation is not genuinely welcomed, but rather tolerated as a formality.
Looking ahead, the next RSFA Board meeting is scheduled for May 20th. The agenda, when published, will likely outline the topics to be discussed and provide information about opportunities for public comment. Residents are encouraged to review the agenda and participate in the meeting to voice their concerns and contribute to the ongoing dialogue about governance and community engagement.
This situation underscores the importance of open communication and collaboration between the RSFA Board and the Covenant residents. Finding a balance between efficient governance and meaningful member participation will be crucial to preserving the unique character and quality of life in Rancho Santa Fe.
We encourage readers to share their thoughts on this issue in the comments below. Your perspectives are valuable as we continue to cover this important story.
Related reading
