The reverberations are still shaking Italian football. For the first time in its history, the Azzurri have failed to qualify for three consecutive World Cups – 2018, 2022, and now, the 2026 tournament co-hosted by the United States, Canada, and Mexico. This unprecedented failure, dubbed the “third doomsday” by Italian media, has ignited a firestorm of criticism, largely directed at Gabriele Gravina, the president of the Italian Football Federation (FIGC). Despite widespread calls for his resignation, Gravina has steadfastly refused to accept responsibility for the national team’s continued struggles, a decision that has triggered an explosive public backlash and deepened the crisis within Italian football.
The immediate trigger for the current uproar was Italy’s shocking playoff defeat to North Macedonia in March 2024, a result that extinguished any remaining hope of reaching the 2026 World Cup. Whereas the loss itself was devastating, it was Gravina’s subsequent response – or lack thereof – that proved to be the breaking point. Instead of acknowledging systemic failures or offering a path forward, Gravina defended his leadership and pointed fingers at the players and coaching staff. This stance, perceived as arrogant and dismissive by many, has fueled a growing movement demanding his removal. The situation highlights the deep-seated issues plaguing Italian football, from youth development to infrastructure and governance.
A History of Disappointment and Growing Anger
Italy’s descent into footballing wilderness began with the stunning failure to qualify for the 2018 World Cup in Russia, losing to Sweden in a playoff. That defeat was considered a wake-up call, but the national team’s performance in the following years, including a disappointing Euro 2020 campaign (despite winning the tournament), did little to assuage concerns. The 2022 World Cup qualification failure, this time at the hands of North Macedonia, was a further blow. Now, with a third consecutive absence from the world’s biggest sporting event confirmed, the pressure on Gravina and the FIGC has reached an unbearable level. The repeated failures have not only damaged the nation’s sporting pride but similarly raised serious questions about the future of Italian football.
The current crisis isn’t simply about on-field results. Critics argue that Gravina’s leadership has been marked by a lack of vision, poor financial management, and a failure to address the structural problems that have hampered Italian football for years. Concerns have been raised about the state of youth academies, the lack of investment in infrastructure, and the outdated coaching methods that are prevalent throughout the country. The Italian football system, once renowned for its tactical innovation and defensive prowess, is now struggling to compete with the modern game.
Gravina Defends His Position Amidst Public Outcry
Despite the mounting pressure, Gravina has remained defiant. In a press conference following the playoff defeat, he stated, “I will not resign. I have a responsibility to rebuild Italian football, and I will not shirk that responsibility.” He went on to blame the players for a lack of “killer instinct” and criticized the coaching staff for failing to implement a winning strategy. These comments were widely condemned by former players, coaches, and journalists, who accused Gravina of attempting to deflect blame and avoid accountability.
The Italian media has been relentless in its criticism of Gravina. La Gazzetta dello Sport, Italy’s leading sports newspaper, published an editorial calling for his immediate resignation, stating that his continued presence at the helm of the FIGC would be “detrimental to the future of Italian football.” Other prominent publications have echoed this sentiment, with many questioning Gravina’s competence and integrity. Social media has also been ablaze with angry messages and calls for his removal, with the hashtag #GravinaDimettiti (Gravina Resign) trending for days.
Stakeholders and Potential Paths Forward
The fallout from Italy’s World Cup failure extends beyond Gravina and the FIGC. The Italian national team’s sponsors are reportedly considering withdrawing their support, and television ratings for Serie A, the Italian top-flight league, are expected to decline. The crisis also has implications for Italian football’s international reputation and its ability to attract investment.
Several potential paths forward have been proposed. Some are calling for a complete overhaul of the FIGC, with the appointment of a recent president and a new board of directors. Others are advocating for a more comprehensive reform of the Italian football system, including increased investment in youth development, improved infrastructure, and a modernization of coaching methods. There’s also a growing debate about the role of foreign ownership in Serie A, with some arguing that it has contributed to the league’s decline.
The Italian Olympic Committee (CONI) is now under increasing pressure to intervene. While CONI has limited direct authority over the FIGC, it can exert influence through its oversight role and its ability to appoint independent administrators. However, any intervention by CONI is likely to be met with resistance from Gravina and his supporters. The situation remains fluid and unpredictable, and the future of Italian football hangs in the balance. The failure to qualify for the 2026 World Cup represents a critical juncture for the sport in Italy, and the decisions made in the coming weeks and months will have a profound impact on its long-term prospects.
The next key date is April 15th, when the FIGC is scheduled to hold an emergency meeting to discuss the national team’s failure and the future of Italian football. It remains to be seen whether Gravina will finally succumb to the pressure and resign, or whether he will continue to cling to power. What is certain is that the crisis within Italian football is far from over.
What do you think should happen next? Share your thoughts in the comments below and share this article with fellow football fans.
