Indonesia is fundamentally restructuring its approach to urban waste management, introducing a comprehensive overhaul of its waste-to-energy (WtE) regulatory framework to attract global capital and resolve long-standing infrastructure bottlenecks. The shift marks a transition from a fragmented, municipality-led approach to a centrally coordinated strategy designed to provide the commercial predictability required by international lenders.
Central to this transition is Presidential Regulation No. 109 of 2025, which replaces the previous 2018 system. By streamlining institutional roles and introducing a unified national tariff, the government aims to create a more stable environment for private sector investment. This move is a critical component of Indonesia’s broader environmental strategy as the nation works toward its net zero emissions target by 2060 or earlier.
The recent framework designates WtE as a national development priority, signaling a move away from the inconsistent project implementation that characterized the last decade. For the first time, the government has established a clear, transparent mechanism for investor selection, aimed at reducing the perceived risks that previously deterred major global infrastructure firms.
A Centralized Model for Commercial Certainty
The most significant change under the new regulation is the elevation of the central government’s role in project delivery. Under the previous 2018 regime, WtE initiatives were often driven by individual cities, leading to a patchwork of varying standards, tariffs, and procurement rules. This fragmentation created significant hurdles for developers who required standardized contracts to secure financing.

The 2025 framework introduces a unified national tariff, which removes the need for investors to negotiate individual pricing structures with dozens of different municipal governments. This standardization is intended to lower the cost of capital and accelerate the timeline from project conception to commissioning.
A pivotal actor in this new ecosystem is Danantara, the state investment holding body. By positioning Danantara as a central coordinator for WtE projects nationwide, the government is providing a single point of accountability and a more robust financial backstop for the delivery of these high-cap projects.
Key Regulatory Shifts: 2018 vs. 2025
| Feature | 2018 Framework | 2025 Framework (Reg No. 109) |
|---|---|---|
| Governance | Municipally driven / Fragmented | Central government-aligned |
| Pricing | Variable/Local tariffs | Unified national tariff |
| Coordination | Decentralized | Led by Danantara (State Holding) |
| Selection | Varying procurement methods | Transparent investor mechanism |
Strategic Implementation and Global Interest
The government is not merely updating the rulebook; This proves moving immediately into the procurement phase. Ten initial locations have been identified for WtE implementation. Several of these sites—including Greater Bogor, Bekasi City, Denpasar, and Yogyakarta—have already entered the first stage of tendering.
These tenders, which launched between late 2025 and early 2026, serve as a litmus test for the new regulations. The rapid push through procurement suggests a determination to clear the backlog of urban waste issues that have plagued Indonesia’s major cities, where landfills are reaching critical capacity.
The international response has been immediate. Prequalified sponsors for these projects include major global firms from Japan, China, Europe, and Singapore. This diverse pool of interest indicates that the shift toward a coordinated, central government-aligned structure has successfully addressed the primary concerns of international lenders regarding predictability and risk mitigation.
Remaining Risks and Implementation Hurdles
Despite the optimistic outlook for investors, the transition is not without risk. Industry analysts note that the success of the 2025 reforms depends on the government’s ability to ensure the ongoing viability of the WtE industry beyond the initial tendering phase. For developers, the primary concerns remain centered on long-term waste supply guarantees and the efficient integration of WtE plants into the national power grid.
The shift to a centralized model also requires seamless cooperation between the central government and the local administrations in the ten priority cities. While Danantara provides the overarching structure, the physical land acquisition and daily waste collection remain local operational challenges that could potentially stall project timelines if not managed with precision.
the move toward WtE must be balanced with Indonesia’s broader waste management goals. While energy recovery is a priority, the integration of circular economy principles—such as improved sorting and recycling—will be essential to ensure that these plants are not simply incentivizing the production of more waste to meet energy quotas.
Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice.
The next critical checkpoint for the industry will be the conclusion of the first stage of tendering for the initial ten priority sites. The announcement of the winning sponsors and the subsequent signing of power purchase agreements (PPAs) will provide the first concrete evidence of the new framework’s efficacy in translating regulatory reform into operational infrastructure.
We invite readers to share their perspectives on Indonesia’s infrastructure shift in the comments below or via our social channels.
