The Charleston Housing Authority is moving to resolve mounting questions surrounding its new leadership, announcing a search for an independent firm to investigate allegations against CEO Nathan Simms. The move comes as the agency seeks to balance the professional experience of its top executive with the need for public transparency in the management of city housing resources.
As of May 8, the authority is vetting three candidate firms to conduct a comprehensive review of the accusations. To ensure the integrity of the findings, the board is specifically seeking a firm that maintains no prior relationship with the agency or with Simms’ former employer, providing a layer of separation intended to eliminate conflicts of interest. Board member Voigt indicated that a final selection will be made within seven to 10 days.
The investigation is not intended to be a narrow inquiry. According to Voigt, the board intends for the process to “thoroughly go through every potentially meritorious accusation,” ensuring the scope is as broad as possible. This rigorous approach, Voigt noted, is a matter of accountability to both the residents served by the authority and the City of Charleston at large.
Addressing the Norfolk Termination
Central to the current scrutiny is Simms’ departure from the Norfolk Housing Authority in Virginia. In a move toward transparency, Voigt confirmed that the Charleston Housing Authority was “absolutely” aware that Simms had been terminated from his previous position before he was hired in Charleston. However, the board maintained that their due diligence led them to believe the termination was not “personal to Nathan Simms.”
Voigt stated that those responsible for the hiring process engaged with individuals familiar with the internal operations of the Norfolk organization. Despite the termination, the board concluded that the information reviewed did not warrant stopping the hiring process. Voigt has since staked his own reputation on the decision, suggesting that the agency will be able to provide definitive answers to the public in the coming weeks.
The controversy largely centers on the handling of agency resources. Simms has pushed back against the narrative that he mismanaged funds, specifically pointing to his adherence to established protocols. “What I will say is that I worked through our procurement channels with the agency, knowing I never have and never will be reckless with resources to just give to people,” Simms said. He maintained that he followed a strict process and stands by his professional conduct.
A Career Defined by Mobility and Local Ties
Nathan Simms arrives in Charleston not as a stranger, but as someone with deep ancestral roots in the region. His mother is from the area, his father is buried in the city, and he maintains a network of extended family, including aunts, uncles, and cousins, who still reside there. Simms has expressed a personal sense of pride in being selected to lead an agency in a city with such significant family meaning.
Professionally, Simms brings over two decades of experience in housing and community development. However, his trajectory is marked by significant movement. A review of his professional history reveals a high volume of transitions; according to his LinkedIn profile, he has held eight different roles across various states within the last 10 years.
While some may view this mobility as a breadth of experience across different regulatory environments, others have questioned the stability of his tenures. The upcoming independent investigation is expected to clarify whether these transitions were routine professional advancements or linked to the “selective narratives” Simms claims are currently being used against him.
Investigation Timeline and Milestones
The board has established a tight window for the initial phase of this process to prevent prolonged instability within the agency’s leadership.
| Phase | Action Item | Estimated Timeline |
|---|---|---|
| Selection | Vetting of three independent candidate firms | May 8 – May 18 |
| Initiation | Formal engagement of the chosen firm | Mid-to-late May |
| Discovery | Review of procurement files and “meritorious accusations” | TBD |
| Reporting | Public delivery of findings to the Board | TBD |
Impact on Charleston Housing Operations
The timing of this investigation is critical. Housing authorities manage federal funds—primarily from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)—to provide affordable housing and support services to low-income residents. Any perceived instability or mismanagement in procurement can lead to federal audits or a loss of confidence from municipal partners.
By commissioning an independent review, the board is attempting to preempt a larger crisis of confidence. The focus on “procurement channels” suggests that the investigation will look closely at how contracts were awarded and whether any policies were bypassed to expedite projects or favor specific vendors.
Simms has welcomed the board’s willingness to conduct the review, viewing it as an opportunity to move beyond fragmented reports and establish a factual record of his performance. He continues to lead the agency while the selection of the investigative firm is finalized.
Disclaimer: This report concerns an ongoing administrative investigation. All individuals mentioned are presumed to have acted in accordance with agency policy unless findings are formally issued by the appointed investigative firm.
The next confirmed checkpoint in this process will be the announcement of the selected investigative firm, expected by mid-May. Once the firm is onboarded, the board is expected to provide a more concrete timeline for the delivery of the final report.
Do you believe independent reviews are sufficient for public agency accountability? Share your thoughts in the comments or share this story to keep the community informed.
