A presidential pardon is intended to provide a definitive closing of a legal chapter, a gesture of clemency that allows an individual to move past their convictions. But for Nicole Minetti, the former Lombardy regional councilor once central to the scandals surrounding Silvio Berlusconi, that closure is being threatened by a voice emerging from the shores of Uruguay.
Mabel De Los Santos Torres, a massage therapist who spent two decades working at the estate of renowned restaurateur Giuseppe Cipriani in Punta del Este, has come forward with a series of detailed and damaging allegations. In a wide-ranging interview with Il Fatto Quotidiano, Torres claims that the lifestyle for which Minetti was previously convicted in Italy—the facilitation of prostitution—did not end with her legal troubles in Europe, but instead found a new, opulent sanctuary in South America.
The allegations center on the “Gin Tonic” finca, a luxury estate where Torres describes a sophisticated “system” of parties involving high-profile entrepreneurs, international politicians, and young women brought in from Brazil, Argentina, Italy, and Uruguay. According to Torres, Minetti was not a mere guest at these gatherings but a central operative, allegedly managing the selection and appearance of the women recruited for the estate’s guests.
The ‘Gin Tonic’ System: Allegations of Excess and Control
Torres describes a transformation of the Cipriani estate over the years. What began as high-society gatherings for the jet set eventually evolved, she claims, into a structured environment where alcohol, drugs, and sex were the primary currencies. The witness describes an atmosphere of intimidation, specifically noting that Minetti’s arrival often shifted the mood among the women on site to one of “fear.”
According to the testimony, Minetti’s role was meticulous. Torres alleges that the former dental hygienist oversaw everything from the clothing the girls wore to their visits to the hairdresser, ensuring they met the specific standards of the “important guests” visiting the finca. These guests allegedly included influential political figures from both Italy and Uruguay, as well as wealthy business leaders.
The allegations extend beyond the organization of parties. Torres claims she herself was subjected to harassment, stating that Giuseppe Cipriani demanded increasingly intimate massages. She asserts that when she finally refused his advances, her professional relationship with the estate ended abruptly.
Legal Implications and the Presidential Pardon
The timing of these revelations is particularly sensitive. In February, Nicole Minetti was granted a pardon, a move that effectively wiped away the punitive effects of her previous convictions. However, the Italian legal system is now weighing whether these new claims suggest that the conditions justifying the pardon were based on a false premise of rehabilitation.
The General Prosecutor’s Office in Milan is currently evaluating the possibility of interviewing Torres. The Italian Ministry of Justice has already issued a nulla osta (clearance), allowing magistrates to proceed with a rogatoria—a formal request for judicial assistance from Uruguayan authorities—to interrogate Torres and other former employees of the estate.
The core of the judicial inquiry is to determine if Minetti continued the exact activities for which she was originally sentenced while residing abroad. If proven, such continuity would cast a significant shadow over the legal and political process that led to her pardon.
| Period/Event | Legal Status/Action | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Initial Conviction | Sentenced | Facilitation of prostitution in Italy. |
| February (Recent) | Pardon Granted | Presidential clemency granted to erase sentence. |
| Current Phase | Judicial Review | Milan Prosecutor evaluating testimony from Uruguay. |
The Defense: ‘A Violent Media Campaign’
The defense team for Nicole Minetti and Giuseppe Cipriani has reacted with sharp denials, dismissing the claims as entirely fabricated. Attorneys Emanuele Fisicaro and Antonella Calcaterra have characterized the reporting by Il Fatto Quotidiano as a targeted attempt to smear their clients’ reputations.
“These are completely untrue circumstances that can be easily refuted with documents in hand,” the lawyers stated. They further argued that the appearance of this testimony weeks after previous reports suggests a coordinated “violent media campaign” rather than a legitimate legal discovery.
The defense has indicated that they intend to pursue legal action against all parties responsible for disseminating these claims, asserting that the allegations regarding the couple’s lifestyle in Uruguay have no basis in reality.
What Remains Unknown
While Torres has expressed a willingness to testify before Milanese prosecutors, a critical hurdle remains: her safety. She has stated that she will only provide formal testimony if she is granted protection, citing a genuine fear of retaliation. Until the rogatoria is fully executed and Torres is interviewed under official judicial safeguards, her claims remain allegations rather than sworn evidence.
the specific identities of the “politicians and entrepreneurs” mentioned by Torres have not been disclosed, leaving the full scope of the alleged network unclear.
The next critical checkpoint in this case will be the formal decision by the Milan Prosecutor’s Office on whether to fly to Uruguay or conduct the interviews via international judicial channels. This determination will dictate whether Mabel De Los Santos Torres’s account moves from the pages of a newspaper into the official court record.
Do you believe presidential pardons should be revocable if new evidence of continuing criminal activity emerges? Share your thoughts in the comments below.
Related reading
