For decades, the architecture of French influence in Africa was built on a foundation of linguistic kinship and colonial legacy—a system known as Françafrique. But this week in Nairobi, President Emmanuel Macron is attempting to dismantle that old blueprint in favor of something more pragmatic and less provocative.
The “Africa Forward” summit, gathering more than 30 heads of state and government in Kenya’s capital, marks a significant diplomatic pivot. For the first time since the French-African summit tradition began in 1973, the event is being held in a non-francophone country. The choice of venue is not merely logistical; it is a public admission that France’s traditional sphere of influence in West and Central Africa is fracturing.
Macron arrives in Nairobi at a moment of profound vulnerability for French diplomacy on the continent. In recent years, Paris has been forced into a series of humbling retreats, withdrawing troops from former strongholds like Mali, Niger, and Chad. These exits were often preceded by military coups fueled by a virulent strain of anti-French sentiment, with local populations and new military juntas accusing Paris of neocolonialism and meddling in sovereign affairs.
By shifting the summit’s center of gravity to East Africa, Macron is betting that he can repackage France as a partner of choice for the entire continent, rather than a former colonial master clinging to a shrinking map of francophone allies.
A Strategic Pivot Toward the Anglophone Hub
The “Africa Forward” summit is designed to move the conversation away from the baggage of the Sahel and toward global priorities. The agenda reflects a broader, more economic approach, focusing on the reform of international financial architecture, energy transition, and peace and security. The event was preceded by a series of workshops targeting youth, sports, and the creative industries—sectors that resonate with Africa’s burgeoning young population more than old defense treaties do.
Analysts suggest that Nairobi is the ideal laboratory for this experiment. Under President William Ruto, Kenya has aggressively positioned itself as a global convening hub, recently hosting the inaugural Africa Climate Summit and leading a security mission in Haiti. For Macron, Ruto represents a new kind of African partner: a leader with significant international clout who is not tied to France’s colonial history.
Mikhail Nyamweya, an international relations analyst, notes that the summit signals an attempt to move “beyond its old francophone comfort zone.” According to Nyamweya, France is attempting to present its relationship with Africa as broader and more economic, utilizing an anglophone diplomatic hub to signal that the era of Françafrique is over.
The Cost of Colonial Legacy
The necessity of this pivot is underscored by the collapse of French relations in West Africa. Since 2022, the “traditional sphere of influence” has become a liability. In countries like Mali and Niger, the presence of French troops—once seen as a security guarantee—became a symbol of foreign occupation. This sentiment provided the political oxygen for military coups that explicitly targeted French interests.
The fallout has been swift. France has seen its defense agreements terminated and its military personnel expelled. While Macron has attempted to frame these transitions as natural evolutions, the reality is a strategic retreat. During a joint press briefing with President Ruto, Macron acknowledged the changing dynamics, though he attempted to decouple the political failures from the people themselves.
“We can disagree with some of these governments, but we never disagree with people,” Macron said, referring to the absence of leaders from Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger. “We love these people.”
To visualize the shift in French strategy, the following table compares the traditional Françafrique model with the “Africa Forward” approach:
| Feature | Traditional Françafrique | “Africa Forward” Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Focus | Political & Military Influence | Economic & Energy Partnership |
| Geographic Scope | Former Francophone Colonies | Pan-African / Diversified |
| Key Driver | Colonial Legacy/Language | Mutual Interests/Shared Goals |
| Security Model | Permanent Military Bases | Training & Targeted Exercises |
The Kenya Connection and Sovereignty Concerns
The partnership between Macron and Ruto is not without its own frictions. Last year, the two nations struck a defense agreement that has drawn sharp criticism from Kenyan civil society and opposition groups. Critics argue the deal compromises Kenya’s sovereignty, specifically citing clauses that may grant French soldiers legal immunity while operating on Kenyan soil.

The military footprint is already visible. In March, 800 French military personnel arrived in Kenya for training and security exercises. For Ruto, the deal is a way to bolster Kenya’s security capabilities and solidify its status as a regional power. For Macron, it provides a new strategic anchor in East Africa to offset the losses in the West.
Macharia Munene, a scholar of history and international relations, suggests What we have is a “convergence of interests.” He notes that Macron is seeking a global leadership role and needs reliable companions in Africa to maintain France’s relevance on the world stage.
Key Stakeholders and Their Interests
- Emmanuel Macron: Seeking to maintain French relevance in Africa while shedding the “neocolonial” label.
- William Ruto: Positioning Kenya as a primary diplomatic and security hub for the continent.
- Sahelian Juntas: Driving a wedge between France and West African states to consolidate their own power.
- African Union: Pushing for a more equitable “international financial architecture” to support developing economies.
Whether this “paradigm shift” will be viewed as a genuine evolution or a desperate rebranding remains to be seen. The absence of the Sahelian leaders casts a long shadow over the proceedings, reminding the attendees that while France may be looking forward, the ghosts of its colonial past are not easily exorcised.
The success of this new strategy will likely be measured by the tangible outcomes of the energy and financial agreements discussed this week. The next critical benchmark will be the follow-up implementation meetings scheduled for later this year, where the “tangible results” Macron promised will be put to the test.
Do you think France can truly move past its colonial legacy in Africa, or is this simply a change in branding? Share your thoughts in the comments below.
