Elon Musk’s artificial intelligence company, xAI, filed a federal lawsuit in Minnesota on Monday challenging a newly enacted state law that bans artificial intelligence “nudification” tools. The legal challenge targets a statute carrying severe fines that is scheduled to take effect on Saturday, August 1, 2026.
The artificial intelligence company sued Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison in federal court to block a first-of-its-kind statute designed to outlaw apps and websites that generate non-consensual sexualized imagery using real photographs of individuals. Known formally as HF 1606, the legislation was signed into law earlier this year by Gov. Tim Walz after passing through the state legislature with overwhelming support, securing a 132-1 vote in the House and a 65-0 vote in the Senate.
Attorneys for the artificial intelligence firm argue in the federal complaint that the statute imposes an overbroad, content-based ban on free speech and the tools of visual expression
in a clumsy attempt to prohibit the creation of explicit deepfakes.
First Amendment Claims and Penalty Calculations
The legal friction centers on the financial and regulatory exposure the statute creates for technology platforms. Under the provisions drafted by lawmakers, victims or the state attorney general’s office can pursue civil lawsuits for damages of at least $500,000 for each unlawful access or generation event, or levy $500,000 fines each time an explicit deepfake is created.
Legal representation for the corporate entity calculated that these cumulative penalties could quickly become catastrophic for any digital enterprise costing a business whose users created 100,000 prohibited images an eye-popping $50 billion dollars.
The company contends the statute imposes strict liability on AI providers regardless of built-in filters, user compliance agreements, or whether the depicted individuals actually consented to the creation of the image.
Furthermore, the complaint asserts that the statutory definition of intimate parts is overly broad, potentially including depictions of men without shirts, individuals wearing shorts or swimsuits, and materials containing artistic, scientific, political, satirical, educational, medical, or religious value.
Legislative Origins and State Response
The statute was spearheaded during the legislative session by Sen. Erin Maye Quade, (DFL-Apple Valley), after she discovered an incident involving a man who used social media photographs to manufacture non-consensual sexualized media of more than 80 women he knew without their consent. House leadership sponsor Rep. Jess Hanson (DFL-Burnsville) voiced sharp criticism of the legal challenge in a public statement.
“It’s absolutely disgusting that Elon Musk and his xAI are fighting a law designed to protect children from sexual exploitation. Nudification is simply an indefensible tool of AI. As the use of AI continues to grow, so does its potential harms, with nudification features being among the most urgent to address – and that’s exactly why we banned them in Minnesota.”
Rep. Jess Hanson (DFL-Burnsville), via AOL
State enforcement officials similarly rejected the challenge. Attorney General Keith Ellison noted that while his office awaited formal service of the legal papers, the core objective of the legislation remained sound stating that using artificial intelligence to generate nude images against an individual’s will robs the target of their dignity and can cause immense harm on an emotional, personal, and professional level.
Governor Walz responded to the federal filing on social media with a blunt See you in court, creep.
Corporate Safeguards and Federal Precedents
In its court filings, the artificial intelligence firm emphasized that it strictly prohibits its users from generating nude or sexualized images of people without their consent, noting that the corporation previously initiated independent lawsuits against individuals who evade its extensive technological blockers to manufacture explicit deepfakes.
The company previously pursued a similar legal strategy to challenge a California law intended to thwart AI-generated deepfake content, securing a partial victory when a federal judge struck down provisions restricting deepfakes during elections. The new Minnesota litigation also arrives alongside broader federal actions, including the passage of the Take It Down Act in 2025, which criminalized the non-consensual publication of intimate images while stopping short of penalizing their initial creation.
The White House previously announced intentions to contest state-level artificial intelligence regulations, arguing that a fragmented patchwork of conflicting state laws would undermine domestic technological innovation. The federal lawsuit asks the court to declare Minnesota’s statute unconstitutional and issue an injunction blocking enforcement before the law takes effect.
Related reading
