The Department of Justice dropped charges against former Olympian David Hearn on July 31, 2026, admitting that damage to the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool was caused by a botched installation by a contractor rather than vandalism, contradicting previous claims by the Trump administration.
The federal government’s case against David “Davey” Hearn collapsed after new evidence revealed that the pool’s American Flag Blue
lining was failing due to poor workmanship. U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Jeanine Pirro filed a motion to dismiss the charges, acknowledging that the evidentiary basis for the indictment had been undermined by documents provided by the Interior Department.
Atlantic Industrial Coatings and the Failed Liner
The damage, which the government initially attributed to vandals, was actually the result of flawed work by the contractor, Atlantic Industrial Coatings. According to a DOJ filing, the issues included overspraying and a failure of the coatings to bond
, which caused the blue lining to peel and float on the water’s surface.
The timeline of the failure suggests the government was aware of the technical issues long before the charges were dropped. A National Park Services engineer was alerted to the peeling liner in mid-June. A subsequent inspection in July, conducted after the pool was drained for repairs, revealed that the damage was widespread throughout the pool and not limited to the perimeter.
“Given all of this newly discovered information, it is difficult to attribute the widespread damage to the Reflecting Pool to vandalism, let alone to establish that fact beyond a reasonable doubt.”
DOJ Motion to Dismiss, via Politico
Inter-Agency Conflict and the Interior Department
The Justice Department’s filing reveals a significant breakdown in communication between agencies. Pirro’s office alleged that the Interior Department failed to share critical information regarding the status of the renovation work before the government sought a grand jury indictment.
The DOJ claimed it only obtained the necessary documents after reaching out to the Interior Department dozens and dozens of times
. This lack of transparency led to the prosecution of individuals for a failure that was structural, not criminal.
“Had DOI been forthcoming with the information clearly in its possession, the government would not have sought a grand jury indictment.”
DOJ Filing, via Politico
David Hearn and the Prosecution of ‘Patriotic Americans’
David Hearn, a former Olympian, had been charged with destruction of property and accused of causing more than $1,000 in damage. Hearn maintained his innocence, telling NBC News that the pool’s condition was identical after he touched the water as it was when he first arrived.
The legal fallout has shifted from the defendant’s actions to the administration’s conduct. While Donald Trump had previously posted on Truth Social in June that Deranged Vandals
were responsible and should be prosecuted to the MAX
, Hearn’s legal team now characterizes the prosecution as an abuse of power.
“Its dismissal today does not erase the abuse of government power in arresting and charging a patriotic American who did nothing wrong. The government’s approach was ready, fire, aim.”
Steven Levin, Attorney for David Hearn, via NBC News
Administrative Failures and Remaining Cases
The renovation of the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool was intended as a centerpiece for Fourth of July celebrations in D.C. However, the project was plagued by delays and ran millions of dollars over budget. Beyond the liner failure, the pool also faced recurring issues with algae on the surface.
The fallout extends beyond Hearn. While the government has moved to dismiss his case, the U.S. Attorney’s Office has also moved to dismiss at least one of three other misdemeanor cases brought in connection with the pool damage. Tim Lauer, director of external affairs at the Attorney’s Office, declined further elaboration, stating that the motion speaks for itself
.
The resolution of the Hearn case leaves the administration to address the financial losses of the over-budget renovation and the potential for further dismissals in the remaining misdemeanor cases.
Related reading
