At a California trial, two Meta employees testified that the company knew its teen safety tools on Instagram were largely ineffective, with one revealing 0.2% of users adopted a pause reminder feature, while executives downplayed concerns and avoided implementing stronger safeguards.
Testimonies Reveal Internal Awareness of Flawed Safety Tools
Procès Meta: des outils de sécurité qui "ne fonctionnent
George Volichenko, a former data analyst for Instagram’s “wellness team,” testified that his group measured the usage of a pause reminder feature designed to curb screen time, but found only 0.2% of adolescents engaged with it. George Volichenko said a drop in the ocean, adding that his supervisor advised him not to worry too much about the low adoption numbers, as the team existed to protect us from future lawsuits. Volichenko, who left Meta in 2023 after disagreeing with the company’s approach, called resigning undoubtedly the hardest thing I’ve ever done, despite a salary exceeding $300,000 annually.
Francesco Fogu, Instagram’s current head of design, confirmed in testimony that a September 2023 internal report admitted the time-limiting tools had not been effective and were used more as a “showcase” than a practical solution. The report noted that user-activated settings don’t work or are not adopted, while default activation—which Meta rejected—would have reached all teens. Nous avons choisi l’inverse, en sachant que l’adoption serait plus faible, Fogu admitted.
Judge Questions Executive Accountability During Testimony
U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers grew visibly frustrated during Fogu’s testimony when repeatedly asking for the adoption rate of the pause reminder. “50%? 55%? 10%?she pressed, to which Fogu replied,
Je ne sais pas,” leaving the courtroom in silence. The judge’s confusion underscored broader questions about Meta’s transparency, as internal documents revealed executives had removed data showing teens were 50% more exposed to harmful content than adults in July 2023. A colleague criticized the decision, saying, They don’t want a written record proving that executives, who could testify, saw this information, to which Fogu responded, Soit, soyons créatifs.
Procès Meta: des outils de sécurité qui « ne
Meta has defended itself by highlighting its 2024 launch of “comptes ados” with strict default settings, but the 29 states leading the lawsuit—California, Colorado, Kentucky, and New Jersey—continue to demand penalties up to $200 billion and a complete overhaul of Facebook and Instagram. The jury’s non-binding verdict is expected by late September or early October, after which the judge will issue a final ruling.
What This Means for Meta and Teen Safety Debates
The trial has reignited scrutiny over tech companies’ responsibility for youth mental health, with the testimony suggesting Meta prioritized legal protection over user safety. The 0.2% adoption rate for the pause reminder highlights a broader gap between corporate pledges and actual impact, while the internal reports reveal a pattern of acknowledging problems but avoiding meaningful solutions.
The case also raises questions about the effectiveness of self-regulation in the tech industry. With the trial’s outcome looming, the debate over corporate transparency and adolescent well-being remains at a critical juncture.
