Russia: Meta classified in the list of “terrorist and extremist” organizations

by time news

Russia has officially designated the American giant Meta, parent company of Facebook and Instagram, as a “terrorist and extremist” organization, opening the possibility of reinforced legal proceedings against its users in the country.

Meta has been classified among the “terrorist and extremist” organizations of the Russian financial monitoring service, AFP noted on Tuesday on the website of this government body.

In March, a Russian court had already banned Meta for “extremism”, a few days after Instagram and Facebook were blocked in Russia, since inaccessible in the country without a virtual private network (VPN), like Twitter and many media sites. criticism of power.

Since the Russian offensive in Ukraine, the Russian authorities have been carrying out an exacerbated repression of critics of the conflict, with thousands of fines and dozens of criminal cases punishable by heavy prison sentences.

Lawsuits filed against Telegram?

The official recognition of Meta as a “terrorist and extremist” organization makes it easier to prosecute its users in Russia.

On the Telegram messaging system, still authorized in the country, the renowned lawyer Pavel Tchikov indicated on Tuesday that prosecution could be initiated in several cases: if a person publicly mentions Meta without indicating its status as a prohibited organization, or if it shows the logo of the company and its subsidiaries.

In addition, according to Mr. Tchikov, Russian companies that use Meta’s social networks to distribute advertisements, or work with these applications, could also be accused of participating in an “extremist” organization.

Prior to its ban, millions of Russians used Meta’s apps, especially Instagram, a network that remains popular with young people in the country despite being blocked.

Meta also owns WhatsApp messaging, which is also very popular in Russia. In March, the Russian justice had however not ordered the blocking of this application, having considered that it was not used as a means of “public dissemination of information”.

You may also like

Leave a Comment