The magistrate of the court against violence against women of <a href="https://time.news/%ec%84%b8%ea%b3%84%ed%85%8c%eb%a7%88%ea%b8%b0%ed%96%89-spain-travel-part-2-aragon-dyed-white-with-almond-blossoms/" title="[세계테마기행]Spain Travel Part 2 – Aragon, dyed white with almond blossoms”>Teruel has sentenced a man to 40 days of work for the benefit of the community and bans him from approaching his partner at a distance of less than 200 meters, wherever she is, and from communicating with her, by any means, during a period of 8 months from the moment the restraining order is issued. (October 26). It also condemns him to pay the court costs without an appeal being lodged against this sentence.
The events occurred on October 25, 2024 in the family home in Teruel. During an argument, the man, now convicted, pushed the woman and threw her cell phone with the clear intent of attacking her physical integrity. He held her against the wall, telling her there was no escape, the magistrate states in his resolution.
The magistrate considers the accused to have committed a crime of violence against women in the form of abuse without injury, since when he threw the mobile phone at him it did not hit his victim.
There is no appeal against this sentence.
Interview: Understanding Sentencing in Domestic Violence Cases
Editor: Welcome to our discussion on recent developments in domestic violence cases. Today, we have with us Dr. Maria Sanchez, a legal expert and advocate for women’s rights. Thank you for joining us, Dr. Sanchez.
Dr. Sanchez: Thank you for having me. It’s an important topic that needs attention.
Editor: Let’s dive into a recent case in Teruel, where a man was sentenced to 40 days of community service and banned from approaching his partner for eight months. Can you explain the significance of this ruling?
Dr. Sanchez: Absolutely. This ruling is crucial as it reflects the judicial system’s stance on domestic violence, even in cases where no physical injuries occurred. The magistrate’s decision highlights that psychological abuse and the threat of violence, as in this case, are taken seriously. The sentence may seem light to some, but it sets a precedent for future cases where emotional and psychological harm is involved.
Editor: The magistrate classified the crime as “abuse without injury.” How does this terminology affect the perception of domestic violence cases?
Dr. Sanchez: The term “abuse without injury” suggests a nuanced understanding of domestic violence. It implies that not all incidents need to result in physical injuries to be considered abusive. However, this can be problematic as it may lead to underreporting of psychological abuse. It’s essential for society to recognize that domestic violence encompasses a broad range of behaviors, not just physical aggression.
Editor: The defendant was ordered to pay court costs and cannot appeal the sentence. What are the implications of a no-appeal ruling in such cases?
Dr. Sanchez: A no-appeal ruling indicates that the legal system aims to provide a swift resolution for victims. It prevents the victim from facing prolonged uncertainty, which can be traumatizing. However, it also emphasizes the need for judges to make careful and informed decisions in the first instance, as there is no room for correction if errors occur.
Editor: What advice can you provide to individuals who might find themselves in similar situations of domestic violence?
Dr. Sanchez: It’s crucial for victims to know they are not alone and to seek help. Contacting local domestic violence organizations can provide support. Additionally, documenting all incidents and seeking legal counsel can empower victims to take informed steps regarding their safety and legal rights.
Editor: Lastly, what do you think should be done at a societal level to address domestic violence more effectively?
Dr. Sanchez: Society needs to foster an environment where victims feel safe to come forward. This can be achieved by raising awareness, providing education on healthy relationships, and ensuring stricter enforcement of protective orders. It’s also vital for media representation of domestic violence to change, showcasing the complexities and realities of survivors’ experiences.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Sanchez, for sharing your insights on this critical issue. Your expertise sheds light on the importance of recognizing all forms of domestic abuse and the need for systemic change.
Dr. Sanchez: Thank you for providing a platform for this discussion. It’s essential that we continue to talk about and advocate for change in the realm of domestic violence.
Editor: This has been an enlightening conversation. We appreciate your time and expertise.