A source close to the Biden administration: “Today there is a nuclear dialogue with Israel, unlike Netanyahu

by time news

Ahead of the resumption of talks between the superpowers and Iran in Vienna on Monday, Foreign Minister Yair Lapid will leave early next week for a round of political meetings in Europe.
Lapid will meet in London with British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, and then in Paris with French President Emanuel Macron, where he will express Israeli concern about the resumption of talks with Iran and the possible developments expected during the renewed negotiations.

According to sources in the Foreign Minister’s environment, Lapid refers with great doubt to the possibility that the parties will reach an agreement. According to the sources, “The Americans also do not know which direction this is going, and this state of uncertainty poses a potential danger. It is very possible that the powers will try to create a ‘table’ of lifting sanctions in exchange for an artificial stoppage of enrichment. This is a very undesirable situation for Israel.” .

In this context, the Wall Street Journal reported on Tuesday that officials in Israel are urging the White House not to sign a partial deal with Iran. According to the report, officials warned that such a deal would be a “gift for the new extremist regime in Tehran”.

Foreign Ministry sources emphasize that the line is to conduct contacts and also to create media pressure, but in moderation, without going publicly against the US administration.

  • Happy Orim Holiday: These are the 2021 Hanukkah candle lighting times

A source close to the Biden administration told Maariv that “on the eve of the resumption of talks, the Americans hope to reach a good agreement, one that will delay the Iranian break-in. If the talks fail, Washington tends to bring back international sanctions. That is the direction.”

Regarding the Israeli conduct, the source says that “government officials appreciate the fact that today there is a dialogue with Israel on the issue, unlike the days of previous Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. However, Prime Minister Naftali Bennett’s speech, in which he explained “A complex and unequivocal impression. The tone was somewhat reminiscent of Netanyahu.”

A former veteran diplomat, who at the time was closely following the negotiations with Iran that led to the agreement, told Maariv: “Israel is still stuck in the perceptions of the 1990s, and therefore is conducting itself in a bad relationship with the United States. In the 1990s we thought it could be prevented From Iran to become a threshold country, combined with economic, diplomatic and military pressures. This has not happened. Therefore it should be understood that Iran is already a threshold country for all intents and purposes. An attack will not change that either. The Iranians are all about developing missiles. ”

Meanwhile, there is some determination and rigidity among European countries, but a return to the 2015 agreement with the participation of Iran and the United States seems to be a “goal that sanctifies the means” and dangers.

At a meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency’s Board of Governors in Vienna, Britain, Germany and France issued a joint statement expressing deep concern that for two years Iran had continued to “systematically nuclear escalate, irreversibly upgrading its nuclear capabilities while exposing the international community to significant risk”.

The three countries acknowledge that the Iranian escalation is irreversibly reducing the value of the original nuclear deal in preventing the proliferation of nuclear weapons, and call on Iran to renew full cooperation and access to IAEA inspectors.

And despite everything, the three European countries say they will return to talks out of good will to resume them from where they left off. They believe that it is in the interest of all parties to do so quickly for the collective security of all parties, including Iran.

.

You may also like

Leave a Comment