The last time we logged access to the streaming device Queen And his attempts to find his way to fame Immortal DiabloAnd He spent $6,600 and didn’t achieve a five-star legendary gem. I am happy(?) to report that after doubling his investment, he finally got a loot.
as such I wrote earlier in the month:
You’d think that after a while you’d end up with some of the best equipment in the game, a 5-star legendary gem, because that’s how the law of averages works, right? bad! As Quin69 has clearly demonstrated here, the law of averages is inherently cruel and unpredictable, which is why bookmakers have taken advantage of it since the dawn of history, and why it’s like games Immortal Diablo Built on predatory economic models designed to exploit people’s most dangerous and vulnerable psychological impulses.
that was then! It’s now, and Quin posted it after spending NZ$25,165 ($15,818) on the game, including NZ$10,000 in single stream—Has a 5-star Legendary Gem:
G/O Media may receive a commission
Remember, simply buying your way to these items Not the only way to get itAnd, as we’ve seen here it is indeed the worst path, but that’s not the point. The point here is that having it as an option is one of the reasons why the economics of predatory games sucks!
as such Kotaku AU Wrote When he talks about his “success”:
Quinn has definitely attracted her fair share of criticism throughout the experience. His reckless spending and outbursts of anger over a failed fall often make him question his emotional stability. Others, even in our comments, were unhappy to see him give Blizzard exactly what he wanted: his money. In the end, he proved his point. The five star hunt for legendary gems is a wild ride, a system designed to empty bank accounts while giving the player very little.
Anyway, thanks for your service, Quin69. You can now permanently stop playing Diablo Immortal.
“A social media addict. Zombie fanatic. Likes to travel. obsessed with music. Bacon expert.