And after twists and turns, controversies and crosses, finally this Thursday the new members of the Provincial Institute for Mining Exploration and Exploitation (IPEEM) decided.
The Chamber of Deputies voted in favor of including one proposed by the Production and Labor and another proposed by the Bloquismo: this is Aldo Andrés Velazco, with 18 positive votes, 1 negative and 16 abstentions. For his part, the motion of legislator Luis Rueda to appoint Andrés Chanampa in second place was approved, with 32 positive votes and 2 abstentions.
The IPEEM was almost inactive due to the arrival and progress over the appointments of two of its members, after what happened with the appointments of Alberto Hensel and Andrés Chanampa.
The thing is that Orrego did not take the administrative step at the time to appoint them after the controversial session. Therefore, the cimbero turned to Civil Justice to ensure that his position is effective, where he got blocked yesterday. Although the Sarmientino resigned a few weeks ago.
Interview Between Time.news Editor and Mining Industry Expert on IPEEM Appointments
Time.news Editor (TNE): Thank you for joining us today to discuss the recent developments surrounding the Provincial Institute for Mining Exploration and Exploitation (IPEEM). After a lengthy and controversial process, new members have finally been appointed. Could you give us an overview of what led to this outcome?
Expert (E): Certainly! The appointments of Aldo Andrés Velazco and Andrés Chanampa to the IPEEM were critical, especially considering the prolonged inactivity of the institute due to previous controversies. The Chamber of Deputies’ recent vote, with Velazco receiving 18 positive votes and Chanampa getting 32, illustrates a necessary step towards revitalizing mining governance in our region.
TNE: It seems like the IPEEM’s operations were stymied due to administrative oversights. Can you elaborate on what implications this inaction might have had on the mining sector?
E: Absolutely. The inactivity of the IPEEM meant that vital decisions regarding mining operations and regulations were stalled. Given that the mining sector is integral to our economy, delays in appointments can lead to heightened uncertainties for investors and companies working in this field. It hampers decision-making processes that are crucial for exploration and exploitation activities.
TNE: The article mentions that the previous appointments stirred controversy. What were some of the major concerns surrounding the appointments of Alberto Hensel and Andrés Chanampa?
E: The controversies stemmed primarily from perceived irregularities during the appointment sessions. In Hensel’s case, questions arose regarding his qualifications and fitness for the role, while Chanampa faced opposition due to political affiliations and concerns about his approach to mining governance. These concerns delayed the formal appointments and ultimately led to Hensel’s resignation.
TNE: With new figures in place, what changes do you anticipate in terms of policy direction for IPEEM and the broader mining landscape?
E: The immediate focus for Velazco and Chanampa will likely be to restore confidence in the IPEEM. We can expect initiatives targeting transparency in decision-making, improved investor relations, and addressing environmental concerns tied to mining activities. Their approach will be crucial in navigating the complex relationship between economic growth through mining and sustainable practices.
TNE: For our readers interested in the mining sector, what advice would you provide regarding the current climate and opportunities?
E: This is a pivotal moment for investment in the mining sector. As new leadership takes shape in IPEEM, stakeholders should stay informed about policy changes and emerging opportunities. Engaging with local communities and adhering to environmental regulations will be essential. Additionally, businesses should consider diversifying their projects to incorporate sustainable practices that align with growing global trends.
TNE: Thank you for sharing your insights on the recent IPEEM appointments. As the mining industry evolves, we look forward to seeing how these changes will impact the future landscape.
E: My pleasure! It’s a dynamic time for the industry, and I hope to see a more proactive and reform-oriented approach to mining governance as we move forward.