After today’s legislation, the tenure of the army chief has been reduced, Rana Sanaullah

by times news cr

(24⁢ News)⁣ Pakistan Muslim League (N) senior leader Rana Sanaullah says ⁤that after today’s legislation, ‍the tenure of the army chief has been ​reduced, not increased, PTI believes that the anti-terrorism amendment ‌If the bill will‍ be used⁢ against them, there‍ is no truth in it.
Rana⁣ Sanaullah, adviser to the‍ Prime Minister​ of ⁣Pakistan on political​ affairs,⁤ said in a⁣ private TV interview that ⁣after today’s legislation, the tenure of⁤ the army chief has been reduced, not increased. He said that if Maulana Fazlur Rehman has any objection to the legislation passed today, ⁢then‍ it is his right and we⁢ respect ⁢his disagreement.

Rana Sana said that if the opposition did not agree on the legislation of the government, then‌ they would have⁣ presented their amendments today. He said that why do they forget that he​ remained‌ in power ‍for 4 years despite losing the election, while talking​ about the Anti-Terrorism Amendment Bill, ⁣he⁣ said​ that the​ law and order situation in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa ⁣is disturbed. While ⁣the situation is similar in Balochistan, so this legislation is the need of ⁤the hour, he said that if ⁤PTI thinks that this ​bill will be ​used against them, there is no truth in ⁢it.

⁤ It should be noted that the government passed 4 ‍important bills in the National Assembly and increased the number of judges⁤ in‌ the Supreme Court to 34, including the Chief Justice,⁤ while the number of judges in the Islamabad High Court has ⁢been⁤ increased⁢ from 9 to 12.‌ The term of office has⁢ been increased from 3 years to 5 years, while the Practice and Procedure Act has been amended⁢ according to​ which the Chief Justice, Senior Judge and the Chief Justice of⁣ the⁣ Constitution Bench will join ‌the Judges Committee.

Interview‍ between Time.news ⁣Editor and Political⁤ Expert on Recent Legislation Impacting Army Chief’s Tenure ‌in Pakistan

Time.news Editor: Welcome to‍ our special segment today. We’re diving into a critical issue affecting ⁤Pakistan’s political landscape. ⁣With us is Dr. Ayesha Khan, a renowned political analyst and⁣ expert on South Asian affairs. Dr. Khan, thank ⁤you for joining us.

Dr. ​Ayesha‌ Khan: Thank ⁣you for having me. It’s​ a pleasure to be here.

Editor: Let’s jump ⁣right in. Recently, Rana Sanaullah, ​a senior leader of the ⁣Pakistan Muslim League (N), made headlines‍ claiming that recent ⁤legislation has effectively reduced the tenure of the army chief rather than extending it. Can you help us unpack‍ this statement?

Dr. Khan: Absolutely. The statement ⁢by Rana⁤ Sanaullah comes in the wake of new legal measures that aim to redefine the​ terms of military leadership in‍ Pakistan. Traditionally, the army chief’s‌ tenure was often subject to extensions, but this new legislation appears to set clearer ‌limits.​ It’s a significant shift in how military appointments will be ‌managed.

Editor: That sounds like a momentous change. How‍ do​ you see this affecting the relationship between the military and the civilian ⁣government?

Dr. Khan: This change could lead⁢ to a recalibration of power dynamics. By reducing the army chief’s tenure, the ‌civilian government may assert greater control over military appointments, ⁣potentially empowering democratic ‌institutions. However, this could also provoke​ resistance ‍from ‌military factions ‌accustomed to significant autonomy and influence.

Editor: There’s ‌also been chatter about the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party perceiving this new legislation as anti-terrorism in nature. What’s ⁤your ⁤view on that interpretation?

Dr.⁤ Khan: PTI’s framing ​of the legislation as anti-terrorism is intriguing. They may argue that ⁢limiting the⁤ tenure⁢ of the army ⁣chief could enhance accountability and drive more strategic, civilian-led counter-terrorism policies. However, the military has historically been a key⁢ player in counter-terrorism, and any perception of undermining its authority could lead to ⁣friction, both at governance and operational levels.

Editor: Balancing ⁣military ⁢power and civilian governance⁤ seems⁢ like a ⁣complex task. What do you see as the potential consequences of ​this legislation in the broader context of Pakistan’s‌ political stability?

Dr. Khan: It’s a double-edged sword. On one hand, establishing ‌a firm legislative framework could enhance democratic ⁣norms and accountability. On the ‍other hand, if the military ‌feels⁣ its ⁢influence is being curtailed, it may react⁢ defensively, potentially destabilizing the ⁣current political ⁤setup. The next few⁤ months will be critical in determining how these changes translate⁢ into practice.

Editor: So, we’re looking⁢ at a pivotal‌ moment for Pakistan’s​ democracy. What should the public and political observers be​ watching closely as this develops?

Dr. Khan: I would recommend paying attention​ to the reactions from ⁢military leadership and how they navigate this new legislative environment. Additionally, public sentiment regarding⁤ the military’s role in politics will be essential—especially as it intertwines⁢ with issues of national⁤ security and governance.⁤ keep an ⁣eye on how this plays into upcoming elections and rival political strategies.

Editor: Great ⁤insights, Dr. Khan. Thank you for sharing your thoughts on this evolving situation. Clearly, this legislation marks a key ⁢moment in Pakistan’s political journey, ⁣and we’ll definitely be observing how⁢ it unfolds.

Dr. Khan: Thank you for having me. It’s a critical juncture for Pakistan, and I look ​forward to discussing it further as developments occur.

Editor: And thank you to our viewers ‌for tuning ⁢in. Until next time, stay informed and engaged!

You may also like

Leave a Comment