Here’s a breakdown of the main points from the provided text:
1. AI progress isn’t Stalled:
* Initial reaction to GPT-5 was skepticism, with some believing AI was reaching its limits. The New Yorker even suggested a plateau in growth.
* However, GPT-5’s initial focus was on cost reduction, not groundbreaking innovation.
* Subsequent releases from OpenAI, Google (Gemini 3), and Anthropic showed significant progress, especially in economically valuable tasks. Google’s Oriol Vinyals stated the performance jump was as large as ever seen.
* While progress may vary by domain (e.g., slower in areas needing expensive training data like AI personal shoppers), the idea of stalled progress is becoming less credible.
2. self-Driving Car Safety Concerns:
* The potential for fatal consequences with self-driving car malfunctions creates understandable hesitation.
* Public opinion is low regarding comfort with driverless cars: 22% in the UK and 13% in the US.
* Incidents, like a Waymo vehicle killing a cat, fuel public outrage and concern.
In essence, the text argues against the narrative that AI development is slowing down and highlights the ongoing public apprehension surrounding self-driving car technology.
