Justice Krishnan Ramasamy should not hear the case against AIADMK General Committee. O. Panneerselvam’s side has submitted a petition to the Chief Justice to transfer the trial to another judge.
Chennai, First Published Aug 3, 2022, 1:44 PM IST
Justice Krishnan Ramasamy should not hear the case against AIADMK General Committee. O. Panneerselvam’s side has submitted a petition to the Chief Justice to transfer the trial to another judge.
High Court Judge Krishnan Ramasamy, who heard the case filed by O. Panneerselvam as party coordinator and general committee member Vairamuthu seeking to ban the AIADMK general meeting held on July 11, dismissed the petitions saying that since the court cannot interfere in internal party matters, the general meeting can be held according to law and if the rules are violated, the court can be approached. Ordered to do.
Following this, on July 11, AIADMK general meeting was held and Edappadi Palaniswami, who was the co-coordinator, was elected as the interim general secretary. In this case, in the appeal filed by O. Panneerselvam in the Supreme Court against the order granting permission to the AIADMK general committee, all the rules of the party were violated in the AIADMK general committee meeting held on July 11, and the order issued by the single judge of the Madras High Court which allowed the general committee to be held was to be stayed as it was not authorized to hold the meeting without the permission of the coordinator. want In the petition, he had sought annulment of the resolutions of the general committee.
The Supreme Court heard this case and the High Court should hear the case related to the ADMK general committee issue. They also directed the single judge to complete the investigation within 2 weeks. In this case, Judge Krishnan Ramasamy has said that he will investigate these cases from tomorrow. In this case, the advocates of General Assembly member Vairamuthu have submitted a petition to the Chief Justice.
Judge Krishnan Ramasamy should not hear the AIADMK General Committee case in that petition. They have requested to be transferred to another judge. And in that petition, Justice Krishnan Ramasamy has already issued an order that the will of the majority of the members of the democracy will prevail and the court cannot interfere with the will of the majority. He said that those who could not gain the trust of the party members were using the courts as a tool in their favour.
And as a coordinator, the senior leaders of the party approach the General Assembly every time instead of convincing the members to appease the members and suit the interest and development of the party. Therefore, it has been mentioned in the petition that he is trying to achieve through the court, but he has expressed comments that are not related to the case. Therefore, he requested to transfer the trial of the case to another judge.
Last Updated Aug 3, 2022, 1:44 PM IST
Download App:
