AIADMK General Committee Case…Edappadi Palaniswami Appeal..OPS Caveat Petition in High Court | AIADMK Case…Edappadi Palanisami Appeal – O.Panneerselvam Caveat Petition in HC

Chennai

oi-Jeyalakshmi C

Published: Thursday, August 18, 2022, 20:33 [IST]

Google One India Tamil News

Chennai: O. Panneerselvam has filed a caveat petition in the Chennai High Court to issue an order only after hearing his side’s argument in the Edappadi Palaniswami appeal case. Edappadi Palaniswami has filed an appeal against the judge’s order opposing the July 11 AIADMK General Assembly and OPS has filed a caveat petition.

Recommended Video – Watch Now

ADMK Crisis | Co-ordinator, Treasurer post is the highest – Advocates from OPS side

The Madras High Court has ordered that the AIADMK’s July 11 general meeting is void and the general meeting should be held again. Further, the High Court has directed that the General Committee and the Working Committee should be convened by the Coordinator and Co-Coordinator, and the High Court has ordered the party to continue as it was before June 23. After the verdict was announced, OPS supporters celebrated in front of his residence by bursting firecrackers and offering sweets.

AIADMK co-coordinator Edappadi Palanichami has filed an appeal in the Madras High Court against the order issued by a single judge in a case against the AIADMK General Committee. In that petition, he has stated that he was appointed as the interim general secretary in the general assembly held on July 11, and he has said that the order of the single judge, which ignores the will of the majority of members and obstructs the party’s activities, should be cancelled.

Edappadi Palaniswami's appeal against the Madras High Court verdict invalidating the July 11 AIADMK General AssemblyEdappadi Palaniswami’s appeal against the Madras High Court verdict invalidating the July 11 AIADMK General Assembly

No Jurisdiction

No Jurisdiction

Panneer Selvam has already been removed from the party but the post he held has also been dissolved and the court cannot interfere with the will of the majority of the AIADMK. The court has no jurisdiction to comment on matters relating to the administration of the party. He said in the petition that this judgment interferes not only in party functioning but also in the will of the majority members.

Single-headedness

Single-headedness

The judgment is aimed at propagating an individual’s desire for a dual leadership as the party moves towards a single leadership. The judge made some comments about internal party activities. He also said that this is not under scrutiny by the court.

Request for cancellation of order

Request for cancellation of order

Edappadi Palanichami pointed out that in the case against the General Assembly held on July 11, the status quo should continue before June 23, Edappadi Palanichamy has given the judgment as a relief for the demands that OPS did not ask in its petition. For this reason, he has requested to cancel this order.

  2,460 General Assembly members

2,460 General Assembly members

The special judge issued this order ignoring important details such as 2,460 members attended the general meeting held on July 11, the party rule that there is no need to give written notice, the power of the general meeting itself, and the fact that the coordinator and co-coordinator cannot work together.

Request for stay of judgment

Request for stay of judgment

The judgment passed against the general body which has already been held is not admissible in law and the suit is void. The judge should have dismissed the case filed by Panneer Selvam against the party as the coordinator of the party. The party members were unhappy with Panneer Selvam’s activities. He did not suddenly decide to have a single leadership. In a petition where both cannot work together, the single judge’s decision that both should work together should be stayed. The petition is expected to come up for hearing on Monday.

OPS caveat petition

OPS caveat petition

In this situation, O. Panneerselvam has filed a caveat petition in the Madras High Court that the order should be issued only after hearing the arguments of his side in the appeal case of Edappadi Palaniswami. Edappadi Palaniswami has filed an appeal against the judge’s order opposing the July 11 AIADMK General Assembly and OPS has filed a caveat petition.

English summary

O. Panneerselvam has filed a caveat petition in the Madras High Court that the order should be issued after hearing the arguments of his side in the Edappadi Palaniswami appeal case. Edappadi Palaniswami has filed an appeal against the judge’s order opposing the July 11 AIADMK General Committee and OPS has filed a caveat petition.

Story first published: Thursday, August 18, 2022, 20:33 [IST]

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Pocket
WhatsApp

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent News

Editor's Pick